Laissons l’enthousiasme aux votant, ils l’ont bien m\u00e9rit\u00e9, et aux commentateurs asserment\u00e9s puisque c’est leur m\u00e9tier. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est que le successeur de GW Bush doit avoir une psychologie un peu suspecte et d’un \u00e9quilibre assez incertain pour avoir choisi de vouloir \u00eatre pr\u00e9sident.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tAP a interrog\u00e9 quelques analystes, politologues, etc., et nous ram\u00e8ne, ce 3 novembre<\/a>, quelques avis gratin\u00e9s, en m\u00eame temps que de nous ramener sur terre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abI guess you’d have to have your head examined if you wanted to be president of the United States right now, Professor James Thurber, director of the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies at American University, told the Associated Press.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThurber suggested that even though all presidents promise to hit the ground running, This one will be jumping out of an airplane as soon as the election’s over with. According to a report released by AP on Monday, George W. Bush became president swearing \u00ab\u00a0to confront problems, to not pass them on to future Congresses or future presidents.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHowever, noted AP’s Mark Smith, after two full terms in the White House, the array of things he leaves his successor to solve is staggering, from an economy rocked by the worst crisis since the Great Depression to a pair of wars, one of which US spy chiefs say is spiraling out of control. And then there are those minor crises, added Smith, listing energy costs, immigration, health care, social security, and climate change. The fixes are all costly and American is flat broke.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbPolitical scientist John Sides told AP, No amount of reform, no amount of trimming waste, no amount of limiting earmarks is going to make enough money available to do things like provide health insurance for 47 uninsured Americans. And yet, suggested Sides, The larger the challenge, the more room there is for presidents to rise to the challenge. The next president of the United States has so many problems, agreed Thurber, that he’s going to look good if he can solve just a few of them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbA honeymoon? concluded Smith. Don’t bet on it.<\/em>\u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tAinsi connaissons-nous la recette qu’a tent\u00e9 d’appliquer GW Bush pour devenir le pr\u00e9sident apr\u00e8s lequel il ne peut plus y avoir de pr\u00e9sident. Ces appr\u00e9ciations un brin sarcastiques des divers politologues cit\u00e9s rappellent effectivement que le nouveau pr\u00e9sident va prendre la direction d’un immense pays qui n’a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 confront\u00e9 \u00e0 tant de probl\u00e8mes diff\u00e9rents \u00e0 la fois, avec une caract\u00e9ristique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale d’un d\u00e9s\u00e9quilibre d\u00e9structurant entre les domaines o\u00f9 sa puissance continue \u00e0 exister et ceux o\u00f9 des faiblesses \u00e9normes sont brutalement apparues. Plus que jamais, la fameuse fable des termites et des conduites pourries, d’apr\u00e8s l’\u00e9ditorial de Charles Cooks du 2 septembre dernier, publi\u00e9 le 22 septembre<\/a> sur ce site, plus que jamais cette fable rend compte symboliquement de l’\u00e9tat r\u00e9el et profond de l’Am\u00e9rique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIl est tr\u00e8s difficile d’appr\u00e9cier si l’enthousiasme du vote, et peut-\u00eatre l’enthousiasme qui saluera le r\u00e9sultat de l’\u00e9lection, constituent la meilleure chose pour le nouveau pr\u00e9sident, pour commencer son mandat. Les premi\u00e8res semaines apr\u00e8s l’\u00e9lection seront importantes \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, notamment pour la psychologie de l’\u00e9lu, sans qu’on ait n\u00e9cessairement des \u00e9chos de cette \u00e9volution. La question est de savoir si l’\u00e9trange personnage qui a refus\u00e9 de se laisser examiner, comme devrait faire toute personne tent\u00e9e de devenir pr\u00e9sident des USA aujourd’hui, pour finalement \u00eatre candidat et \u00eatre \u00e9lu, ne sera pas lui-m\u00eame trop et mal influenc\u00e9s par son succ\u00e8s \u00e0 l’\u00e9lection. La chose prend n\u00e9cessairement une allure historique qui lui ferait croire \u00e9ventuellement qu’il est ainsi entr\u00e9 dans l’Histoire. Ce succ\u00e8s lui ouvre plut\u00f4t les portes d’un calvaire; pour l’Histoire, on verra plus tard.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 4 novembre 2008 \u00e0 16H38<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Laissons l’enthousiasme aux votant, ils l’ont bien m\u00e9rit\u00e9, et aux commentateurs asserment\u00e9s puisque c’est leur m\u00e9tier. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 est que le successeur de GW Bush doit avoir une psychologie un peu suspecte et d’un \u00e9quilibre assez incertain pour avoir choisi de vouloir \u00eatre pr\u00e9sident. AP a interrog\u00e9 quelques analystes, politologues, etc., et nous ram\u00e8ne, ce… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[868,6841,3198,2904,3099],"class_list":["post-70321","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bush","tag-calvaire","tag-gw","tag-president","tag-psychologie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70321"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70321\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}