{"id":70466,"date":"2009-01-16T13:20:23","date_gmt":"2009-01-16T13:20:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/01\/16\/les-relations-usa-israel-en-peril\/"},"modified":"2009-01-16T13:20:23","modified_gmt":"2009-01-16T13:20:23","slug":"les-relations-usa-israel-en-peril","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/01\/16\/les-relations-usa-israel-en-peril\/","title":{"rendered":"Les relations USA-Isra\u00ebl en p\u00e9ril?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Soyons d&rsquo;abord attentif \u00e0 la source. Justin Raimondo, r\u00e9dacteur-en-chef d&rsquo;<em>Antiwar.com<\/em>, est un adversaire passionn\u00e9 de l&rsquo;alliance entre Isra\u00ebl et les USA. Il a toujours plac\u00e9 l&rsquo;influence du lobby sioniste de Washington (l&rsquo;AIPAC) \u00e0 un tr\u00e8s haut niveau, l&rsquo;investissant de pouvoirs d&rsquo;influence consid\u00e9rables, allant m\u00eame jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 le pr\u00e9senter comme le manipulateur direct de la politique US au Moyen-Orient. Certaines de ses th\u00e8ses peuvent appara\u00eetre comme excessives, mais ce tableau nous garantit au moins que ce chroniqueur-l\u00e0 n&rsquo;est pas du genre \u00e0 se nourrir d&rsquo;illusions dans l&rsquo;autre sens Par cons\u00e9quent, un article (ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/justin\/?articleid=14075\" class=\"gen\">16 janvier<\/a>) o\u00f9 Raimundo pose la question: \u00ab<em>Israel versus America,  Is the special relationship&rsquo; over?<\/em>\u00bb est \u00e0 consid\u00e9rer avec la plus grande attention.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tRaimondo d\u00e9taille son argument en ne s&rsquo;en tenant pas seulement aux actuels \u00e9v\u00e9nements de Gaza. Certes, il revient en d\u00e9tail sur l&rsquo;\u00e9trange incident o\u00f9 Olmert a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 en public qu&rsquo;il avait manipul\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sident des USA comme une marionnette (\u00e0 propos du vote de la r\u00e9solution de cessez-le-feu de l&rsquo;ONU o\u00f9 les USA se sont abstenus), o\u00f9 cette d\u00e9claration a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9mentie \u00e0 100% avec une r\u00e9elle brutalit\u00e9 par le d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;Etat. Mais il va plus loin, assurant que ces relations entre les USA et Isra\u00ebl ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 prendre un tour compl\u00e8tement nouveau (\u00e0 se d\u00e9t\u00e9riorer) il y a plusieurs mois, notamment avec le refus des USA de livrer des bombes sp\u00e9ciales \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl, et d&rsquo;autoriser l&rsquo;espace a\u00e9rien irakien aux avions isra\u00e9liens pour une attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran. (David E. Sanger, du New York <em>Times<\/em>, a, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/01\/11\/washington\/11iran.html?_r=1&#038;partner=rss&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=print\" class=\"gen\">11 janvier<\/a>, apport\u00e9 des d\u00e9tails sur cette affaire.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The role played by Israel as the catalyst for war in the Middle East was dramatically underscored the other day, when David Sanger of the New York Times reported Israel had requested access to bunker-buster bombs developed by the US, and also clearance for flying over Iraqi airspace to get at Iran. Both requests were denied.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Tensions within the special Relationship have been escalating ever since. The first public eruption occurred over the UN Gaza resolution, when Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told the world how he had yanked the President of the United States off the podium and demanded the US abstain from the Security Council vote. The United States isn&rsquo;t exactly calling Olmert a liar, but, then again, in the course of denying it, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack went out of his way to issue a stinging rebuke. Olmert&rsquo;s comments, he averred, are wholly inaccurate as to describing the situation, just 100-percent, totally, completely not true. He tartly advised the Israeli government to correct the record.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Is the US-Israel special Relationship fraying around the edges? After all, this is hardly the sort of talk one hears between the two: Mr. and Mrs. Perfect Couple are usually careful to conduct their occasional spats behind closed doors. That this repartee is being exchanged on the international stage is extraordinary behavior indeed. It suggests a fundamental shift in US policy, in part dictated by objective circumstances, and propelled, as well, by increased Israeli assertiveness, which has widened the fault-lines that have always existed between Washington and Tel Aviv.