{"id":69643,"date":"2008-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-01-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/29\/kennedy-soutient-obama-par-hostilite-aux-clinton-et-la-crise-du-parti-democrate-selargit\/"},"modified":"2008-01-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-01-29T00:00:00","slug":"kennedy-soutient-obama-par-hostilite-aux-clinton-et-la-crise-du-parti-democrate-selargit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/01\/29\/kennedy-soutient-obama-par-hostilite-aux-clinton-et-la-crise-du-parti-democrate-selargit\/","title":{"rendered":"Kennedy soutient Obama par hostilit\u00e9 aux Clinton et la crise du parti d\u00e9mocrate s&rsquo;\u00e9largit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La crise \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur du parti d\u00e9mocrate, pourtant favori pour l&rsquo;\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle, se pr\u00e9cise avec le soutien des Kennedy (Ted Kennedy et le reste du clan au garde \u00e0 vous) \u00e0 la candidature Obama. Le <em>Times<\/em> de Londres d\u00e9taille <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/news\/world\/us_and_americas\/us_elections\/article3267131.ece\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> les conditions de ce soutien, qui montrent bien qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit bien plus d&rsquo;un acte d&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9 aux Clinton (nous parlons du couple, sans aucun doute) que d&rsquo;une confiance donn\u00e9e \u00e0 un homme pour ses qualit\u00e9s propres. Mettons \u00e0 part toutes les viennoiseries larmoyantes d&rsquo;\u00e9motion de nos penseurs professionnels sur le futur premier pr\u00e9sident noir ou la future premi\u00e8re pr\u00e9sidente, pour observer la seule chose qui importe. Il appara\u00eet que se pr\u00e9cise une bataille f\u00e9roce qui peut ouvrir un d\u00e9chirement profond du parti d\u00e9mocrate. Cette fois, le syst\u00e8me n&rsquo;y peut rien car tous ces gens sont conformes au syst\u00e8me, et ce sont les passions qui jouent d\u00e9sormais.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The backing from Ted Kennedy, the veteran Massachusetts senator, is a huge prize for Mr Obama, providing him with momentum before next week&rsquo;s Super Tuesday elections, as well as a magnet for votes in sections of the electorate where Mrs Clinton is strongest  Hispanics, blue-collar workers and Democratic loyalists.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>At a rally at the American University in Washington, Mr Kennedy made a series of thinly veiled references to the clashes with the Clintons over recent weeks. He said that Mr Obama would represent a break with cynical tactics of demonising opponents.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>With Barack Obama we can turn the page on the old politics of misrepresentation and distortion, he said. We can close the book on the old politics of race against race.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Kennedy is understood to have been repulsed by Mr Clinton&rsquo;s alleged use of racial politics in the past fortnight. In one recent phone call, when the former President pleaded with him to stay neutral in the contest, Mr Kennedy ripped into him, according to a source close to the senator.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He is also said to regard a remark by Mrs Clinton that appeared to give President Johnson  disliked by the Kennedys  the greatest credit for civil rights legislation, as a direct repudiation of the work of his family.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn voit \u00e0 quel niveau se situe la querelle. Pour autant, ce n&rsquo;est pas m\u00e9priser la circonstance que faire cette remarque. Il n&rsquo;existe aujourd&rsquo;hui, \u00e0 part l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se exceptionnelle du coup d&rsquo;Etat postmoderne, plus aucun champ pour le choix ou pour la vision politiques. Tous les candidats sont enferm\u00e9s dans les moules conformistes de leurs partis et tout le monde est confront\u00e9 \u00e0 une crise multidimensionnelle, syst\u00e9mique, totalement incontr\u00f4lable en m\u00eame temps qu&rsquo;incompr\u00e9hensible avec le mat\u00e9riel d&rsquo;analyse qu&rsquo;autorise le syst\u00e8me. Il reste donc le d\u00e9cha\u00eenement des passions, des ambitions, des susceptibilit\u00e9s. A un comportement extr\u00eamement agressif des Clinton, avec Bill r\u00e9gnant sur la campagne comme s&rsquo;il \u00e9tait le candidat, r\u00e9pondent les susceptibilit\u00e9s hautaines et furieuses des dynasties du syst\u00e8me comme sont les Kennedy.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em>, nous dit encore l&rsquo;article, commence \u00e0 en avoir assez des Clinton&#8230; Au reste, on peut voir l\u00e0 aussi \u00e0 quel niveau se situe la critique: \u00ab<em>The Democratic leadership is said to have become increasingly concerned about Mr Clinton&rsquo;s behaviour, while many senior figures on Capitol Hill have privately made it plain that they have little affection for his wife. In committee meetings, Mrs Clinton has often put noses out of joint by overriding seniority rules and asking if she can speak first because she has another engagement. Senators are busy people; they all have something else to do, one long-time adviser said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUne telle remarque conduirait-elle \u00e0 faire bon march\u00e9 des chances d&rsquo;Hillary? Pas s\u00fbr, parce que l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> n&rsquo;est pas plus en position de contr\u00f4ler la marche du monde am\u00e9ricaniste que le reste et les autres. D&rsquo;ailleurs, note le <em>Times<\/em> un tantinet venimeux, il est de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 publique que le soutien de Ted Kennedy est plut\u00f4t porte-poisse qu&rsquo;autre chose. (\u00ab<em> Others say that Senator Kennedy has not proved infallible in selecting winners. In 1992 he initially backed Paul Tsongas against Mr Clinton, before gratefully receiving his help in a tough Senate re-election battle two years later against Mitt Romney  now a Republican candidate. In 2000 he supported Al Gore and in 2004 was a key figure in John Kerry&rsquo;s campaign.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe qui est exceptionnel pour cette campagne 2008, c&rsquo;est bien entendu l&rsquo;enjeu de la situation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale apr\u00e8s une pr\u00e9sidence exceptionnelle de m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9 et de brutalit\u00e9. (GW Bush acc\u00e9l\u00e9rateur de l&rsquo;Histoire, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire du d\u00e9clin de la puissance am\u00e9ricaniste, selon Charles Kupchan disant \u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thewashingtonnote.com\/archives\/002751.php\" class=\"gen\">Steve C. Clemons<\/a>: \u00ab<em>President Bush sped up history and made what would have taken a couple of decades happen in just a few years.<\/em>\u00bb) Que l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> ne contr\u00f4le plus la situation et que les candidats les mieux plac\u00e9s se d\u00e9chirent, cela est une trag\u00e9die pour le syst\u00e8me mais il n&rsquo;y a \u00e9videmment rien de plus logique. Pendant ce temps-l\u00e0, la crise gronde, et ceci explique cela dans un encha\u00eenement qui acc\u00e9l\u00e8re le destin,  l&rsquo;oeuvre de l&rsquo;\u00e9tonnant GW Bush, le plus mauvais pr\u00e9sident des USA, qui est parvenu \u00e0 dynamiter l&rsquo;Histoire&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 29 janvier 2008 \u00e0 12H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La crise \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur du parti d\u00e9mocrate, pourtant favori pour l&rsquo;\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle, se pr\u00e9cise avec le soutien des Kennedy (Ted Kennedy et le reste du clan au garde \u00e0 vous) \u00e0 la candidature Obama. Le Times de Londres d\u00e9taille aujourd&rsquo;hui les conditions de ce soutien, qui montrent bien qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit bien plus d&rsquo;un acte d&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[934,2899,1356,3728,6208,3340],"class_list":["post-69643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-clinton","tag-declin","tag-kennedy","tag-kupchan","tag-obama","tag-presidentielles"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}