{"id":69880,"date":"2008-05-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/05\/08\/leurope-libre-echangiste-inquiete-devant-les-perspectives-protectionnistes-us\/"},"modified":"2008-05-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-05-08T00:00:00","slug":"leurope-libre-echangiste-inquiete-devant-les-perspectives-protectionnistes-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/05\/08\/leurope-libre-echangiste-inquiete-devant-les-perspectives-protectionnistes-us\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;Europe libre-\u00e9changiste inqui\u00e8te devant les perspectives protectionnistes US"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le courant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles US et du climat actuel aux USA indique la probabilit\u00e9 d&rsquo;un durcissement protectionniste. Les deux candidats d\u00e9mocrates sont au moins d&rsquo;accord sur une chose: la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de renforcer la protection \u00e9conomique des USA. Le Congr\u00e8s, \u00e0 majorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate, est dans un \u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=5104\" class=\"gen\">similaire<\/a>. Les Europ\u00e9ens partisans du maintien des rapports \u00e9conomiques actuels commencent \u00e0 s&rsquo;inqui\u00e9ter de cette \u00e9volution aux USA, d&rsquo;autant qu&rsquo;ils savent que le durcissement US conduirait \u00e0 un renforcement, en Europe, de ceux (notamment les Fran\u00e7ais) qui r\u00e9clament une plus grande protection de l&rsquo;\u00e9conomie europ\u00e9enne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa sortie de Peter Mandelson, le commissaire europ\u00e9en charg\u00e9 du commerce, est significative de l&rsquo;\u00e9volution actuelle du climat transatlantique. Le <em>Financial Times<\/em>, toujours bien renseign\u00e9 sur les activit\u00e9s de Mandelson, donne le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/4c70f7ba-1c63-11dd-8bfc-000077b07658.html\" class=\"gen\">7 mai<\/a> des extraits d&rsquo;une interview de que doit diffuser aujourd&rsquo;hui la BBC, o\u00f9 Mandelson attaque avec virulence la rh\u00e9torique \u00e0 la mode aujourd&rsquo;hui dans la campagne pr\u00e9sidentielle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Peter Mandelson, European trade commissioner, has said the protectionist stances taken by the US presidential candidates risk taking the world trading system back by decades.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>In an interview with the BBC&rsquo;s Hardtalk programme to be broadcast on Thursday, Mr Mandelson said: It is irresponsible to be pretending to people you can erect new protection, new tariff barriers around your economy in this 21st century global age and still succeed in sustaining peoples&rsquo; living standards and jobs. It is a mirage and they know it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Mandelson declined to say which candidates he had in mind, but the context made it clear he was referring to Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama You match the rhetoric. I am not going to do that.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Mr Mandelson said that even the rhetoric of protectionism was damaging. It is very irresponsible in my view to pretend to people that we can disengage from international trade, we can create barriers around our economy and then be surprised when people retaliate by doing the same, he said. It is going to lead us into a vicious spiral of beggar-thy-neighbour policies which will take us decades back in terms of trade growth.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;attaque de Mandelson vise les candidats d\u00e9mocrates mais il est \u00e9vident que la situation US dans ce domaine ne peut se r\u00e9sumer \u00e0 Obama-Clinton. Le parti d\u00e9mocrate devrait insister, dans son programme pour l&rsquo;\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle qui sera \u00e9tabli cet \u00e9t\u00e9, en faveur d&rsquo;un fort infl\u00e9chissement protectionniste, ou n\u00e9o-protectionniste comme l&rsquo;on dit en se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant \u00e0 des arguments nouveaux portant autant sur le patriotisme \u00e9conomique que sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 \u00e9conomique. McCain a, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 r\u00e9publicain, d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 une position libre-\u00e9changiste classique pour la politique r\u00e9publicaine actuelle (m\u00eame si ce libre-\u00e9changisme est contraire aux conceptions fondamentales du parti). Il n&rsquo;est pas assur\u00e9 pour autant qu&rsquo;il tienne cette ligne, d&rsquo;autant que de fortes pressions existent chez les r\u00e9publicains en faveur du n\u00e9o-protectionnisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa phase finale de la campagne devrait voir un rench\u00e9rissement g\u00e9n\u00e9ral dans le sens n\u00e9o-protectionniste, les d\u00e9mocrates accentuant leur position dans ce sens pour refaire l&rsquo;unit\u00e9 du parti sur un th\u00e8me tr\u00e8s mobilisateur aux USA. Les r\u00e9publicains (McCain) seront oblig\u00e9s de suivre, au moins par tactique \u00e9lectorale mais peut-\u00eatre aussi par n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 politique interne. De ce point de vue, Mandelson a raison: la rh\u00e9torique \u00e9lectoraliste est, dans ce cas, cr\u00e9atrice d&rsquo;une orientation politique. Le courant n\u00e9o-protectionniste, qui est la face \u00e9conomique de l&rsquo;argumentation populiste aux USA, sera \u00e9galement renforc\u00e9 par la crise \u00e9conomique aux USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 8 mai 2008 \u00e0 06H27<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le courant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des \u00e9lections pr\u00e9sidentielles US et du climat actuel aux USA indique la probabilit\u00e9 d&rsquo;un durcissement protectionniste. Les deux candidats d\u00e9mocrates sont au moins d&rsquo;accord sur une chose: la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de renforcer la protection \u00e9conomique des USA. Le Congr\u00e8s, \u00e0 majorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate, est dans un \u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit similaire. Les Europ\u00e9ens partisans du maintien&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3009,398,4367,6806,2804],"class_list":["post-69880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-democrates","tag-europe","tag-mandelson","tag-neo-protectionnisme","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69880\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}