{"id":69766,"date":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/03\/19\/la-polemique-du-programme-kc-45-toutes-les-options-sont-sur-la-table\/"},"modified":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","slug":"la-polemique-du-programme-kc-45-toutes-les-options-sont-sur-la-table","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/03\/19\/la-polemique-du-programme-kc-45-toutes-les-options-sont-sur-la-table\/","title":{"rendered":"La pol\u00e9mique du programme KC-45: \u201ctoutes les options sont sur la table\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La pol\u00e9mique autour du programme de ravitailleurs en vol KC-45 de l&rsquo;USAF remport\u00e9 par l&rsquo;association EADS\/Northrop Grumman a quitt\u00e9 la premi\u00e8re page des journaux et les analyses des agences de presse mais elle n&rsquo;est nullement apais\u00e9e. Elle est entr\u00e9e dans sa deuxi\u00e8me phase, qui est celle de l&rsquo;\u00e9laboration des tactiques et de la pr\u00e9paration de diverses manuvres. La situation du programme <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4955\" class=\"gen\">KC-45<\/a> se caract\u00e9rise par un mot de la s\u00e9natrice Patty Murray, une d\u00e9mocrate de l&rsquo;Etat de Washington, farouche adversaire de la d\u00e9cision prise par l&rsquo;USAF puisque repr\u00e9sentante l&rsquo;Etat natal de Boeing,  mot qui paraphrase le toutes les options sont sur la table de Bush \u00e0 propose de l&rsquo;attitude US vis-\u00e0-vis de l&rsquo;Iran : \u00ab<em>I think all of our options are on the table.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;hebdomadaire <em>Aviation Weeek &#038; Space Technology<\/em> (AW&#038;ST) du 17 mars publie un article sur ce th\u00e8me d&rsquo;une pol\u00e9mique promiser \u00e0 durer (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/publication\/awst\/loggedin\/AvnowStoryDisplay.do?fromChannel=awst&#038;pubKey=awst&#038;issueDate=2008-03-17&#038;story=xml\/awst_xml\/2008\/03\/17\/AW_03_17_2008_p52-37588.xml&#038;headline=Congressional+Outrage+Over+Tanker+Deal+Not+Fading\" class=\"gen\">acc\u00e8s payant<\/a>). C&rsquo;est une indication claire du s\u00e9rieux de la situation, AW&#038;ST ayant non seulement l&rsquo;excellente r\u00e9putation professionnelle qu&rsquo;on sait mais, \u00e9galement, ayant pris position pour la d\u00e9cision de l&rsquo;USAF et ne pouvant \u00eatre de ce fait soup\u00e7onn\u00e9 de chercher \u00e0 alimenter la contestation contre cette d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCi-dessous, les derniers paragraphes de l&rsquo;article, qui r\u00e9sument les positions des adversaires du contrat, qu&rsquo;on retrouve surtout chez les d\u00e9mocrates (mais pas seulement) et certaines des perspectives qu&rsquo;on peut envisager. Il est probable que l&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation du s\u00e9nateur Inouye est une indication de la suite des \u00e9v\u00e9nements. Cela signifierait qu&rsquo;on attendrait fin juin et les r\u00e9sultats de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=4969\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;enqu\u00eate du GAO<\/a> sur l&rsquo;affaire, \u00e0 la suite de la plainte de Boeing, pour voir relanc\u00e9e de fa\u00e7on approfondie et suivie la pol\u00e9mique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Meanwhile, congressional supporters of Boeing are challenging the Air Force decision on several fronts, claiming the service changed the specifications in the middle of the competition; the Air Force did not take the threat to domestic jobs and the U.S. industrial base into consideration; and that the contract award contradicts U.S. policy in the ongoing World Trade Organization dispute, where Boeing and the Bush administration claim Airbus&rsquo;s development of its newest airliners was unfairly subsidized by European governments. It seems the administration is on a collision course with itself, says Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Wash.), noting that the U.S. trade representative is arguing that Airbus&rsquo;s subsidies are illegal while the U.S. Air Force is buying tankers from the same company.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It&rsquo;s unclear whether the rising tide of Boeing support will create enough pressure to block or alter the tanker deal. Lawmakerspro, con and neutralare likely to hear new arguments in their home states during Congress&rsquo;s current two-week spring recess.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I think all of our options are on the table, says Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), who is leading the charge against the deal in the Senate. Murtha hinted his panel might block the funding for the aircraft if the Air Force doesn&rsquo;t satisfy members&rsquo; concerns about jobs, the industrial base and outsourcing such a massive contract. Murray says she doesn&rsquo;t want to take anything off or put anything on without looking at all of the answers to all of our questions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), chairman of the Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee, says the Boeing protest and the ensuing Government Accountability Office review should be allowed to run its course first.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 mars 2008 \u00e0 13H49<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La pol\u00e9mique autour du programme de ravitailleurs en vol KC-45 de l&rsquo;USAF remport\u00e9 par l&rsquo;association EADS\/Northrop Grumman a quitt\u00e9 la premi\u00e8re page des journaux et les analyses des agences de presse mais elle n&rsquo;est nullement apais\u00e9e. Elle est entr\u00e9e dans sa deuxi\u00e8me phase, qui est celle de l&rsquo;\u00e9laboration des tactiques et de la pr\u00e9paration de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3192,4215,4248,7454,4581,5065,4583,2804],"class_list":["post-69766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-boeing","tag-eads","tag-gao","tag-grumman","tag-kc-45","tag-northrop","tag-ravitailleurs","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}