{"id":69942,"date":"2008-06-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/06\/04\/hillary-pourquoi-pas\/"},"modified":"2008-06-04T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-06-04T00:00:00","slug":"hillary-pourquoi-pas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/06\/04\/hillary-pourquoi-pas\/","title":{"rendered":"Hillary, \u2013 pourquoi pas?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le loup, la louve en l’occurrence, est sortie du bois. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois d’une fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s semi-officielle, sans trop se pr\u00e9cipiter, par le biais d’indiscr\u00e9tions calcul\u00e9es venues d’une rencontre entre elle-m\u00eame et plusieurs de ses coll\u00e8gues du S\u00e9nat, Hillary Clinton se dit ouverte \u00e0 la possibilit\u00e9 d’\u00eatre candidate \u00e0 la vice-pr\u00e9sidente avec Barack Obama. La chose vient alors que le m\u00eame Obama devient effectivement<\/a> le candidat d\u00e9mocrate \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence. C’est l’id\u00e9e<\/a> de ce que certains nomment le dream ticket<\/em>, que d’autres, peut-\u00eatre plus r\u00e9alistes, appr\u00e9cient comme un futur cauchemar \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa nouvelle, annonc\u00e9e d’abord par Ben Smith sur Politico.com<\/em> le 3 juin<\/a> est reprise par AP (via RAW Story<\/em>) le m\u00eame jour<\/a>. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abHillary Rodham Clinton has told congressional colleagues she would be open to becoming Barack Obama’s vice presidential nominee, saying she would consider it if it would help Democrats win the White House, the Associated Press reports.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbClinton, a New York senator, made the comment on a conference call with other New York lawmakers Tuesday, according a participant on the call.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbPolitico’s Ben Smith reports at his blog that at least four members of congress on the call Nydia Velazquez, Jose Serrano, Gregory Meeks, and Carolyn McCarthy raised the prospect of Clinton running for Vice President.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe senator’s remarks came in response to a question from Democratic Rep. Nydia Velazquez who said she believed the best way for Obama to win over key voting blocs, including Hispanics, would be for him to choose Clinton as his running mate.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI am open to it, Clinton replied, if it would help the party’s prospects in November.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRenfor\u00e7ant fortement ces informations, une d\u00e9claration de la s\u00e9natrice Dianne Feinstein, un des principaux soutiens d’Hillary dans sa course \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence, le 3 juin<\/a> \u00e9galement, sur CNN: \u00abI think after the campaigns are wrapped up today, it is in fact a moment of truth. I think a decision has to be made about whether keeping this nomination wide open is in the best interest of winning in November. I do not believe that it is, and I’m a very strong supporter of Hillary being placed on ticket as a vice presidential candidate.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes grandes manuvres sont ouvertes, comme Hillary l’est sur les perspectives d’\u00eatre associ\u00e9e \u00e0 Barack Obama. Il s’agit d’un \u00e9l\u00e9ment capital dans la vie politique US. Une association Obama-Clinton a une toute autre signification, et pour l’\u00e9lection de novembre, et pour la future administration en cas de victoire d\u00e9mocrate, qu’une candidature Obama avec une autre candidature \u00e0 la vice-pr\u00e9sidence.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPour l’instant, la plupart des sondages donnent McCain l\u00e9g\u00e8rement en t\u00eate contre Obama candidat d\u00e9mocrate. Par contre, les rares instituts qui reprennent l’hypoth\u00e8se d’Hillary candidate \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence la place l\u00e9g\u00e8rement devant McCain (Gallup, le 3 juin: McCain 46%, Obama 45%; Clinton 46%, McCain 45%). Mais il y a bien s\u00fbr la question des votes non d\u00e9clar\u00e9s (les personnes sond\u00e9es n’osant pas se d\u00e9clarer contre Obama par crainte d’appara\u00eetre comme racistes, et qui voteraient finalement contre lui) autant que la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des \u00e9lecteurs de Clinton annon\u00e7ant qu’ils ne voteraient en aucun cas pour Obama. M\u00eame si Obama doit monter dans les sondages apr\u00e8s la quasi-officialisation de sa candidature, la situation statistique des deux d\u00e9mocrates est extr\u00eamement fluide et ind\u00e9cise. La question d’Hillary comme candidate vice-pr\u00e9sidente est purement politique et bas\u00e9e sur une appr\u00e9ciation intuitive de la situation. De ce point de vue, effectivement, c’est plus que jamais une question ouverte et pos\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 4 juin 2008 \u00e0 09H13<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le loup, la louve en l’occurrence, est sortie du bois. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois d’une fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s semi-officielle, sans trop se pr\u00e9cipiter, par le biais d’indiscr\u00e9tions calcul\u00e9es venues d’une rencontre entre elle-m\u00eame et plusieurs de ses coll\u00e8gues du S\u00e9nat, Hillary Clinton se dit ouverte \u00e0 la possibilit\u00e9 d’\u00eatre candidate \u00e0 la vice-pr\u00e9sidente avec Barack Obama.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7614,3278,6208,7613],"class_list":["post-69942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-feinstein","tag-hillary","tag-obama","tag-vice-presidente"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69942\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}