9 mars<\/a>, l’archev\u00eaque engage vivement \u00e0 abandonner la d\u00e9marche courante du bouc \u00e9missaire pour aller au cur des choses; ne pas s’en tenir \u00e0 l’attaque contre le syst\u00e8me bancaire et les banquiers corrompus et consid\u00e9rer la crise dans sa globalit\u00e9. Le syst\u00e8me en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, dit Rowan, la globalisation, la d\u00e9r\u00e9gulation, l’anarchie install\u00e9e du profit et de la cupidit\u00e9, sont \u00e9videmment la cause et la responsabilit\u00e9 g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de la crise. Bref, la crise est la crise et non pas seulement la crise des banques, la crise du syst\u00e8me financier et de ceux qui en ont profit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abBlaming the greed of individual bankers for the financial crisis was too easy and people should instead be asking profound questions about how poorly regulated economies obsessed with ever-growing consumer choice have skewed the judgments of entire countries, the Archbishop of Canterbury has said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe Right Rev Rowan Williams used a lecture in Cardiff at the weekend to deliver a wide-ranging attack on a globalised economic system which had been spectacularly successful in generating purchasing power but which had also led us to the most radical insecurity imaginable.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAs economists struggle to find technical solutions to the recession, which has brought interests rates to their lowest level in 300 years and forced the government to cut VAT in an effort to get shoppers back into the high street, he said ordinary people had to ask themselves difficult questions about their own lives. To use one of the more obvious examples, it has become clear that lifestyles dependent on high levels of fossil fuel consumption reduce the long-term opportunities of basic human flourishing for many people because of their environmental cost – not to mention the various political traps associated with the production and marketing of oil in some parts of the world, with the consequent risks to peace and regional stability.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbDr Williams criticised the unthinking pursuit of growth, which had led to an \u00ab\u00a0unhealthily hyperactive\u00a0\u00bb economy. He said: If it is essential to invest in certain kinds of productive ventures, how does this relate to the broader and longer-term imperative of securing the funding of social care future by way of sustainable shared resources, accumulated wealth?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’archev\u00eaque dit ce que nous savons, ou devrions savoir d’intuition ferme et d’exp\u00e9rience assur\u00e9e. Il est bon qu’il le dise et la r\u00e9p\u00e8te parce qu’il est si courant de c\u00e9der \u00e0 la tentation de s’en tenir \u00e0 quelques-unes des cons\u00e9quences de l’essentiel pour se dissimuler l’essentiel. La cupidit\u00e9 et le nihilisme des banquiers ne sont qu’une cons\u00e9quence extr\u00eame du syst\u00e8me en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. La limite du jugement \u00e0 leur encontre, dont la s\u00e9v\u00e9rit\u00e9 est \u00e9videmment fond\u00e9e, est qu’ils ont agi selon les r\u00e8gles, ou l’absence de r\u00e8gles du syst\u00e8me. Ils ont suivi sa logique jusqu’au terme, ou bien disons qu’ils ont profit\u00e9 de cette logique jusqu’au terme, mais ce n’est nullement la trahir, au contraire c’est s’y conformer. Par cons\u00e9quent, la responsabilit\u00e9 essentielle revient au syst\u00e8me g\u00e9n\u00e9ral.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tPar cons\u00e9quent, l’archev\u00eaque nous rappelle aux responsabilit\u00e9s de nos jugements en m\u00eame temps qu’il rappelle l’ampleur extraordinaire de la crise. Il rappelle opportun\u00e9ment la formidable responsabilit\u00e9 du syst\u00e8me \u00e9conomique dans la d\u00e9gradation de l’environnement et, par cons\u00e9quent, dans la crise climatique. Cela permet effectivement d’installer la crise que nous subissons dans son v\u00e9ritable cadre: crise syst\u00e9mique mais aussi<\/strong> crise eschatologique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tIl faut noter que l’archev\u00eaque reste pratique et britannique. Il met en garde contre la tentation du protectionnisme parmi les rem\u00e8des recherch\u00e9s mais il r\u00e9clame des r\u00e9gulations et des r\u00e9glementations qui reviendraient finalement \u00e0 porter une s\u00e9v\u00e8re attaque contre le libre-\u00e9changisme tel qu’il est pratiqu\u00e9. (\u00abLearning how to use governmental antitrust legislation to break up the virtually monopolistic powers of large multinationals that have become cuckoos in the nest of a national economy would also be an essential part of a strategy designed to stop the slide from opportunistic outsourcing towards protectionism and monitoring or policing the chaotic flow of capital across boundaries.<\/em>\u00bb) Si l’on a l’esprit les connexions d’influence de la haute hi\u00e9rarchie religieuse britannique et des milieux dirigeants, on peut avancer l’observation que cette id\u00e9e pourrait repr\u00e9senter une \u00e9volution possible \u00e0 venir des dirigeants anglo-saxons\/britanniques devant l’ampleur sans cesse accrue de la crise. Il s’agirait de continuer \u00e0 repousser l’id\u00e9e du protectionnisme mais de resserrer de plus en plus le contr\u00f4le des \u00e9changes selon une orientation de plus en plus protectrice; en un sens, faire de plus en plus de protectionnisme s\u00e9lectif sans le dire. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 9 mars 2009 \u00e0 06H45<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’archev\u00eaque de Canterbury, le Right Reverend Rowan Williams, est connu pour ses prises de position radicales en mati\u00e8re de politique. Il a fait sentir une ferme et rude opposition \u00e0 l’engagement blairiste et \u00e9ventuellement britannique en Irak. Aujourd’hui, il sermonne \u00e0 propos de la crise. Ses propos ne sont nullement inint\u00e9ressants et ils peuvent \u00eatre… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4511,4512,3392,3228,7548,7709,1097,3014,6277],"class_list":["post-70591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-archeveque","tag-canterbury","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-eschatologie","tag-financier","tag-protectionnisme","tag-systeme","tag-systemique"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}