{"id":70034,"date":"2008-07-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/07\/10\/la-lecon-danatomie-du-reverend-jesse-jackson\/"},"modified":"2008-07-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-07-10T00:00:00","slug":"la-lecon-danatomie-du-reverend-jesse-jackson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/07\/10\/la-lecon-danatomie-du-reverend-jesse-jackson\/","title":{"rendered":"La le\u00e7on d’anatomie du r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Jesse Jackson"},"content":{"rendered":"

On sait que le r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Jesse Jackson, fameux leader africain am\u00e9ricain aux USA, a le langage vert. On le lui a souvent reproch\u00e9 mais dans ces mornes univers politiciens et postmodernistes qui nous sont offerts il est souvent rafra\u00eechissant. Un peu trop cette fois? Alors qu’il se croyait off mike<\/em>, lors d’une \u00e9mission \u00e0 Fox.News<\/em>, Jackson a eu une exclamation s\u00e9v\u00e8re \u00e0 l’intention d’Obama: \u00abI want to cut his nuts out.<\/em>\u00bb (Comment trouver une expression correspondante? Puisque Fox.News<\/em> a d\u00e9crit l’expression comme: \u00abJackson threatened to cut off a certain part of Obama’s anatomy<\/em>\u00bb, on pourrait avancer que cette expression pourrait aller: je vais lui couper les couilles [s’il continue].)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBref, la chose fait scandale. Outre l’aspect anatomique tonitruant, il y a l’aspect politique, important sans aucun doute. Cette importance est marqu\u00e9e par la rapidit\u00e9 avec laquelle Jackson, mis au courant de l’interf\u00e9rence de la communication globalis\u00e9e sur ses pens\u00e9es intimes, a adress\u00e9 toutes ses excuses et toute sa tendresse \u00e0 l’\u00e9quipe Obama. Le candidat Obama, apr\u00e8s avoir v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 discr\u00e8tement le bon \u00e9tat de son anatomie, a accept\u00e9 les unes et l’autre avec reconnaissance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tParmi beaucoup d’autres, le Guardian<\/em> nous conte, aujourd’hui<\/a>, les m\u00e9saventures du r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Jackson, en nous avertissant de leur importance derri\u00e8re l’aspect un peu leste. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIn an aside to another guest after a Fox News Channel interview on Sunday, Jackson had said Obama had been talking down to black people and added: I want to cut his nuts out. Initially, news organisations had hesitated to broadcast the off-air derogatory remarks. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer said: It’s so crude we can’t repeat it on the air.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abLater, Fox television, which had the tape and withheld its broadcast until last night, reported that Jackson threatened to cut off a certain part of Obama’s anatomy. The network played a clip in which Jackson said: Barack, he’s talking down to black people.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut by then, Jackson had already issued a statement lavishly praising Obama’s run for the White House. For any harm or hurt that this hot mic private conversation may have caused, I apologise, Jackson said. My support for Senator Obama’s campaign is wide, deep and unequivocal.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Obama campaign said it accepted the apology. But Jesse Jackson Jr, a co-chairman of the campaign, said that though he loved his father, I thoroughly reject and repudiate his ugly rhetoric. He should keep hope alive and any personal attacks and insults to himself.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbClarence Page, a columnist at the Chicago Tribune, wrote that Jackson, who recalled his remark as, The senator is cutting off his you-know-what with black people,’ expressed deep regrets.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbJackson, who has known Obama’s wife, Michelle, for years, made his remarks in what he thought was an off-air moment during an interview with Fox television. The conversation turned to Obama’s recent speeches on morality in which he said African-American men were not living up to their responsibilities as fathers.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBien, redevenons s\u00e9rieux parce que la chose est s\u00e9rieuse. Jackson, hors-micro, exprime un ressentiment qui gagne dans ce qui constitue la base originale, aux deux sens du mot, du candidat Obama. Nous en avons d\u00e9j\u00e0<\/a> parl\u00e9, mais cette intervention de Jackson, qui a soulev\u00e9 l’\u00e9moi par sa crudit\u00e9 inhabituelle pour le r\u00e9seau de communication am\u00e9ricaniste dont la bien-pensance est connue comme \u00e9tant corset\u00e9e par un langage plusieurs fois ch\u00e2ti\u00e9, suscite tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieusement la pr\u00e9occupation dans le clan Obama. L’excentricit\u00e9 de Jackson n’est pas sans substance; elle traduit avec \u00e9clat un malaise profond chez les Noirs. (Certains vont m\u00eame jusqu’\u00e0 imaginer que la fuite de Jackson \u00e9tait calcul\u00e9e, pour secouer le candidat Obama. Car c’est bien cela que divers leaders noirs envisagent: faire pression sur Obama pour le ramener vers la gauche.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tComment rattraper cela? Obama se trouve devant l’habituelle quadrature du cercle des candidats qui s’affirment originaux au d\u00e9part et songent ensuite \u00e0 se banaliser dans le circuit d\u00e9mocratique pour aller \u00e0 la p\u00eache aux voix. D’autres proposent le qualificatif d\u00e9magogique en lieu et place de d\u00e9mocratique mais c’est du mauvais esprit.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBref, comment para\u00eetre aller vers la droite sans trop perdre sur sa gauche? Comment rassurer les braves WASP sans perdre les braves Africains Am\u00e9ricains? Et ainsi de suite. Nous compatissons.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 10 juillet 2008 \u00e0 17H56<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On sait que le r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Jesse Jackson, fameux leader africain am\u00e9ricain aux USA, a le langage vert. On le lui a souvent reproch\u00e9 mais dans ces mornes univers politiciens et postmodernistes qui nous sont offerts il est souvent rafra\u00eechissant. Un peu trop cette fois? Alors qu’il se croyait off mike, lors d’une \u00e9mission \u00e0 Fox.News,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[7621,2769,7671,1360,3169,6208],"class_list":["post-70034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-africain","tag-americain","tag-couilles","tag-fox-news","tag-jackson","tag-obama"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}