{"id":70947,"date":"2009-07-29T12:07:53","date_gmt":"2009-07-29T12:07:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/07\/29\/on-inaugure-le-f-35c-dans-une-extreme-nervosite\/"},"modified":"2009-07-29T12:07:53","modified_gmt":"2009-07-29T12:07:53","slug":"on-inaugure-le-f-35c-dans-une-extreme-nervosite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/07\/29\/on-inaugure-le-f-35c-dans-une-extreme-nervosite\/","title":{"rendered":"On inaugure le F-35C dans une extr\u00eame nervosit\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Dans le (petit) monde de l&rsquo;information de d\u00e9fense \u00e9tendu \u00e0 Internet, le site <em>DoDBuzz.com<\/em> a acquis une r\u00e9putation. D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, il soutient les initiatives du secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense US Robert Gates. Ainsi, dans la guerre des avions de combat qui fait rage au Pentagone, le site a fortement appuy\u00e9 la liquidation du F-22 et a sembl\u00e9 plut\u00f4t favorable au JSF (F-35). Mais cette faveur est conditionnelle, comme elle commence \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00eatre aujourd&rsquo;hui au niveau officiel. On s&rsquo;en aper\u00e7oit par la couverture que Colin Clark, journaliste-vedette du site, fait de l&rsquo;inauguration du premier mod\u00e8le de la version embarqu\u00e9e (U.S. Navy) du JSF, le F-35C, \u00e0 Fort Worth, \u00e0 l&rsquo;usine de Lockheed Martin (LM) qui produit le JSF. L&rsquo;on peut d&rsquo;ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 sugg\u00e9rer la conclusion que l&rsquo;atmosph\u00e8re officielle entourant le JSF est devenue, en quelques jours, incontestablement nerveuse.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans deux articles successifs, Clark nous restitue cette nervosit\u00e9 au travers de diverses indications obtenues par lui, ou appr\u00e9ciation des c\u00e9r\u00e9monies officielles. (A noter que Clark prend bien soin dans deux articles de mettre les choses au point vis-\u00e0-vis de LM, de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 ne laisser subsister aucune ambigu\u00eft\u00e9; l\u00e0 aussi, on se met bien en position: \u00ab<em>Full disclosure: Lockheed Martin flew myself and some other journalists to Fort Worth for the event on one of their planes and put us up at a h\u00f4tel<\/em>\u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Le point le plus s\u00e9rieux mis en \u00e9vidence par Clark, c&rsquo;est un tr\u00e8s s\u00e9v\u00e8re avertissement du chef d&rsquo;\u00e9tat-major de la marine (Chief of Naval Operations, ou CNO), lanc\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;intention de LM (ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dodbuzz.com\/2009\/07\/28\/heinz-smacks-pratt-over-f-135-costs\/\" class=\"gen\">28 juillet 2009<\/a>), au cours de la c\u00e9r\u00e9monie de pr\u00e9sentation du F-35C. Il est probable qu&rsquo;on n&rsquo;a jamais entendu un discours si incisif \u00e0 l&rsquo;inauguration d&rsquo;un mod\u00e8le d&rsquo;un programme de cette importance; les discours sont, d&rsquo;habitude, sur le mod\u00e8le d&rsquo;une pompeuse glorification de la puissance am\u00e9ricaniste et de l&rsquo;excellence de l&rsquo;industrie de d\u00e9fense<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The Navy&rsquo;s top officer, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Gary Roughead, used the roll-out ceremony of the carrier version of the Joint Strike Fighter to send a stark message about the planes to Lockheed Martin and its suppliers: They must  they absolutely must  be delivered on time and on budget.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The reason is simple. The Navy&rsquo;s F\/A-18s are being flown at higher rates than originally planned and they are wearing out. Several senior defense lawmakers have been pressing the Navy to admit to a fighter gap and commit to buying more F\/A-18s but the service has essentially pointed to the F-35C and said, we are buying that plane and it will be on time. Roughead noted this during his roll-out speech, saying the F-35 will relieve our aircraft as they age out.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Dans le m\u00eame article, Clark rel\u00e8ve, selon un entretien qu&rsquo;il a eu avec le directeur du JSF Program Office, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du Corps des Marines Heinz, que ce dernier entend faire pression sur Pratt &#038; Whitney pour que le moteur F135 du JSF ait une carri\u00e8re un peu moins erratique et co\u00fbteuse que celle qu&rsquo;il a eue jusqu&rsquo;ici. \u00ab<em>In other JSF news, the program&rsquo;s top officer, Marine Brig. Gen. David Heinz, took Pratt and Whitney to task for quality control problems with its F-135 engine that have resulted in up to 50 percent of parts being thrown away because they do not meet the high standards required by the JSF program. I am pushing very hard on Pratt to do better, Heinz told me when I asked him about cost increases in the engine program. He said he expects to improve to the point where 80 percent of parts meet his standards<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Une