{"id":71022,"date":"2009-08-31T04:45:22","date_gmt":"2009-08-31T04:45:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/08\/31\/la-loi-ron-paul-votee-en-octobre\/"},"modified":"2009-08-31T04:45:22","modified_gmt":"2009-08-31T04:45:22","slug":"la-loi-ron-paul-votee-en-octobre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/08\/31\/la-loi-ron-paul-votee-en-octobre\/","title":{"rendered":"La \u201cloi Ron Paul\u201d vot\u00e9e en octobre?"},"content":{"rendered":"

D’une fa\u00e7on assez discr\u00e8te, et, \u00e9galement, fort discr\u00e8tement rapport\u00e9e par la presse-Pravda<\/em>, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate Barney Franks, pr\u00e9sident de la Commission des Finances de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants, a annonc\u00e9 que la loi HR 1207<\/a>, que nous d\u00e9signons volontiers sous le surnom de loi Ron Paul, devrait \u00eatre vot\u00e9e en octobre. (La loi HR 1207 constitue une loi d’audit<\/em> de la Federal Reserve, destin\u00e9e \u00e0 rendre publiques les activit\u00e9s et les diverses initiatives de cet organisme tout-puissant, particuli\u00e8rement secret dans ses activit\u00e9s alors qu’il r\u00e9gule fondamentalement la politique mon\u00e9taire des USA en soutenant Wall Street. Il s’agit du r\u00f4le classique de Banque centrale alors qu’il s’agit dans les faits d’une institution priv\u00e9e, que ses activit\u00e9s sont totalement incontr\u00f4l\u00e9es par le pouvoir l\u00e9gislatif et totalement dissimul\u00e9es au public.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’annonce a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite lors d’un meeting r\u00e9gional sur la question des soins de sant\u00e9, dans le Massachusetts, donc d’une fa\u00e7on anodine, en r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 une question de l’auditoire. Franks a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu’il avait l’intention de pousser fortement pour le vote de cette loi, qui dispose d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 du soutien de plus de la majorit\u00e9 de la Chambre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’intervention de Franks est rapport\u00e9e par Ryan Grim, dans HuffingtonPost<\/em>, le 28 ao\u00fbt 2009<\/a>. L’intervention de Franks montre une r\u00e9elle chaleur de ses relations avec Ron Paul, qui a acquis, avec cette loi, une popularit\u00e9 et une autorit\u00e9 incontestables au sein de la Chambre, d\u00e9passant largement ses appartenances partisane et id\u00e9ologique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe bill to audit the Fed, H.R. 1207, was introduced by libertarian Fed critic Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and is backed by well over a majority of the House. Frank’s comment suggests it won’t just be left to languish in committee.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI want to restrict the power of the Fed in a number of ways, said Frank in response to a question about the bill. They have had since 1932… the right to intervene in the economy almost whenever they wanted to, Frank said, noting that the Fed relied on its extraordinary lending power to forward billions to financial institutions last fall. He intends to curtail that lending power, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbFinally we will subject them to a complete audit, he said. I have been working with Ron Paul, the main sponsor of that bill. He agrees that we don’t want to have the audit appear as if it is influencing monetary policy, because that would be inflationary and Ron and I agree on that.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbOne of the things the audit will show is what the Federal Reserve buys and sells, and that will be made public, Frank said. But not instantly, because… you would have a lot of people trading off of that, and you would have too much impact on the market. Again Ron agrees with that, so we will probably have that data released after a time period of several months, enough time so it wouldn’t be market-sensitive. That will be part of the overall Fed regulation that we are inducting.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe questioner followed up: By the end of the year? The House will pass it probably in October, said Frank.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Un vote par la Chambre d’une loi de cette importance devrait avoir des cons\u00e9quences tr\u00e8s rapides sur le S\u00e9nat, o\u00f9 une loi du m\u00eame type est en discussion, sous la f\u00e9rule d’un s\u00e9nateur socialiste<\/a>, Sanders du Vermont \u00abHouse passage will put pressure on the Senate to act. The upper chamber has had a similar bipartisan coming-together, with Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a socialist, and Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), as far from a socialist as imaginable, cosponsoring a version of Paul’s bill.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t L’opposition \u00e0 cette loi, toujours aussi feutr\u00e9e tant la question est d\u00e9licate et d’une sensibilit\u00e9 extr\u00eame, est toujours aussi forte. Elle vient des m\u00eames milieux les banques, Wall Street, la finance et, bien entendu, la Fed<\/em> elle-m\u00eame. Tout cela se fait dans un climat par ailleurs tendu par certaines tentatives de la justice d’entamer le monopole d’absolue opacit\u00e9 de la Federal Reserve. \u00abWall Street has been pushing back against opening up the Fed. A federal judge recently ordered it to disclose who the bank is lending to and what collateral it’s getting in return. The Fed is appealing, arguing that such disclosure would damage it and the banks receiving the loans. The Clearing House Association, a coalition of financial industry players, joined the Fed in protesting the decision.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl est vrai que, dans ce syst\u00e8me, le silence et la discr\u00e9tion sont les indices les plus assur\u00e9s de l’importance d’une affaire, lorsque cette affaire affecte une institution de l’importance de la Fed<\/em>. La loi Ron Paul, qui progresse sans tapage, a un potentiel r\u00e9volutionnaire. Son soutien \u00e0 la Chambre est l’une des marques des marges impr\u00e9visibles et incontr\u00f4lables des activit\u00e9s de cette assembl\u00e9e. La Chambre, effectivement, peut s’emporter pour des cas qui apparaissent soudain r\u00e9volutionnaires par rapport aux normes du syst\u00e8me, et Ron Paul a su parfaitement jouer de ce r\u00e9flexe \u00e0 l’avantage de son initiative. HR 1207 n’a plus rien d’une loi partisane (d’un parti), ni d’une loi d’une conception id\u00e9ologique. Elle est soutenue par un \u00e9ventail partisan et id\u00e9ologique le plus large possible. L’habilet\u00e9 de Ron Paul est d’\u00eatre \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s parvenu \u00e0 faire de HR 1207 un projet de loi o\u00f9 la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants engage sa sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 et ce qu’elle pr\u00e9tend \u00eatre son originalit\u00e9, son c\u00f4t\u00e9 populiste. Cette situation est pour l’instant fort peu r\u00e9percut\u00e9e, comme on l’a not\u00e9, mais si HR 1207 est vot\u00e9e on entendra parler de la chose.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 31 ao\u00fbt 2009 \u00e0 04H53<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

D’une fa\u00e7on assez discr\u00e8te, et, \u00e9galement, fort discr\u00e8tement rapport\u00e9e par la presse-Pravda, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate Barney Franks, pr\u00e9sident de la Commission des Finances de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants, a annonc\u00e9 que la loi HR 1207, que nous d\u00e9signons volontiers sous le surnom de loi Ron Paul, devrait \u00eatre vot\u00e9e en octobre. (La loi HR 1207… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8611,8337,8587,3359,2604,5393,948,8610,3140,6381,4207,3310],"class_list":["post-71022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-8611","tag-audit","tag-barney","tag-chambre","tag-des","tag-federal","tag-franks","tag-hr","tag-paul","tag-representants","tag-reserve","tag-ron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}