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa conclusion de Raimondo est inhabituellement formul\u00e9e, dans la mesure o\u00f9 elle tend \u00e0 r\u00e9ellement proposer une \u00e9volution d\u00e9sormais dramatiquement divergente (\u00ab<em>While on the surface the US appears to be in lockstep with Israel, their divergent paths are increasingly apparent<\/em>\u00bb) entre les deux pays, y compris avec l&rsquo;administration Bush encore en place. \u00ab<em>The Gaza offensive has caught the US off-guard, and brought simmering US-Israeli tensions to a boil. What Gaza signals is a new turn for the Israelis, a clean break, if you will, with their status as an American puppet in the Middle East. They are clearly going off on their own, intent on waging a war of unmitigated aggression against all their neighbors. Their expansionist tendencies have lately taken on pretty grandiose dimensions <\/em>[] <em>Events are rapidly reaching a dramatic climax, and Gaza is just the start. Even as Israel makes the case that it represents the West, and deserves our support, it becomes less Western, and more like a typical Middle Eastern despotism garbed in the somewhat soiled raiment of democracy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa confusion des \u00e9valuations est consid\u00e9rable aujourd&rsquo;hui. Le m\u00eame article (Sanger dans le NYT) qui est ici r\u00e9f\u00e9renc\u00e9 comme le signe du d\u00e9saccord USA-Isra\u00ebl, notamment sur le fait d&rsquo;une possible attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran, est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e l\u00e0 (<em>WSWS.org<\/em> le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2009\/jan2009\/usir-j12.shtml\" class=\"gen\">12 janvier<\/a>) comme le contraire,  un avertissement de l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> washingtonien \u00e0 Obama pour qu&rsquo;il ne s&rsquo;\u00e9carte pas d&rsquo;une ligne conduisant \u00e9ventuellement \u00e0 cette attaque, donc une ligne \u00e0 100% pro-isra\u00e9lienne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPuisqu&rsquo;il est impossible de trancher dans les faits, ceux-ci \u00e9tant l&rsquo;objet d&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tations en sens contraires comme on le voit \u00e0 propos de l&rsquo;article de Sanger, revenons-en effectivement \u00e0 l&rsquo;auteur. Raimondo n&rsquo;a jamais tremp\u00e9 sa plume dans la prudence. Son hostilit\u00e9 \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence Bush et \u00e0 l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em>, et surtout \u00e0 la connexion USA-Isra\u00ebl qu&rsquo;il a toujours consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme \u00e9vidente, a toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 exprim\u00e9e et proclam\u00e9e avec v\u00e9h\u00e9mence, sans souci d&rsquo;une riposte quelconque et de la moindre r\u00e9v\u00e9rence pour le conformisme du syst\u00e8me. Ce chroniqueur est bien inform\u00e9, quoique nous n&rsquo;attribuions certainement pas son argument \u00e0 des informations ultra-secr\u00e8tes,  qui pourraient d&rsquo;ailleurs \u00eatre encore plus sujettes \u00e0 caution que le reste. Si Raimondo \u00e9crit comme il le fait,  \u00e0 moins de l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se ultime d&rsquo;un revirement secret et complet pour quelque raison obscure, hypoth\u00e8se qu&rsquo;on nous permettra de juger comme compl\u00e8tement improbable,  c&rsquo;est qu&rsquo;il ressent une \u00e9volution d\u00e9cisive de la situation selon les m\u00eames lignes d&rsquo;analyse et les m\u00eames sources d&rsquo;information qui lui ont fait exposer le contraire avec v\u00e9h\u00e9mence pendant plusieurs ann\u00e9es. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une indication pr\u00e9cieuse.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl est bien entendu difficile de conclure dans un sens ou dans l&rsquo;autre, et cela n&rsquo;aurait gu\u00e8re de sens ni de raison. Par contre, ce qu&rsquo;il faut observer c&rsquo;est que nous nous trouvons dans une p\u00e9riode d&rsquo;extr\u00eame vitesse des \u00e9v\u00e9nements, \u00e9ventuellement de changements des positions, tant non-publiques que publiques, que la pression de la crise g\u00e9n\u00e9rale conduit \u00e0 des \u00e9volutions impr\u00e9vues et impr\u00e9visibles, que des basculements inattendus peuvent survenir \u00e9galement tr\u00e8s rapidement. La validit\u00e9 des \u00e9v\u00e9nements, entre les discours virtualistes et la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, change \u00e9galement tr\u00e8s rapidement. Raimondo d\u00e9veloppe sa th\u00e8se alors que le Congr\u00e8s soutient Isra\u00ebl d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on tellement excessive et aveugle, qu&rsquo;on en est conduit \u00e0 se demander ce que signifie aujourd&rsquo;hui un vote de cette sorte,  et, finalement, cette analyse ne nous para\u00eet pas d\u00e9mentie par ce vote puisque ce vote ne semble plus rien signifier, et d&rsquo;ailleurs se pla\u00e7ant <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-gaza_divise_l_amerique_et_les_juifs_us_13_01_2009.html\" class=\"gen\">en contradiction<\/a> avec le courant d&rsquo;opinion aux USA.. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 16 janvier 2009 \u00e0 13H19<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Soyons d&rsquo;abord attentif \u00e0 la source. Justin Raimondo, r\u00e9dacteur-en-chef d&rsquo;Antiwar.com, est un adversaire passionn\u00e9 de l&rsquo;alliance entre Isra\u00ebl et les USA. Il a toujours plac\u00e9 l&rsquo;influence du lobby sioniste de Washington (l&rsquo;AIPAC) \u00e0 un tr\u00e8s haut niveau, l&rsquo;investissant de pouvoirs d&rsquo;influence consid\u00e9rables, allant m\u00eame jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 le pr\u00e9senter comme le manipulateur direct de la politique US&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2774,5632,4337,2766,2789,4983,8050],"class_list":["post-70466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-israel","tag-olmert","tag-raimondo","tag-relations","tag-rupture","tag-speciales","tag-usa-israel"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}