{"id":69672,"date":"2008-02-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/02\/12\/john-mccain-homme-des-neocons\/"},"modified":"2008-02-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-02-12T00:00:00","slug":"john-mccain-homme-des-neocons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/02\/12\/john-mccain-homme-des-neocons\/","title":{"rendered":"John McCain, homme des neocons<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il est normal que l’int\u00e9r\u00eat commence \u00e0 se porter avec la plus grande attention sur la personnalit\u00e9 des candidats des pr\u00e9sidentielles US, et particuli\u00e8rement, pour l’instant, sur celui qui para\u00eet le plus assur\u00e9 de la d\u00e9signation de l’un des deux partis. L’accent est donc mis, essentiellement dans la presse alternative, hors des canaux de la presse officielle qui est \u00e0 nouveau subjugu\u00e9e par son devoir de conformisme servile, sur les aspects les plus remarquablement inqui\u00e9tants de John McCain. Et son aspect le plus remarquablement inqui\u00e9tant, c’est sans aucun doute son bellicisme. Justin Raimundo fait un portrait saisissant de McCain dans sa chronique d’hier<\/a>, sur Antiwar.com<\/em>, o\u00f9 il le d\u00e9signe comme \u00abthe most militaristic American president since at least Teddy Roosevelt perhaps the most belligerent ever<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDes pr\u00e9cisions int\u00e9ressantes sont apport\u00e9es par Philip Geraldi, ancien officier de la CIA, \u00e9galement sur Antiwar.com<\/em>, dans un commentaire publi\u00e9 aujourd’hui<\/a>. Elles montrent que McCain devrait largement rassembler autour de lui les n\u00e9o-conservateurs, comme base id\u00e9ologique de son action, d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment, les increvables n\u00e9o-conservateurs<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abWith the withdrawal of Romney, Washington pundits unanimously agree that John McCain will defeat Huckabee to become the Republican nominee. McCain is the neocons’ anointed choice for president of the United States, and has been so for many years. He was their candidate when he ran against George Bush in the primaries in 2000 and again when he announced his candidacy for 2008. When McCain’s campaign underachieved last summer and it appeared that Rudy Giuliani would be the Republican candidate, many leading neocons, including Norman Podhoretz and Daniel Pipes, joined the New Yorker’s campaign. Now that Giuliani has withdrawn, they will presumably return home again, rejoining Robert Kagan and James Woolsey, both of whom have been with McCain since early 2007. That McCain is no traditional conservative if measured by his views on cultural and fiscal issues matters not at all, because the Israel-and-empire-fixated neocons consider such issues unimportant. Nor is there any concern for McCain’s hypocrisy on other issues, such as torture, where he publicly opposed the administration before agreeing to a White House-supported bill that permitted waterboarding and other practices.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tGeraldi d\u00e9taille les intentions politiques de McCain, tr\u00e8s agressives vis-\u00e0-vis de l’Iran mais aussi vis-\u00e0-vis d’autres th\u00e9\u00e2tres, dans des domaines qui embarrasseraient beaucoup les Europ\u00e9ens : \u00abThere should be no confusion about McCain’s intentions, which are basically all war all the time. He has also declared that the United States has a right to deal with rogue states as it sees fit, and he has thrown down a challenge to Russia, insisting that Moscow should be expelled from the G-8 group of industrialized nations and that NATO should be expanded to include the Ukraine and Georgia, which the Kremlin would see as a direct threat.<\/em>\u00bb (John McCain devrait s’imposer tr\u00e8s vite comme le cauchemar des Europ\u00e9ens : l’homme qui montre sans discussion possible que la succession de GW Bush pourrait conduire \u00e0 une pr\u00e9sidence pire que celle de GW Bush, notamment et particuli\u00e8rement pour la situation europ\u00e9enne.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tGeraldi confirme que la campagne d’unification du parti r\u00e9publicain devrait \u00eatre, pour McCain, ax\u00e9e sur la mobilisation par la peur, peur des terroristes, peur des diverses menaces, suppos\u00e9es ou r\u00e9elles, etc. Geraldi estime les d\u00e9mocrates particuli\u00e8rement faibles face \u00e0 cette rh\u00e9torique, d’autant qu’il avance l’hypoth\u00e8se que McCain pourrait \u00e9galement envisager de prendre comme co-listier l’ancien d\u00e9mocrate Lieberman, qui pourrait lui amener certaines franges d\u00e9mocrates conservateurs et une partie de l’\u00e9lectorat juif US. (Dans ce cas, la tactique du candidat d\u00e9mocrate qui affrontera McCain pourrait \u00eatre un quitte ou double, prenant le contre-pied du bellicisme du c\u00f4t\u00e9 r\u00e9publicain, pour pr\u00f4ner une rupture avec une politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re de confrontation ayant men\u00e9 \u00e0 des r\u00e9sultats catastrophiques. Mais c’est une hypoth\u00e8se bien plus qu’une certitude. La pression impos\u00e9e par McCain pourrait \u00e9galement produire le r\u00e9sultat inverse et conduire le d\u00e9mocrate \u00e0 se juger forc\u00e9 \u00e0 rench\u00e9rir sur le bellicisme de McCain.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa pr\u00e9sence de McCain dans la comp\u00e9tition va achever de transformer radicalement ce qui \u00e9tait d’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale per\u00e7u comme une \u00e9lection de compl\u00e8te et certaine rupture avec le mandat GW Bush. On avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 not\u00e9 cette particularit\u00e9. Les conditions sont telles qu’on est de plus en plus conduit \u00e0 observer l’\u00e9tonnante victoire<\/a> quasi-posthume (politiquement) de l’\u00e9tonnamment m\u00e9diocre GW Bush. Le fait de retrouver les n\u00e9o-conservateurs sans doute triomphants autour du candidat McCain en dit long sur la paralysie et la scl\u00e9rose d’un syst\u00e8me absolument incapable de se r\u00e9former et emprisonn\u00e9 dans ses obsessions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 12 f\u00e9vrier 2008 \u00e0 10H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il est normal que l’int\u00e9r\u00eat commence \u00e0 se porter avec la plus grande attention sur la personnalit\u00e9 des candidats des pr\u00e9sidentielles US, et particuli\u00e8rement, pour l’instant, sur celui qui para\u00eet le plus assur\u00e9 de la d\u00e9signation de l’un des deux partis. L’accent est donc mis, essentiellement dans la presse alternative, hors des canaux de la… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7377,4883,4063,1104,1383],"class_list":["post-69672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-geraldi","tag-lieberman","tag-mccain","tag-neocons","tag-raimundo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69672\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}