{"id":69893,"date":"2008-05-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-13T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/05\/13\/des-nouvelles-du-jsf-par-les-hollandais-un-nouveau-delai-dau-moins-un-an-avec-tout-ce-qui-sensuit\/"},"modified":"2008-05-13T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-05-13T00:00:00","slug":"des-nouvelles-du-jsf-par-les-hollandais-un-nouveau-delai-dau-moins-un-an-avec-tout-ce-qui-sensuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/05\/13\/des-nouvelles-du-jsf-par-les-hollandais-un-nouveau-delai-dau-moins-un-an-avec-tout-ce-qui-sensuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Des nouvelles du JSF par les Hollandais: un nouveau d\u00e9lai d’au moins un an, avec tout ce qui s’ensuit…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Notre ami Johan Broeder, qui nous a d\u00e9j\u00e0 tenus inform\u00e9s de certains avatars du JSF (voir le 11 novembre 2007<\/a>, rubrique Notes de lecture<\/em>), nous communique des nouvelles de Hollande et du JSF. Les nouvelles ne sont pas excellentes, comme \u00e0 l’accoutum\u00e9, elles sont m\u00eame franchement d\u00e9testables.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa principale chose neuve, c’est l’annonce par le gouvernement hollandais d’un nouveau d\u00e9lai d’au moins un an pour le d\u00e9veloppement et la mise en service du JSF. Cela implique en principe une nouvelle augmentation de $20 milliards du co\u00fbt g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du programme et une augmentation du co\u00fbt par exemplaire du JSF de $5 millions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe 10 mai<\/a>, le quotidien Volkskrant<\/em> a publi\u00e9 un article sur la nouvelle, qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 expos\u00e9e par le gouvernement devant le Parlement. Johan Broeder nous a fait parvenir une traduction en anglais de l’article, ce dont nous le remercions chaleureusement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abAMSTERDAM – The development of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is again delayed with at least a year, sharply more expensive. This is evidenced by answering Questions of the Parliament by De Vries, Secretary of State of Defence.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbEnd April the new delay is discussed at a meeting of the JSF international Steering Committee in Amsterdam. The node is presumably made this autumn, writes De Vries.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbOne year delay means according to the U.S. GAO that the development of the JSF will agaain increase five billion dollar. In 2006 became the development stage of the JSF is already a year behind schedule, because the plane would be too heavy.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn his replies De Vries remains vague about a missing projectreserve of 90 million euros in the Dutch JSF budget. According to the audit of Defence that amount is spent on an earlier setback for the Netherlands to soften.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbLast year it became known that the Netherlands has to spend an extra 206 million eurosm because the United States wiil by their own aircraft later. According to the audit for this sling they used another 90 million from the reserve, which now has fallen to zero. The additional costs for the Netherlands because of the U.S. decision would therefore not 206 million, but almost 300 million euros. This money should be found within the Defense budget.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbDe Vries this statements about the projectreserve seem to confirm this, but he packed his response in complex technical language: The project reserve is more likely to arise in the project by a limited reschudeling of the procurement series. This approach has been abandoned in the recent budget. This once again is fully consistent with the new procurement series.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Netherlands is through a public investment of 800 million dollars closely involved in the development of the JSF. Defence wants the JSF from 2015 to replace the F-16.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbFormally is not yet decided to purchase the aircraft and it competes even with the new Eurofighter, the French Rafale and a modernised version of the F-16. The political decision on the replacement has been postponed until 2010.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn the Lower House a growing fear that the choice has already been determined and that the cost will run out of hand. On May 31 the government would sign a preliminary contract for the operational test and evaluation phase of the JSF, for which two Training planes must be purchased. Last month, the permanent Defense Commission in the Parliament had 267 questions about the project. A major reason was a report of the JSF-American Court in March, which already warned of a possible increase of costs of 38 billion dollars and a delay of 12 to 27 months.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAccording to De Vries there is no chance that the delay will be 27 months. The cost for the Netherlands of the development are fixed, and higher costs for the development phase will have no negative consequences for the Dutch programme<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEncore une nouvelle casserole pour le JSF. Il est d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment difficile d’en tenir la comptabilit\u00e9, et il devient de plus en plus complexe d’\u00e9tablir une v\u00e9ritable situation du JSF, de ses perspectives, de son co\u00fbt, de ses d\u00e9lais, etc.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl semble manifeste que cette annonce par le ministre hollandais De Vries, qui vient d’une r\u00e9union officielle fin avril de l’International Steering Committee du programme (qui concerne les pays non-US engag\u00e9s dans le programme) a provoqu\u00e9 des inqui\u00e9tudes suppl\u00e9mentaires \u00e0 La Haye. Le Volkstrant<\/em> est un quotidien de bonne qualit\u00e9, de tendance sociale-d\u00e9mocrate, largement lu dans les milieux politiques, et son article a sans doute eu un grand impact. Le flou qui accompagne les d\u00e9clarations de De Vries, l’annonce que les probl\u00e8mes mis en \u00e9vidence sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s \u00e0 leur minimum, tout cela accro\u00eet la lourdeur du dossier JSF en Hollande.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl faut noter que les nouvelles annonc\u00e9es aux Hollandais concernent tous les pays partenaires. Elles interviennent au moment o\u00f9 s’ouvre un processus de s\u00e9lection d’un nouvel avion de combat, o\u00f9 le JSF est l’un des concurrents, au Danemark et en Norv\u00e8ge.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tComment consid\u00e9rer le JSF d\u00e9sormais? Le programme est en train de devenir une sorte de tonneau des Dana\u00efdes<\/a> de l’industrie et de la programmation des avions de combat, nous tenant en haleine ind\u00e9finiment, avec recul constant d’une appr\u00e9ciation fix\u00e9e, sur ce que seront finalement ses retards, ses augmentations diverses et sans fin, et bient\u00f4t son destin lui-m\u00eame. Bien entendu, puisqu’il s’agit des USA, il est d\u00e9plac\u00e9 de tirer du fonctionnement chaotique de cette usine \u00e0 gaz p\u00e9taradante quelque conclusion que ce soit sur la qualit\u00e9, l’efficacit\u00e9, la rentabilit\u00e9 de fonctionnement du syst\u00e8me. Continuons \u00e0 nous extasier \u00e0 propos de l’American Dream<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 13 mai 2008 \u00e0 14H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Notre ami Johan Broeder, qui nous a d\u00e9j\u00e0 tenus inform\u00e9s de certains avatars du JSF (voir le 11 novembre 2007, rubrique Notes de lecture), nous communique des nouvelles de Hollande et du JSF. Les nouvelles ne sont pas excellentes, comme \u00e0 l’accoutum\u00e9, elles sont m\u00eame franchement d\u00e9testables. La principale chose neuve, c’est l’annonce par le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7577,2631,3203,250,5002],"class_list":["post-69893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-broeder","tag-de","tag-hollande","tag-jsf","tag-vries"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}