{"id":70808,"date":"2009-06-04T14:17:12","date_gmt":"2009-06-04T14:17:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/06\/04\/usa-entre-cuba-si-et-cuba-no-finalement-cest-cuba-si\/"},"modified":"2009-06-04T14:17:12","modified_gmt":"2009-06-04T14:17:12","slug":"usa-entre-cuba-si-et-cuba-no-finalement-cest-cuba-si","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/06\/04\/usa-entre-cuba-si-et-cuba-no-finalement-cest-cuba-si\/","title":{"rendered":"USA entre Cuba Si<\/em> et Cuba No<\/em>, \u2013 finalement, c’est Cuba Si<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’Organisations des Etats Am\u00e9ricains (Organization of American States, ou OAS) a prononc\u00e9 la r\u00e9int\u00e9gration de Cuba dans ses rangs, dans un vote \u00e9videmment historique qui, selon les initiateurs de la mesure, cl\u00f4t la Guerre froide. Vingt ans pour clore le chapitre, ce n’est pas rien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSelon Huffington.Post<\/em> du 3 juin 2009<\/a>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe Organization of American States voted by acclamation on Wednesday to revoke the 1962 measure suspending communist Cuba, overturning a landmark of the Cold War in the hemisphere. The Cold War has ended this day in San Pedro Sula, said Honduran President Manuel Zelaya immediately following the announcement. We begin a new era of fraternity and tolerance.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe action doesn’t mean Cuba will return to the 34-member body that helps coordinate policies and mediates disputes throughout the Americas. Cuban officials have repeatedly insisted they have no interest in returning to an organization they consider a tool of the United States. And if Cuba changes its mind, the agreement calls for a process of dialogue in line with OAS practices, proposals and principles a veiled allusion to agreements on human rights and democracy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThis is a moment of rejoicing for all of Latin America, Ecuador’s Foreign Minister Fander Falconi told reporters after the session.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe decision was taken by consensus, meaning the United States accepted it, though Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had lobbied personally for requiring Cuba to make democratic reforms and improve respect for human rights. The historic action taken today eliminates a distraction from the past and allows us to focus on the realities of today, State Department Deputy Spokesman Robert Wood said in Washington.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEffectivement, l’une des premi\u00e8res choses int\u00e9ressantes dans cette d\u00e9cision de toutes les fa\u00e7ons historique, c’est d’identifier ce que fut l’action US durant cette r\u00e9union. Au d\u00e9part, la position US \u00e9tait, ou semblait \u00eatre de ne pas accepter la r\u00e9int\u00e9gration de Cuba sans engagements de ce m\u00eame Cuba au niveau des droits de l’homme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSteve Clemons, de The Washington Note<\/em>, qui est un chaud partisan de l’abandon de toutes les mesures de contrainte et d’ostracisme \u00e0 l’encontre de Cuba, y compris la lev\u00e9e de l’embargo US, acclamait le 3 juin 2009<\/a>, \u00e0 15H30, heure de Washington, la d\u00e9cision qui allait \u00eatre prise, alors que ce n’\u00e9tait pas encore formellement le cas. Il notait \u00e0 cet instant:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abI just heard the Chilean representative issue particular thanks to the delegation of the United States for rallying around this consensus<\/em> [on Cuba].<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe United States had been pressuring the OAS for weeks to condition Cuba’s readmission to the hemispheric group on democratic principles and commitment to human rights. Falcone said there will be no such conditions. This is a new proposal, it has no conditions of any kind,’ Falcone said. That suspension was made in the Cold War, in the language of the Cold War. What we have done here is fix a historic error.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s, Clemons encha\u00eenait en s’attachant \u00e0 observer et \u00e0 commenter l’attitude US. En effet, son commentaire semble contenir une appr\u00e9ciation d’un jeu assez complexe des USA, de Hillary Clinton, entre ce que fut l’attitude officielle US et ce que fut l’attitude r\u00e9elle US \u00e0 propos de ce vote<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThis is significant. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looked uncomfortable during the proceedings as she apparently wanted conditions attached to any petition for Cuba to rejoin the OAS but failed. But this may have been just an act.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBehind the scenes, this initiative had help from Clinton’s team and would not have moved forward if the United States didn’t give a strong positive nod in acknowledging and acquiescing to the expectations of other Latin American states on this Cuba question.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThis is excellent news and demonstrates Obama’s willingness to replace inertia and incrementalism with some serious strategic shifts.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCes diverses indications montrent effectivement un ensemble de manuvres US pour finalement parvenir \u00e0 un soutien de la d\u00e9cision de l’Organisation sans pour autant sembler l’avoir soutenue officiellement, dans tous les cas initialement. Bien \u00e9videmment la d\u00e9cision de l’OAS ne tranche pas tous les aspects du cas cubain par rapport aux USA, et par rapport \u00e0 la situation de l’Am\u00e9rique Latine en fonction des interf\u00e9rences US. Le jugement d’une OAS comme instrument de la politique US en Am\u00e9rique Latine reste valable pour certains, quoique le vote d’hier sugg\u00e9rerait de nuancer un peu le jugement, quoique (bis) certains jugeraient qu’il s’agit en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 d’une habile manuvre des USA pour pi\u00e9ger Cuba et ainsi de suite Vieille habitude des interpr\u00e9tations o\u00f9 il s’agit de faire compliqu\u00e9 pour ne pas para\u00eetre faire trop simple.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl reste le fait politique qui, lui, se juge en termes d’effets et en termes simples, et l’on comprend bien dans quel sens. Le fait politique appara\u00eet comme une \u00e9tape importante dans la situation collective de l’Am\u00e9rique Latine, comme un acte collectif d’affirmation des pays du continent, vis-\u00e0-vis des USA mais peut-\u00eatre pas compl\u00e8tement en d\u00e9pit des USA (ou contre les USA). Comme d’habitude depuis quelques mois, il y a l’ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 de la politique de l’administration Obama, telle que bien sugg\u00e9r\u00e9e par Clemons: officiellement plut\u00f4t contre la r\u00e9int\u00e9gration sans conditions, finalement plut\u00f4t pour que plut\u00f4t contre. Le tout pourrait \u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par l’administration Obama comme une obligation o\u00f9 se sont trouv\u00e9s les USA de finalement rejoindre la majorit\u00e9 en faveur de la r\u00e9int\u00e9gration sans conditions pour ne pas \u00eatre isol\u00e9s, alors qu’en sous-main elle aurait favoris\u00e9 cette r\u00e9int\u00e9gration. Dans ce cas, il s’agirait d’une attitude essentiellement dict\u00e9e par la crainte qu’un soutien officiel initial d\u00e9clencherait des r\u00e9actions violentes aux USA, dans les milieux adversaire \u00e0 tout compromis avec Cuba. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 4 juin 2009 \u00e0 14H22<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’Organisations des Etats Am\u00e9ricains (Organization of American States, ou OAS) a prononc\u00e9 la r\u00e9int\u00e9gration de Cuba dans ses rangs, dans un vote \u00e9videmment historique qui, selon les initiateurs de la mesure, cl\u00f4t la Guerre froide. Vingt ans pour clore le chapitre, ce n’est pas rien. Selon Huffington.Post du 3 juin 2009: \u00abThe Organization of American… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6179,934,4470,3278,5080,7016],"class_list":["post-70808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-clemons","tag-clinton","tag-cuba","tag-hillary","tag-oas","tag-reintegration"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70808"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70808\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}