{"id":69734,"date":"2008-03-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/03\/06\/le-kc-45-la-france-subversive-et-northrop-grumman-en-organisation-frontiste\/"},"modified":"2008-03-06T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-03-06T00:00:00","slug":"le-kc-45-la-france-subversive-et-northrop-grumman-en-organisation-frontiste","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/03\/06\/le-kc-45-la-france-subversive-et-northrop-grumman-en-organisation-frontiste\/","title":{"rendered":"Le KC-45, la France subversive et Northrop Grumman en \u201corganisation frontiste\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La col\u00e8re du Congr\u00e8s est largement en tr\u00e8s forte expansion pour ce qui concerne la victoire de Northrop Grumman\/EADS dans le programme de ravitailleur en vol KC-45 de l&rsquo;USAF. Boeing a r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 faire avancer la date du <em>debriefing<\/em> de l&rsquo;USAF sur la raison de sa d\u00e9faite \u00e0 demain, au lieu du 13 mars, ce qui ouvre la porte \u00e0 l&rsquo;intervention du Congr\u00e8s (le Congr\u00e8s doit attendre que le battu ait \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 sur les causes de sa d\u00e9faite pour intervenir).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn point remarquable est que le S\u00e9nat, d&rsquo;habitude plus mod\u00e9r\u00e9 dans ces mati\u00e8res, suit la <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4954\" class=\"gen\">Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants<\/a> dans cette affaire. Le <em>Financial Times<\/em> (FT) du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/d1cc957c-ea3b-11dc-b3c9-0000779fd2ac.html\" class=\"gen\">5 mars<\/a> note cela, se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant \u00e0 des d\u00e9clarations du pr\u00e9sident de la majorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate: \u00ab<em>Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader, said Congress should hold hearings on the unexpected result. <\/em>[&#8230;] <em>Jim Manley, spokesman for Mr Reid, told the FT that Mr Reid has concerns. The Nevada senator was following in the footsteps of Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic speaker, and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the two contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe FT cite une source pr\u00e9cisant le climat au Congr\u00e8s dans cette affaire et les pr\u00e9visions de Richard Aboulafia, qui en <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4954\" class=\"gen\">remet une couche<\/a>: \u00ab<em>One congressional source said the animus on Capitol Hill over the decision among Boeing supporters was as bad as I have ever seen it.  <\/em>[&#8230;] <em>Richard Aboulafia, a defence expert at the Teal group, said Congress could get involved in trying to alter the decision, for example by forcing the Air Force to buy from both rivals. If the Democrats get the presidency and the House and Senate armed services committees, then all bets are off, Mr Aboulafia said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes commentaires des plus durs parmi ceux des parlementaires (c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire les parlementaires d\u00e9mocrates comme r\u00e9publicains les plus proches de Boeing \u00e0 tous les points de vue) sont extr\u00eamement vifs, parfois m\u00eame grandioses. Il est fait usage d&rsquo;une rh\u00e9torique de type Guerre froide o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on devine quel r\u00f4le est assign\u00e9 \u00e0 la France, o\u00f9 EADS devient une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 quasiment fran\u00e7aise ou manipul\u00e9e par les Fran\u00e7ais, o\u00f9 Norhtrop Grumman est identifi\u00e9 comme un gentil qui s&rsquo;est fait gruger et est utilis\u00e9 comme organisation frontiste. (Selon le langage de la Guerre froide, certaines organisations en apparence neutres ou non-communistes servant de relais camoufl\u00e9s de la p\u00e9n\u00e9tration communiste \u00e9taient qualifi\u00e9es de frontistes.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQuelques citations dans ce sens, venues du <em>Daily Report<\/em> de l&rsquo;Air Force Associatuon<D> de <a href=\"http:\/\/dc01-cdh-afa03.tranguard.net\/AFA\/Reports\/2008\/Month03\/Day06\/\" class=\"gen\">ce jour<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab&#8230;[<em> House Appropriations defense subcommittee<\/em>] <em>Ranking member C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.) echoed similar caution. I want to make certain that we continue with manufacturing capability in the United States, he said. I want to make certain that any technical developments within this program that are vital to the future interest of the United States are not going to be transferred to the likes of a country that I do not have all the confidence [in] that I would like to have in, namely France. Other members were less diplomatic. This thing is fatally flawed in my judgment, said Norman Dicks (D-Wash.), in whose state Boeing would have done much of its tanker work had it won. As far as I am concerned, Northrop Grumman is a front, said David Hobson (R-Ohio). They are a fine company, but they are a front for the French and their other partners.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAutant pour la coop\u00e9ration transatlantique et la confirmation qu&rsquo;effectivement les relations franco-am\u00e9ricaines sont entr\u00e9es dans une nouvelle phase.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 6 mars 2008 \u00e0 08H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La col\u00e8re du Congr\u00e8s est largement en tr\u00e8s forte expansion pour ce qui concerne la victoire de Northrop Grumman\/EADS dans le programme de ravitailleur en vol KC-45 de l&rsquo;USAF. Boeing a r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 faire avancer la date du debriefing de l&rsquo;USAF sur la raison de sa d\u00e9faite \u00e0 demain, au lieu du 13 mars, ce&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3192,4502,4215,2687,7460,7454,4581,5065,7459],"class_list":["post-69734","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-boeing","tag-dicks","tag-eads","tag-france","tag-frontiste","tag-grumman","tag-kc-45","tag-northrop","tag-organisation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69734","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69734"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69734\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}