{"id":69900,"date":"2008-05-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/05\/16\/gates-chamberlain-versus-gw-churchill\/"},"modified":"2008-05-16T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-05-16T00:00:00","slug":"gates-chamberlain-versus-gw-churchill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/05\/16\/gates-chamberlain-versus-gw-churchill\/","title":{"rendered":"<BI>Gates-Chamberlain <strong><em>versus<\/em><\/strong> GW-Churchill<D>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>C&rsquo;est un contraste \u00e9tonnant illustrant l&rsquo;\u00e9trange autonomie des diff\u00e9rents pouvoirs aux USA (la pr\u00e9sidence \u00e9tant consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un pouvoir comme les autres). Le secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Robert Gates d\u00e9clare qu&rsquo;il faut envisager de parler avec les Iraniens (le 14 mai) quasiment en m\u00eame temps que GW Bush d\u00e9clare \u00e0 Tel-Aviv (le 15 mai) qu&rsquo;une telle d\u00e9marche \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 celle, absolument condamnable, des gens qui cherch\u00e8rent \u00e0 apaiser Hitler \u00e0 la veille de la Deuxi\u00e8me Guerre mondiale.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn extrait de la d\u00e9claration de GW Bush parlant de ces contacts que certains voudraient \u00e9tablir avec l&rsquo;Iran, selon le <em>Guardian<\/em> d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2008\/may\/16\/georgebush.barackobama\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Bush said it was a foolish delusion to think it was possible to negotiate with extremists and terrorists. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided,&rsquo; Bush said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He added: We have an obligation to call this what it is  the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPendant ce temps, donc, Gates parlait devant l&rsquo;Academy of American Diplomacy, tenant un langage bien diff\u00e9rent (selon le Washington <em>Post<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/05\/14\/AR2008051403553_pf.html\" class=\"gen\">15 mai<\/a>):<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The United States should construct a combination of incentives and pressure to engage Iran, and may have missed earlier opportunities to begin a useful dialogue with Tehran, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said yesterday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage . . . and then sit down and talk with them, Gates said. If there is going to be a discussion, then they need something, too. We can&rsquo;t go to a discussion and be completely the demander, with them not feeling that they need anything from us.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In the meantime, Gates told a meeting of the Academy of American Diplomacy, a group of retired diplomats, my personal view would be we ought to look for ways outside of government to open up the channels and get more of a flow of people back and forth. Noting that a fair number of Iranians regularly visit the United States, he said, We ought to increase the flow the other way &#8230; of Americans visiting Iran. I think that may be the one opening that creates some space, Gates said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa co\u00efncidence est assez remarquable, de m\u00eame le fait que le discours de Bush ait \u00e9t\u00e9 compar\u00e9 contradictoirement \u00e0 des interventions d&rsquo;Obama, voire de Jimmy Carter parlant avec le Hamas, tendis que rien n&rsquo;\u00e9tait dit d&rsquo;une comparaison avec le  discours de Gates. Mais s&rsquo;agit-il d&rsquo;une co\u00efncidence? Des sources ind\u00e9pendantes proches du Pentagone (de Gates) affirment que la quasi-simultan\u00e9it\u00e9 des d\u00e9marches n&rsquo;est pas fortuite, que Gates \u00e9tait inform\u00e9 du discours de GW Bush et qu&rsquo;il a voulu signifier aux Isra\u00e9liens que le pr\u00e9sident ne parlait pas pour l&rsquo;administration (!), que le Pentagone avait une autre position. Cette indication montre que plus personne ne cherche \u00e0 cacher, au sein de l&rsquo;administration, les contradictions politiques, et que la Maison-Blanche ne parle plus au nom d&rsquo;une politique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale mais en fonction d&rsquo;un engagement partisan.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<BRT><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 16 mai 2008 \u00e0 17H26<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C&rsquo;est un contraste \u00e9tonnant illustrant l&rsquo;\u00e9trange autonomie des diff\u00e9rents pouvoirs aux USA (la pr\u00e9sidence \u00e9tant consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme un pouvoir comme les autres). Le secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Robert Gates d\u00e9clare qu&rsquo;il faut envisager de parler avec les Iraniens (le 14 mai) quasiment en m\u00eame temps que GW Bush d\u00e9clare \u00e0 Tel-Aviv (le 15 mai) qu&rsquo;une&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7582,7581,707,3984,3198,2773],"class_list":["post-69900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-apaisement","tag-chamberlmain","tag-churchill","tag-gates","tag-gw","tag-iran"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69900\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}