D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, la tension monte, monte, et l’on est tr\u00e8s nerveux. Cela, notamment, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de Lockheed Martin (LM) lorsqu’il s’agit de son JSF et puisqu’il s’agit effectivement du programme JSF. Cette nervosit\u00e9 se ferait sentir du c\u00f4t\u00e9 d’un d\u00e9put\u00e9 australien, le Dr. Dennis Jensen, opposant d\u00e9clar\u00e9 de l’achat du JSF par son pays.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tLe site WorldWideWarPigs<\/em> signale, le 4 mars<\/a>, dans la derni\u00e8re \u00e9dition de la lettre d’information Asia-Pacific Aerospace Report<\/em>, une tr\u00e8s \u00e9trange intervention d’un officiel de Lockheed Martin, concernant le d\u00e9put\u00e9 australien Dennis Jensen, adversaire d\u00e9clar\u00e9 du choix du JSF. Le site qualifie cela de \u00abshocking statement, that if true, begs for a federal investigation on both sides of the Pacific.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe texte de Asia-Pacific Aerospace Report<\/em> dit ceci: \u00abLockMart warns Australian MP<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0It appears the US defence industry complex fondly remembers the way some of its wilder members solved political problems during the 1970s in places like Bolivia. During a pre-Australian Air Show briefing to journalists in Canberra last week a Lockheed Martin executive predicted that JSF critic Dr Dennis Jensen, the Western Australian member of the federal parliament and a former defence scientist, may not obtain preselection for his Federal Parliamentary seat for Australia’s next election.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCette sorte d’activit\u00e9, dans les fortunes politiques diverses, en marge du programme JSF, n’est pas in\u00e9dite. On en eut de la sorte, au printemps 2002, en Hollande. Le leader populiste Pym Fortuyn, grand favori d\u00e9s \u00e9lections l\u00e9gislatives de la mi-mai 2002, fut assassin\u00e9 quelques jours avant le scrutin. Fortuyn \u00e9tait contre le JSF et des rumeurs tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cises coururent \u00e0 cette \u00e9poque, \u00e0 ce propos. Le parti de Fortuyn gagna les \u00e9lections puis, surprise, surprise, vota en faveur du choix (en f\u00e9vrier 2002<\/a>) du gouvernement hollandais d’entrer dans le programme JSF, contre les pr\u00e9f\u00e9rences de Fortuyn. Nous rapportions ces p\u00e9rip\u00e9ties le 30 juin 2002<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 5 mars 2009 \u00e0 09H43<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, la tension monte, monte, et l’on est tr\u00e8s nerveux. Cela, notamment, du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de Lockheed Martin (LM) lorsqu’il s’agit de son JSF et puisqu’il s’agit effectivement du programme JSF. Cette nervosit\u00e9 se ferait sentir du c\u00f4t\u00e9 d’un d\u00e9put\u00e9 australien, le Dr. Dennis Jensen, opposant d\u00e9clar\u00e9 de l’achat du JSF par son pays.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4787,3223,3203,5183,250,3501,3502],"class_list":["post-70584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-australie","tag-fortuyn","tag-hollande","tag-jensen","tag-jsf","tag-lockheed","tag-martin"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}