{"id":70985,"date":"2009-08-13T13:53:45","date_gmt":"2009-08-13T13:53:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/08\/13\/details-sur-les-700-milliards-pour-sauver-wall-street\/"},"modified":"2009-08-13T13:53:45","modified_gmt":"2009-08-13T13:53:45","slug":"details-sur-les-700-milliards-pour-sauver-wall-street","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/08\/13\/details-sur-les-700-milliards-pour-sauver-wall-street\/","title":{"rendered":"D\u00e9tails sur les $700 milliards pour sauver Wall Street"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955; font-size:1.65em; font-variant:small-caps\">D\u00e9tails sur les $700 milliards pour sauver Wall Street<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Bon, certes, c&rsquo;\u00e9tait <em>in illo tempore<\/em>. Aujourd&rsquo;hui, si vous ne parlez pas au bas mot de $2 ou $3<em>trillions<\/em> ($2.000 ou $3.000 milliards), vous \u00eates un plaisantin. Nous, &ndash; \u00ab\u00a0nous vous parlons d&rsquo;un temps que les moins de 8 mois ne peuvent pas conna&icirc;tre\u00a0\u00bb, &ndash; le temps de \u00ab\u00a0la boh\u00eame\u00a0\u00bb, o&ugrave; $700 milliards cela \u00ab\u00a0faisait sens\u00a0\u00bb, comme on dit. Cela se passait en septembre 2008, quand le secr\u00e9taire Hank Paulson prit le monde et Washington D.C. \u00e0 la gorge, pour r\u00e9clamer, <em>illico presto<\/em>, $700 milliards pour sauver les banques. \u00ab\u00a0Sauver les banques\u00a0\u00bb, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire&hellip;? $700 milliards pour racheter les affreux \u00ab\u00a0<em>toxic assets<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb qui attaqu\u00e8rent la vertu pourtant impeccable et implacable du syst\u00e8me financier am\u00e9ricaniste. Les $700 milliards, c&rsquo;\u00e9tait donc pour liquider les \u00ab\u00a0<em>toxic assets<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Eh bien, en v\u00e9rit\u00e9, nous dit <em>Huffington.Post<\/em>, reproduisant une \u00e9mission sur MSNBC, le <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2009\/08\/12\/elizabeth-warren-talks-to_n_257488.html\">12 ao&ucirc;t 2009<\/a>, selon les termes m\u00eames de la pr\u00e9sidente du comit\u00e9 sp\u00e9cialement mis en place par le Congr\u00e8s pour surveiller le sauvetage des banques, la professeur de droit de Harvard Elizabeth Warren, personne ne sait rien de ce qui s&rsquo;est pass\u00e9. C&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire, personne dans le comit\u00e9 qu&rsquo;elle pr\u00e9side, par cons\u00e9quent officiellement au Congr\u00e8s, sans doute aussi dans l&rsquo;administration. La seule chose que sait Warren, c&rsquo;est que la plupart des \u00ab\u00a0<em>toxic assets<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb sont toujours l\u00e0, dans la comptabilit\u00e9 des banques. Que s&rsquo;est-il pass\u00e9? La politique d&rsquo;information (?) suivie par les pouvoirs (?) publics, Congr\u00e8s compris, vis-\u00e0-vis du suivi de l&rsquo;utilisation d&rsquo;une bonne partie de ces $700 milliards, se r\u00e9f\u00e8re \u00e0 la politique dite du \u00ab\u00a0<em>don&rsquo;t ask, don&rsquo;t tell<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb (je ne demande rien, on ne me dit rien), &ndash; fameux compromis en 1993 de l&rsquo;administration Clinton pour d\u00e9finir la nouvelle \u00ab\u00a0politique\u00a0\u00bb du Pentagone vis-\u00e0-vis des homosexuels dans les forces arm\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&laquo;<em>Elizabeth Warren, the chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel charged with monitoring the bank bailout, appeared on MSNBC this morning to talk toxic assets. On Joe Scarborough&rsquo;s Morning Joe, Warren warned of the hard-to-price assets that are still lingering on many bank&rsquo;s balance sheets. \u00ab\u00a0By and large, the toxic assets that brought us to this point are still on the books of the banks,\u00a0\u00bb she said.<\/em> [&hellip;]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>&raquo;<em>Roughly half of the $700 billion bailout, Warren added, was &quot;don&rsquo;t ask, don&rsquo;t tell money. We didn&rsquo;t ask how they were going to spend it, and they didn&rsquo;t tell how they were going to spend it.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Pour le reste, dans cette \u00e9mission, Warren nous a dit qu&rsquo;elle craint une nouvelle crise, dans le domaine du cr\u00e9dit commercial, avec des situations tr\u00e8s difficiles pour les banques en-dessous du calibre des plantureux g\u00e9ants de Wall Street, actuellement couverts de $milliards.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Quant \u00e0 son avis sur l&rsquo;action de l&rsquo;actuel secr\u00e9taire au tr\u00e9sor Genthner dans l&rsquo;utilisation du \u00ab\u00a0<em>stimulus<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb de $787 milliards destin\u00e9s \u00e0 la relance, elle l&rsquo;a aimablement compar\u00e9e aux techniques de joueurs \u00ab\u00a0\u00e0 l&rsquo;aveuglette\u00a0\u00bb de Las Vegas, qui \u00ab\u00a0saupoudre\u00a0\u00bb les tables de jeux avec leur mise fractionn\u00e9e : &laquo;<em>&hellip;comparing Geithner&rsquo;s handling of the bailout money to a certain style of casino gambling. Geithner, she said, was throwing smaller portions of bailout money at several economic pressure points. \u00ab\u00a0He&rsquo;s doing the sort of $2 bets all over the table in Vegas,\u00a0\u00bb Warren joked.<\/em>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 13 ao&ucirc;t 2009 \u00e0 13H59<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>D\u00e9tails sur les $700 milliards pour sauver Wall Street Bon, certes, c&rsquo;\u00e9tait in illo tempore. Aujourd&rsquo;hui, si vous ne parlez pas au bas mot de $2 ou $3trillions ($2.000 ou $3.000 milliards), vous \u00eates un plaisantin. Nous, &ndash; \u00ab\u00a0nous vous parlons d&rsquo;un temps que les moins de 8 mois ne peuvent pas conna&icirc;tre\u00a0\u00bb, &ndash; le&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8562,6713,8126,7024,3372,8561,3132,945],"class_list":["post-70985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-assets","tag-elisabeth","tag-geithner","tag-paulson","tag-street","tag-toxic","tag-wall","tag-warren"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70985\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}