{"id":71023,"date":"2009-08-31T04:57:14","date_gmt":"2009-08-31T04:57:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/08\/31\/lisolement-paranoiaque-de-netanyahou\/"},"modified":"2009-08-31T04:57:14","modified_gmt":"2009-08-31T04:57:14","slug":"lisolement-paranoiaque-de-netanyahou","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2009\/08\/31\/lisolement-paranoiaque-de-netanyahou\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;isolement (parano\u00efaque) de Netanyahou"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le premier ministre isra\u00e9lien Netanyahou a effectu\u00e9 une visite en Angleterre, o\u00f9 il a laiss\u00e9 derri\u00e8re lui des traces profondes d&rsquo;amertume et des critiques graves. L&rsquo;aspect remarquable de l&rsquo;affaire est que l&rsquo;amertume et les critiques viennent principalement, voire exclusivement, de la communaut\u00e9 juive britannique. <em>The Independent<\/em> publie un article sur cette affaire le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/media\/press\/netanyahu-doesnt-care-what-britain-thinks-of-israel-1779391.html\" class=\"gen\">30 ao\u00fbt 2009<\/a>. La cause en est le refus syst\u00e9matique de Netanayahou de donner l&rsquo;une ou l&rsquo;autre conf\u00e9rence de presse pour informer le public britannique de la position d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl, et toute autre manifestation de ce genre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;attaque principale est venue du directeur du <em>Jewish Chronicle<\/em>, Stephen Pollard, qui \u00e9crit dans un commentaire publi\u00e9 dans sa revue: \u00ab<em>The truth of it is that for all they moan about coverage of the Middle East, they don&rsquo;t actually care. They don&rsquo;t care if Brits end up thinking they are warmongers. They don&rsquo;t care if they are losing the PR war. And they don&rsquo;t care if those of us who do care are left fuming at their wilful refusal to do anything to help us counter Israel&rsquo;s appalling image.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>The Independent<\/em> rapporte que cette opinion est tr\u00e8s largement partag\u00e9e par les dirigeants de la communaut\u00e9 juive britannique, qui critiquent fortement la politique de non-communication du Premier ministre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Mr Netanyahu&rsquo;s three-day trip included meetings with the Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, and President Barack Obama&rsquo;s special envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, as well as a visit to the Palestine Exploration Fund. But Mr Pollard&rsquo;s view that the Israeli leader&rsquo;s refusal to speak on the record to the British press, aside from a blink-and-you-missed-it-stage-managed press conf\u00e9rence in Downing Street, was a wasted PR opportunity has received widespread support.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Rabbi Danny Rich, the chief executive of Liberal Judaism, the third-largest sector of the Jewish community in this country, said the failure to invite some senior members of the Jewish community  himself included  to meet Mr Netanyahu or his officials was like shooting yourself in the foot in the media war. The embassy of the State of Israel wants and expects the Jewish community to understand and to be advocates of its position in Britain, said Rabbi Rich. This clearly needs to be a partnership between the embassy and the representatives of the State of Israel and leaders of the Jewish community. The presence of the Israeli Prime Minister in Great Britain would have been a good opportunity to build that partnership and it was missed.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa meilleure explication de l&rsquo;attitude de Netanyahou vient certainement de Monroe Palmer, pr\u00e9sident des <em>Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel<\/em>. Palmer \u00ab<em>said the country should have lost no opportunity to put its case and that some Israelis were so committed to fighting for Israel&rsquo;s security and its future that they sometimes, or very often, underestimated the power of the press and international opinion.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCette interpr\u00e9tation rejoint en effet l&rsquo;attitude parano\u00efaque de Netanyahou et des dirigeants isra\u00e9liens, que nous avons d\u00e9j\u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-bibi_en_mode_parano-turbo_10_07_2009.html\" class=\"gen\">relev\u00e9e<\/a> \u00e0 plusieurs  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-la_paranoia_israelienne_contre_bho_ca_suit_son_cours_10_08_2009.html\" class=\"gen\">reprises<\/a>. Cette parano\u00efa implique effectivement une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-le_vide_strategique_d_israel_15_08_2009.html\" class=\"gen\">concentration<\/a> absolue, herm\u00e9tique, sur la question de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl de la fa\u00e7on la plus exclusive, et le d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat pour la pr\u00e9sentation et l&rsquo;explication publiques d&rsquo;une politique dont la pratique et les exc\u00e8s font un tort consid\u00e9rable \u00e0 l&rsquo;image d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl. Tout ce qui ne concerne pas directement et imm\u00e9diatement la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl est compl\u00e8tement ignor\u00e9 et laiss\u00e9 de c\u00f4t\u00e9; dans ce cas, l&rsquo;opinion britannique aussi bien que les relations avec les juifs britanniques. Il ne semble pas que l&rsquo;actuelle \u00e9quipe dirigeante isra\u00e9lienne soit capable de comprendre les effets d\u00e9vastateurs pour leur pays, en termes de perception et d&rsquo;influence, de cette attitude  mais c&rsquo;est l\u00e0 la manifestation la plus \u00e9vidente de la parano\u00efa.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 31 ao\u00fbt 2009 \u00e0 05H04<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le premier ministre isra\u00e9lien Netanyahou a effectu\u00e9 une visite en Angleterre, o\u00f9 il a laiss\u00e9 derri\u00e8re lui des traces profondes d&rsquo;amertume et des critiques graves. L&rsquo;aspect remarquable de l&rsquo;affaire est que l&rsquo;amertume et les critiques viennent principalement, voire exclusivement, de la communaut\u00e9 juive britannique. The Independent publie un article sur cette affaire le 30 ao\u00fbt&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3070,3703,2774,2987,2790,4756],"class_list":["post-71023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bibi","tag-britanniques","tag-israel","tag-juifs","tag-netanyahou","tag-paranoia"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71023\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}