25 mars 2009<\/a> (ce matin pour nous) et r\u00e9percute l’avis d’\u00e9conomistes ou experts tch\u00e8ques qui explorent, pour les am\u00e9ricanistes interdits devant cet \u00e9v\u00e9nement \u00e9trange, les myst\u00e8res de Topolanek, revu-Chris R\u00e9a.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tNous apprenons ainsi qu’enfer dans un pays non-croyant n’a pas la m\u00eame signification qu’Enfer en pays croyant, que les flammes y br\u00fblent moins, donc qu’il faut pond\u00e9rer; que Topolanek est un provincial, puisqu’il habite Prague, qui est clairement la province par rapport au Texas ou au Colorado; que, de toutes les fa\u00e7ons, il n’y conna\u00eet rien; qu’il ne sait pas, ou tr\u00e8s mal, ce qu’il y a dans les mesures am\u00e9ricanistes; qu’il est contre l’intervention des gouvernements, ce qui prouve (suite) qu’il n’y conna\u00eet rien, ni \u00e0 l’Am\u00e9rique, ni \u00e0 l’\u00e9volution des temps; qu’il est un fondamentaliste z\u00e9l\u00e9 du libre march\u00e9, ce qui prouve (re-suite) qu’il n’y conna\u00eet rien, ni \u00e0 l’Am\u00e9rique, ni \u00e0 l’\u00e9volution des temps; et ainsi de suite<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00bbCzech analysts caution that the Topolanek quote getting the most attention the way to hell sounds worse in English than it does in Czech. It means a little something different, said Jan Machacek, an economist and analyst for the Czech newspaper Hospodarske noviny. This is an anti-religious country. When people say hell, they say it much more lightly than people do in America. It sounds like he listens to AC\/DC, the heavy-metal band.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbJiri Pehe, the head of New York University in Prague and a leading political analyst, agreed that the remark sounds a bit more sinister in English than it does in Czech. But Pehe made no excuses for the Czech prime minister, who he said spoke out of both ignorance and political conviction.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHe doesn’t really know very much about the U.S. stimulus package, (and) he is a self-professed neo-liberal who believes that government should not intervene in the markets, said Pehe, a long-time critic of Topolanek’s center-right Civic Democratic Party. Free-market fundamentalism may be a valid stance for the head of a small country in the middle of Europe, Pehe said, but it was inappropriate for Topolanek to express when the Czech Republic holds the EU presidency. He is entitled to those beliefs, but when he says that on this kind of stage which means it’s going to travel to the United States it’s stupid. The vocabulary he uses is unfortunate, Pehe said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbTopolanek may have been flustered, said Machacek, because his government lost a confidence vote in parliament the night before by a single vote. That means he and all the ministers in his government must resign, which he said Wednesday he will do. Czech President Vaclav Klaus is expected to ask Topolanek to try to form a new government.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMachacek also said Topolanek’s criticism of the U.S. stimulus plan may be based on purely local experience. His perspective is influenced by the Czech experience. This is a small open economy, where the stimulus would not be effective,\u00a0\u00bb he said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tTout cela dispense une certaine saveur, \u00e0 observer les convulsions et contorsions des th\u00e9ories \u00e9conomiques des uns et des autres, selon les convictions des uns et des autres, et selon la couleur des temps; puisque, en l’occurrence, on est en train de faire la le\u00e7on \u00e0 un Europ\u00e9en, pr\u00e9sident de l’UE et insulteur des USA \u00e0 ce propos, pour avoir montr\u00e9 \u00e0 cette occasion un peu trop de passion pour des th\u00e8ses que les USA nous pressent depuis des d\u00e9cennies d’\u00e9pouser et d’aimer beaucoup.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tEt puis, tout s’\u00e9claire avec le dernier propos, du journaliste Machacek qui, pris d’un remord tardif, entend mettre l’attaque de Topolanek en perspective. Si l’on comprend bien, lorsque Topolanek parlait, c’\u00e9tait Merkel, et peut-\u00eatre bien Sarko engag\u00e9 dans l’affaire, qui parlaient discr\u00e8tement par sa voix. En fait, personne n’en a jamais vraiment dout\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abThat said, Machacek argued, Topolanek’s position is not completely outside the pale in the European Union. The Czech perspective doesn’t differ that much from the German position, he said. But the Germans would never be so undiplomatic.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 26 mars 2009 \u00e0 16H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Oui ou non, finalement, Topolanek, le Premier ministre tch\u00e8que justement d\u00e9missionn\u00e9 par la d\u00e9mocratique assembl\u00e9e tch\u00e8que, oui ou non, a-t-il dit, pour qualifier devant le Parlement europ\u00e9en la politique \u00e9conomique des USA, way to hell ou road to hell, et alors, avec le deuxi\u00e8me cas, est-il ainsi d’accord avec Chris R\u00e9a, et nous sommes-nous tromp\u00e9s… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2],"tags":[5694,398,8205,4679,4633,8206,8204],"class_list":["post-70639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-eu","tag-europe","tag-hell","tag-liberal","tag-merkel","tag-rea","tag-topolanek"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}