25 mai<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe invasion of Iraq by Britain and the US has trebled the price of oil, according to a leading expert, costing the world a staggering $6 trillion in higher energy prices alone.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe oil economist Dr Mamdouh Salameh, who advises both the World Bank and the UN Industrial Development Organisation (Unido), told The Independent on Sunday that the price of oil would now be no more than $40 a barrel, less than a third of the record $135 a barrel reached last week, if it had not been for the Iraq war.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00bbDr Salameh told the all-party parliamentary group on peak oil last month that Iraq had offered the United States a deal, three years before the war, that would have opened up 10 new giant oil fields on generous’ terms in return for the lifting of sanctions. This would certainly have prevented the steep rise of the oil price, he said. But the US had a different idea. It planned to occupy Iraq and annex its oil.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbChris Skrebowski, the editor of Petroleum Review, said: There are many ifs in the world oil market. This is a very big one, but there are others. If there had been a civil war in Iraq, even less oil would have been produced.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tEffectivement, laissons les si de c\u00f4t\u00e9. L’int\u00e9r\u00eat ici est la publicit\u00e9 faite \u00e0 une id\u00e9e qui a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 exprim\u00e9e \u00e0 telle ou telle occasion, mais qui est r\u00e9affirm\u00e9e avec des pr\u00e9cisions alors que la crise du prix du p\u00e9trole explose. Cette d\u00e9marche alimente la perception g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la proximit\u00e9 grandissante des crises syst\u00e9miques sp\u00e9cifiques, jusqu’\u00e0 la perception de leur int\u00e9gration, donc \u00e0 la perception de l’existence d’une crise syst\u00e9mique centrale.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tFace \u00e0 notre principal adversaire, qui est le conformisme d\u00e9bilitant de l’esprit qui alimente le virtualisme de la vision officielle, le principal probl\u00e8me aujourd’hui est moins la compr\u00e9hension du m\u00e9canisme des crises que l’acceptation et la prise en compte du fait de leur existence et, surtout, de l’existence d’une crise centrale. Cette r\u00e9alisation est une condition sine qua non<\/em> \u00e0 toute possibilit\u00e9 de r\u00e9action, notamment au niveau institutionnel, \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de cette crise centrale, et, essentiellement, au-del\u00e0, \u00e0 toute possibilit\u00e9 d’exploration des causes fondamentales de cette crise centrale. On comprend dans ce cas que tout ce qui concourt \u00e0 ce renforcement comme cette d\u00e9claration sur le lien entre la crise du p\u00e9trole et l’Irak, est bienvenu.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn notera \u00e9galement, dans ce texte, ce qui nous para\u00eet une r\u00e9v\u00e9lation concernant une offre que Saddam Hussein avait faite aux USA trois ans avant l’attaque du printemps 2003 (\u00ab Iraq had offered the United States a deal, three years before the war, that would have opened up 10 new giant oil fields on generous’ terms in return for the lifting of sanctions<\/em>\u00bb). Bien entendu, les USA, fid\u00e8les \u00e0 leur refus de tout compromis au nom de leur puissance, refus\u00e8rent. Il semble que ce refus soit venu de l’administration Clinton, ce qui confirmerait largement la continuit\u00e9 de la pens\u00e9e am\u00e9ricaniste, tout enti\u00e8re nourrie par la vanit\u00e9 pathologique (hubris<\/em>) et l’aveuglement. Dans tous les cas, l’\u00e9pisode renforce l’interpr\u00e9tation du r\u00f4le central et matriciel des USA dans la manufacture de toutes les crises actuelles.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne 26 mai 2008 \u00e0 11H44<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Il est int\u00e9ressant de constater, dans la perception g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, la progression du ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne, fondamental pour r\u00e9aliser l’ampleur g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la crise syst\u00e9mique, de connexion des crises syst\u00e9miques sp\u00e9cifiques. On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne dans le cas de l’Irak et de l’\u00e9conomie US, \u00e9tant admis que la guerre en Irak repr\u00e9sente en elle-m\u00eame la manifestation… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3228,857,3600,7597],"class_list":["post-69923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-crise","tag-irak","tag-petrole","tag-salameh"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69923"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69923\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}