{"id":70721,"date":"2009-04-29T14:36:36","date_gmt":"2009-04-29T14:36:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/04\/29\/face-a-son-pire-ennemi-la-realite-moby-dick-ferme-les-ecoutilles\/"},"modified":"2009-04-29T14:36:36","modified_gmt":"2009-04-29T14:36:36","slug":"face-a-son-pire-ennemi-la-realite-moby-dick-ferme-les-ecoutilles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/04\/29\/face-a-son-pire-ennemi-la-realite-moby-dick-ferme-les-ecoutilles\/","title":{"rendered":"Face \u00e0 son pire ennemi (la r\u00e9alit\u00e9), Moby Dick<\/em> ferme les \u00e9coutilles"},"content":{"rendered":"

Que faire lorsque la temp\u00eate gronde? Les vieux loups de mer vous r\u00e9pondront: on ferme les \u00e9coutilles. La temp\u00eate, pour le Pentagone, c’est manifestement les menaces de r\u00e9forme qu’on entend gronder un peu partout, les informations diverses qui circulent sur les avatars dont souffre ce m\u00eame Pentagone, les analyses qui expliquent les erreurs du Pentagone, les pamphlets qui d\u00e9noncent les stupidit\u00e9s du Pentagone Bref, la temp\u00eate qui gronde, en un mot, c’est la menace que la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 fait peser sur le Pentagone, alias<\/em> le bien-surnomm\u00e9 Moby Dick<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tWilliam S. Lind nous avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9, il y a quelques mois, le 26 d\u00e9cembre 2008<\/a>, que le Pentagone bloquait l’acc\u00e8s du Center of Defense Information<\/a> (nid de vip\u00e8res r\u00e9formistes et lubriques bien connues). Le m\u00eame Lind nous donne des pr\u00e9cisions en nous confirmant le blocage du CDI, mais en le situant dans une campagne g\u00e9n\u00e9rale du Pentagone de blocage d’acc\u00e8s aux sites ext\u00e9rieurs, non-contr\u00f4l\u00e9s, ind\u00e9pendants, etc., qui diffuseraient de la litt\u00e9rature subversive pour la bureaucratie inqui\u00e8te de Moby Dick<\/em>. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici quelques pr\u00e9cisions de Lind, ce 28 avril 2009<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abIn recent months, more and more American officers have told me that when they attempt to access the websites they need, they find access is blocked on DOD computers. Is al Qaeda doing this in a dastardly attempt to blind American combat units?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSadly, no. DOD is doing it. Someone in DOD is putting blinders on American troops.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI do not know who is behind this particular bit of idiocy. It may be the security trolls. They always like to restrict access to information, because doing so increases their bureaucratic power. One argument points to them, namely an assertion that the other side may obtain useful information by seeing what we are looking for. That is like arguing that our troops should be given no ammunition lest muzzle flashes give away their positions in a fire-fight.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut the fact that websites of American organizations whose views differ from DOD’s are also blocked points elsewhere. It suggests political involvement. Why, for example, is access to the website of the Center for Defense Information blocked? CDI is located in Washington, not the Hindu Kush. Its work includes the new book on military reform America’s Defense Meltdown, which has garnered quite a bit of attention at Quantico.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe goal of the website blockers, it seems, is to cut American military men off from any views except those of DOD itself. In other words, the blockaders want to create a closed system. John Boyd had quite a bit to say about closed systems, and it wasn’t favorable.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEffectivement, il est int\u00e9ressant de constater que l’Ennemi, aujourd’hui, pour Moby Dick<\/em>, est de plus en plus la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, et la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 environnante, \u00e0 commencer par celle du pays ami par excellence qui est le propre pays du Pentagone, du moins en th\u00e9orie, certains diraient, en un sens, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocratique, dans tous les cas, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de l’information ind\u00e9pendante. Le Pentagone s’enferme dans une bulle g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, qu’il veut opaque, sans le moindre lien avec la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, pour poursuivre son exercice de cr\u00e9ation de sa r\u00e9alit\u00e9 virtuelle qui lui a si bien r\u00e9ussi jusqu’ici. Il faut observer la logique et l’homog\u00e9n\u00e9it\u00e9 de cette \u00e9volution, puisque c’est retrouver, \u00e0 l’\u00e9chelle du Pentagone lui-m\u00eame, le processus<\/a> suivi depuis plusieurs ann\u00e9es par la bureaucratie sp\u00e9cifique (JSF Program Office + Lockheed Martin) qui contr\u00f4le le programme JSF, avec le succ\u00e8s qu’on sait, et dont le principal adversaire<\/a> s’av\u00e8re effectivement \u00eatre l’information ind\u00e9pendante sur Internet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa vraie guerre, \u00e9galement un des aspects de la G4G, dont Lind parle dans son billet, est de plus en plus \u00e9videmment celle de la communication de l’information, et elle se livre entre le syst\u00e8me et sa contestation ext\u00e9rieure, la r\u00e9sistance contre cette \u00e9volution aveugle et tyrannique du syst\u00e8me. Les id\u00e9ologies, les nationalit\u00e9s, toutes les structures habituelles s’effacent dans cette bataille, que nous aurions tendance \u00e0 qualifier d’ultime, entre le syst\u00e8me et la r\u00e9alit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 29 avril 2009 \u00e0 14H40<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Que faire lorsque la temp\u00eate gronde? Les vieux loups de mer vous r\u00e9pondront: on ferme les \u00e9coutilles. La temp\u00eate, pour le Pentagone, c’est manifestement les menaces de r\u00e9forme qu’on entend gronder un peu partout, les informations diverses qui circulent sur les avatars dont souffre ce m\u00eame Pentagone, les analyses qui expliquent les erreurs du Pentagone,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4996,2826,3015,7921,3100,250,1012,6521,610],"class_list":["post-70721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cdi","tag-censure","tag-communication","tag-dick","tag-information","tag-jsf","tag-lind","tag-moby","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70721\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}