Une autre version, classique et in\u00e9vitable, de la d\u00e9mission<\/a> de l’amiral Fallon, c’est l’hypoth\u00e8se de la guerre<\/a>, l’attaque contre l’Iran. Plusieurs analyses vont dans ce sens, et l’on peut retenir celle de Justin Raimondo (la d\u00e9mission de Fallon \u00abis a detonation that will reverberate throughout the Middle East, prefiguring the mega-explosion to come. One can hardly imagine a clearer indication that the White House has made the decision to go to war with Iran . It’s just a matter of when and how the administration can provoke an incident.<\/em>\u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL’analyse de Raimondo est d’autant plus int\u00e9ressante qu’elle s’accompagne d’une recommandation originale: un appel \u00e0 Obama. En effet, Raimondo, qui a d\u00e9j\u00e0 pris position en faveur d’Obama au nom de l’option anti-guerre, consid\u00e8re que seul Obama occupe une position et affirme des options qui lui permettent de se prononcer avec efficacit\u00e9 contre une attaque en Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abWe know, when push comes to shove, where Hillary stands on this. Obama’s stance is less clear. We know he won’t rule out military action against Iran, as he told the Chicago Tribune, yet his recent pronouncements I won’t be browbeaten into launching a war that was not necessary, he said of the Clinton 3-in-the-morning attack ad indicate opposition to the War Party’s Iran project. If Obama is smart, he’ll launch a preemptive strike against the idea of going to war with the Iranians before the president acts.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe antiwar movement had better get off its big, fat butt. If ever there was a time to step up to the plate, it is now. The firing of Fallon clearly he was pressured to step down raises the stakes considerably: it means the odds are we’ll be at war just as the presidential campaign season reaches a dramatic crescendo on the Democratic side of the ledger, and at the moment Republican candidates for Congress begin to campaign in earnest. The antiwar movement can have an effect on the course of events, and, God willing, head Bush off at the pass, but only if we hit key pressure points on the body politic Congress, and Obama-for-President headquarters.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbDon’t bother with Hillary. She’s hopeless on this issue and all other foreign policy questions. She votes, talks, and acts in concert with the Lobby, and we can count on her for one thing and one thing only: using this crisis to catapult herself and her circle into power.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAs for Obama he is with us, instinctively, but he may shy away from taking a more definitive stand on account of bad advisers, and, perhaps, a fear of going out on a rather creaky and insubstantial political limb. The Lobby, after all, is not inclined to support him, and will go all out against him if he gets in its way. Obama needs to know that if he stands up to the War Party, the people are with him.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAfter calling your congressional representatives and asking them what they intend to do to stop this madness, call Obama’s Senate office. Be polite, be clear, and be brief. Let them know how you feel about the prospect of war with Iran, and tell them it’s time for Obama to speak out loud and clear: (202) 224-2854.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tComme on le lit, le ton est particuli\u00e8rement pressant, comme si le d\u00e9part de Fallon constituait le facteur irr\u00e9sistible du d\u00e9clenchement de la guerre C’est-\u00e0-dire, inversement, comme si la pr\u00e9sence de Fallon avait constitu\u00e9 la garantie qu’il n’y aurait pas de guerre, comme si la guerre n’\u00e9tait pas une option tant qu’il serait au commandement \u00e0 Central Command (ce qu’il avait d’ailleurs affirm\u00e9). On doit tout de m\u00eame remarquer que les sc\u00e9narios de guerre, les annonces certaines d’attaque n’ont pas manqu\u00e9 malgr\u00e9 le commandement de Fallon, entre f\u00e9vrier 2007 et aujourd’hui, ce fut m\u00eame la p\u00e9riode la plus fournie en fait annonce d’attaques imminentes. (Quelques exemples? un premier<\/a>, un second<\/a>, un troisi\u00e8me<\/a>, un quatri\u00e8me<\/a>, un cinqui\u00e8me<\/a>, un sixi\u00e8me<\/a>, et ainsi de suite.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tOn verra donc ce que nous r\u00e9serve cette perspective d’o\u00f9 l’\u00e9motion et l’attirance pour les \u00e9v\u00e9nements sensationnels et catastrophiques machin\u00e9es par le machiav\u00e9lisme omnipr\u00e9sent des bellicistes jouent un r\u00f4le important.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 12 mars 2008 \u00e0 14H37<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Une autre version, classique et in\u00e9vitable, de la d\u00e9mission de l’amiral Fallon, c’est l’hypoth\u00e8se de la guerre, l’attaque contre l’Iran. Plusieurs analyses vont dans ce sens, et l’on peut retenir celle de Justin Raimondo (la d\u00e9mission de Fallon \u00abis a detonation that will reverberate throughout the Middle East, prefiguring the mega-explosion to come. One can… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6296,2645,2773,6208,4337],"class_list":["post-69747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-fallon","tag-guerre","tag-iran","tag-obama","tag-raimondo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69747"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69747\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}