{"id":70845,"date":"2009-06-20T10:22:01","date_gmt":"2009-06-20T10:22:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/06\/20\/bho-a-au-moins-un-admirateur-ron-paul\/"},"modified":"2009-06-20T10:22:01","modified_gmt":"2009-06-20T10:22:01","slug":"bho-a-au-moins-un-admirateur-ron-paul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/06\/20\/bho-a-au-moins-un-admirateur-ron-paul\/","title":{"rendered":"BHO a au moins un admirateur: Ron Paul"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Comme \u00e0 l&rsquo;habitude, les parlementaires US se sont aussit\u00f4t dress\u00e9s contre l&rsquo;infamie. (On vous parle de l&rsquo;Iran, <em>of course<\/em>.) Aussi vite fait, des r\u00e9solutions ont \u00e9t\u00e9 vot\u00e9es, avec des majorit\u00e9 type <em>Politburo<\/em>. On ne transige pas avec la libert\u00e9. La Chambre a ainsi vot\u00e9 \u00e0 plus de 400 voix en faveur de la r\u00e9solution qui soulage d&rsquo;autant le peuple opprim\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCela nous permet d&rsquo;entendre une voix discordante, un peu toujours la m\u00eame, qui est celle, sans surprise, de Ron Paul. Le voici qui explique, dans un discours \u00e0 la Chambre, pourquoi il vote contre la r\u00e9solution. Nous nous r\u00e9f\u00e9rons \u00e0 des extraits du discours, notamment sur <em>Antiwar.com<\/em> ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/blog\/2009\/06\/19\/ron-paul-on-the-house-iran-resolution\/\" class=\"gen\">19 juillet 2009<\/a>. (Les commentaires des lecteurs sont int\u00e9ressants).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNous empruntons une partie de ces extraits, qui disent la sagesse m\u00eame.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>I rise in reluctant opposition to H Res 560, which condemns the Iranian government for its recent actions during the unrest in that country. While I never condone violence, much less the violence that governments are only too willing to mete out to their own citizens, I am always very cautious about condemning the actions of governments overseas. As an elected member of the United States House of Representatives, I have always questioned our constitutional authority to sit in judgment of the actions of foreign governments of which we are not representatives. I have always hesitated when my colleagues rush to pronounce final judgment on events thousands of miles away about which we know very little. And we know very little beyond limited press reports about what is happening in Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Of course I do not support attempts by foreign governments to suppress the democratic aspirations of their people, but when is the last time we condemned Saudi Arabia or Egypt or the many other countries where unlike in Iran there is no opportunity to exercise any substantial vote on political leadership? It seems our criticism is selective and applied when there are political points to be made. I have admired President Obama&rsquo;s cautious approach to the situation in Iran and I would have preferred that we in the House had acted similarly.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe qui nous int\u00e9resse particuli\u00e8rement, bien s\u00fbr, c&rsquo;est l&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciation de Ron Paul, le r\u00e9publicain libertarien, sur la politique d&rsquo;Obama, le pr\u00e9sident d\u00e9mocrate, que nous pourrions d\u00e9crire apr\u00e8s tout comme une connivence de sagesse: \u00ab<em>I have admired President Obama&rsquo;s cautious approach to the situation in Iran and I would have preferred that we in the House had acted similarly.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 20 juin 2009 \u00e0 10H27<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Comme \u00e0 l&rsquo;habitude, les parlementaires US se sont aussit\u00f4t dress\u00e9s contre l&rsquo;infamie. (On vous parle de l&rsquo;Iran, of course.) Aussi vite fait, des r\u00e9solutions ont \u00e9t\u00e9 vot\u00e9es, avec des majorit\u00e9 type Politburo. On ne transige pas avec la libert\u00e9. La Chambre a ainsi vot\u00e9 \u00e0 plus de 400 voix en faveur de la r\u00e9solution qui&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8002,3359,2773,3140,3310],"class_list":["post-70845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bho","tag-chambre","tag-iran","tag-paul","tag-ron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70845\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}