autre nouvelle, \u00e9galement du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dodbuzz.com\/2009\/07\/29\/lockmar-defends-jsf-against-jet\/\" class=\"gen\">28 juillet 2009<\/a>, nous rapporte que LM r\u00e9agit avec vigueur \u00e0 toutes ces vilaines nouvelles concernant <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-jet_versus_jsf_25_07_2009.html\" class=\"gen\">le rapport<\/a> de l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe JET. Clark cite un officiel de LM, le vice-pr\u00e9sident en charge du programme F-35, Dan Cowley. L&rsquo;argument est simplement que l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe JET se trompe, qu&rsquo;elle est mal inform\u00e9e, qu&rsquo;elle utilise des donn\u00e9es d\u00e9pass\u00e9es, qu&rsquo;elle n&rsquo;a pas r\u00e9alis\u00e9 que le JSF est un programme d&rsquo;un nouveau type, que tout va bien, etc. Clark signale que Cowley doit aujourd&rsquo;hui \u00eatre entendu par un a\u00e9ropage d&rsquo;officiels du Pentagone pour d\u00e9montrer pourquoi le JSF n&rsquo;est pas en retard de deux ans, comme l&rsquo;affirme JET (Cowley \u00ab<em> outlined the arguments he will present Wednesday to OSD&rsquo;s Program Analysis and Evaluation office, the Joint Evaluation Team, and the Cost Improvement and Analysis Group about why the program is not an additional two years behind schedule.<\/em>\u00bb) En gros, Cowley devrait dire ceci, selon Clark:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Boil all this down and Crowley said he believes the JET is judging JSF by the false standards of past programs because they don&rsquo;t have data from programs managed as JSF is being developed and managed. They are being conservative, in effect, because they don&rsquo;t how else to be until the JSF program proves them wrong. We&rsquo;ll see who&rsquo;s right and whether JET, PA and E and the CAIG believe the Joint Strike Fighter Program is flying the right course.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tD&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, sans se perdre dans les arguments divers, on doit constater un r\u00e9el raidissement des diverses autorit\u00e9s du Pentagone vis-\u00e0-vis de LM,  y compris, des complices du JPO eux-m\u00eames. L&rsquo;avertissement du CNO, m\u00eame s&rsquo;il pr\u00e9sente comme raison officielle la crainte d&rsquo;un sous-\u00e9quipement de l&rsquo;a\u00e9ronavale en cas de retard du F-35C, constitue \u00e9galement une mise en garde indirecte s\u00e9v\u00e8re de l&rsquo;U.S. Navy lanc\u00e9e \u00e0 LM sur le fondement m\u00eame des capacit\u00e9s du constructeur \u00e0 produire le F-35. Il est clair que nous entrons dans la zone des temp\u00eates pour le JSF, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire la p\u00e9riode (qui risque d&rsquo;ailleurs d&rsquo;\u00eatre tr\u00e8s longue et de conna\u00eetre des p\u00e9rip\u00e9ties int\u00e9ressantes) o\u00f9 le pouvoir civil, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire l&rsquo;administration Obama install\u00e9e au Pentagone, va tenter de reprendre le contr\u00f4le du programme et d&rsquo;\u00e9valuer son \u00e9tat exact. Dans cette affaire, des alliances diverses vont s&rsquo;\u00e9baucher, avec des int\u00e9r\u00eats divers qui interdisent qu&rsquo;on puisse recourir \u00e0 un sch\u00e9matisme simpliste (bureaucratie contre administration, JPO contre secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense, etc.). C&rsquo;est une guerre civile qui commence.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans tous les cas, on doit juger qu&rsquo;il se confirme que le retour du rapport du JET, qu&rsquo;on pensait enterr\u00e9e dans les oubliettes, indique bien une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-bho_jet_et_jsf_a_la_recherche_de_la_realite_29_07_2009.html\" class=\"gen\">mobilisation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale<\/a>. Le groupe JET est certainement appel\u00e9 \u00e0 jouer un r\u00f4le important \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur du Pentagone, dans la bataille du JSF.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 29 juillet 2009 \u00e0 12H14<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans le (petit) monde de l&rsquo;information de d\u00e9fense \u00e9tendu \u00e0 Internet, le site DoDBuzz.com a acquis une r\u00e9putation. D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, il soutient les initiatives du secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense US Robert Gates. Ainsi, dans la guerre des avions de combat qui fait rage au Pentagone, le site a fortement appuy\u00e9 la liquidation du F-22&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2880,3168,8514,8515,2969,7525,2645,8368,8500,250,3501,3502,3319,3194,2671],"class_list":["post-70947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-civile","tag-clark","tag-cno","tag-dodbuzz","tag-f-35","tag-f-35c","tag-guerre","tag-heinz","tag-jet","tag-jsf","tag-lockheed","tag-martin","tag-navy","tag-pentagone","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70947"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70947\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}