{"id":70195,"date":"2008-09-17T12:37:37","date_gmt":"2008-09-17T12:37:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/09\/17\/la-bonne-gouvernance-de-lue-en-recul-sinon-en-crise\/"},"modified":"2008-09-17T12:37:37","modified_gmt":"2008-09-17T12:37:37","slug":"la-bonne-gouvernance-de-lue-en-recul-sinon-en-crise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2008\/09\/17\/la-bonne-gouvernance-de-lue-en-recul-sinon-en-crise\/","title":{"rendered":"La \u201cbonne gouvernance\u201d de l’UE en recul, sinon en crise"},"content":{"rendered":"

On conna\u00eet le grand cas que fait l’UE de ce qu’elle estime \u00eatre la vertu m\u00eame de l’Europe; qui a nom, cette expression fameuse et quelque peu pr\u00e9tentieuse en m\u00eame temps que domestique, de bonne gouvernance. L’un des aspects essentiels de cette bonne gouvernance, qui en principe proscrit l’emploi de la force sauf lorsque c’est pour le bon motif, et l’on sait que certains s’y retrouvent, c’est le moralisme que repr\u00e9sente la r\u00e9v\u00e9rence absolue, quasiment de l’ordre du r\u00e9flexe conditionn\u00e9, pour l’expression magique des droits de l’homme. Eh bien, les droits de l’homme version-UE sont en crise.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUn rapport du Council of Foreign Affairs in Europe nous en instruit, \u00e0 partir notamment de l’observation des positions des membres de l’ONU sur ces questions. Les propositions appuy\u00e9es sur les droits de l’homme, ainsi que celles qui renvoient \u00e0 l’ing\u00e9rence selon des arguments humanitaires (officiellement, dans tous les cas), sont en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral en retraite \u00e0 l’ONU. Les pressions de la Chine et de la Russie n’y sont pas pour rien, mais nombre de pays se sentent de plus en plus mal \u00e0 l’aise avec ces notions. Il est manifeste qu’on doit lier cette \u00e9volution avec l’attaque directe<\/a> lanc\u00e9e par la Russie contre les conceptions unipolaires<\/a>, d’inspiration US et soutenue par l’UE, dans les relations internationales. Dans ce cas, l’unipolarit\u00e9 est celle des conceptions morales et humanitaires exclusivement occidentales et, en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, comme la chose se trouve, favorable aux int\u00e9r\u00eats et aux conceptions des classes dirigeantes occidentales.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’EUObserver<\/em> du 17 septembre<\/a> nous instruit l\u00e0-dessus.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe EU is losing its ability to push through human rights projects at the UN, with Islamic, African and Latin American states increasingly alienated from Europe while Russia and China play a more assertive role, a new study says.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbEU human rights positions gained over 70 percent support in the UN general assembly in the 1990s but just 48 to 55 percent in 2007 and 2008, while Russia and China have gone from less than 50 percent to over 80 percent in the same time, the report by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) shows.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn what it calls the EU’s slow motion crisis, the ECFR highlights EU defeats on recent Iran, Burma and Belarus votes, where just 80 out of a potential other 165 UN member countries joined the EU position. Russia and China’s doctrine of non-interference in sovereign states has also attracted support in the UN security council, leading to EU setbacks on Sudan, Burma and Zimbabwe in the past year.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIf Europe can no longer win support at the UN for international action on human rights and justice, overriding national sovereignty in extreme cases, it will have been defeated over one of its deepest convictions about international politics as a whole, the study says.\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en place le 17 septembre 2008 \u00e0 12H40<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On conna\u00eet le grand cas que fait l’UE de ce qu’elle estime \u00eatre la vertu m\u00eame de l’Europe; qui a nom, cette expression fameuse et quelque peu pr\u00e9tentieuse en m\u00eame temps que domestique, de bonne gouvernance. L’un des aspects essentiels de cette bonne gouvernance, qui en principe proscrit l’emploi de la force sauf lorsque c’est… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4426,3764,3228,2631,5099,7777,4372,5100,3478,2730,2609],"class_list":["post-70195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bonne","tag-cfr","tag-crise","tag-de","tag-droits","tag-gouvernance","tag-ingerence","tag-lhomme","tag-onu","tag-russie","tag-ue"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}