Huffington.Post<\/em> reprenait Associated Press pour pr\u00e9senter la nouvelle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe poll, posted Saturday on Facebook, was taken off the popular social networking site quickly after company officials were alerted to its existence. But, like any threat against the president, Secret Service agents are taking no chances.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb\u00ab\u00a0We are aware of it and we will take the appropriate investigative steps, said Darrin Blackford, a Secret Service spokesman. We take of these things seriously. The poll asked respondents Should Obama be killed? The choices: No, Maybe, Yes, and Yes if he cuts my health care. The question was not created by Facebook, but by an independent person using an add-on application that has been suspended from the site.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe third-party application that enabled an individual user to create the offensive poll was brought to our attention this morning, said Barry Schnitt, Facebook’s spokesman for policy. Because the application was disabled, the responses to the nonscientific polls are not available. We’re working with the U.S. Secret Service, but they’ll need to provide any details of their investigation, Schnitt said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tCertes, en raison des facilit\u00e9s d’acc\u00e8s, de manipulation, etc., de cette sorte d’intervention, le cas pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 ici ne diff\u00e8re sans doute gu\u00e8re, en importance d’organisation, d’une d\u00e9marche de menace anonyme comme il y en parfois contre les pr\u00e9sidents US en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral et contre Obama en particulier, et cela particuli\u00e8rement dans la p\u00e9riode de crise et de tension actuelle. Mais il y a ici un aspect psychologique particuli\u00e8rement remarquable, outre le cas de l’emploi des techniques du r\u00e9seau pour cette sorte de d\u00e9marche. Psychologiquement, il s’agit bien de l’expression publique d’une id\u00e9e qu’on est inclin\u00e9 d’habitude \u00e0 tenir cach\u00e9e, ou \u00e0 dissimuler, et dont on chercherait plut\u00f4t dans ce cas \u00e0 faire la publicit\u00e9, y compris par la provocation. Il s’agit d’une expression qu’on qualifierait de publique au sens que permettent aujourd’hui les moyens de communication, d’un climat de tr\u00e8s grande tension, de tr\u00e8s grande col\u00e8re et de tr\u00e8s grande frustration, d’une conviction que ces sentiments doivent \u00eatre partag\u00e9s et d’une volont\u00e9 de ne pas dissimuler cette conviction. C’est un indice de plus, spectaculaire certes, de l’\u00e9tat de tension r\u00e9gnant aujourd’hui aux USA, et s’exprimant notamment mais puissamment contre la personne m\u00eame du pr\u00e9sident.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tLes r\u00e9actions individuelles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 extr\u00eamement nombreuses. En 12 heures, depuis que Huffington.Post<\/em> a mis la nouvelle en ligne, 4.731 commentaires de lecteurs \u00e9taient enregistr\u00e9s. L\u00e0 aussi, une indication de la sensibilit\u00e9 du public \u00e0 la possibilit\u00e9 d’\u00e9v\u00e9nements violents aux USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis eb ligne le 29 septembre 2009 \u00e0 06H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Emotion \u00e0 la suite d’un sondage mis en ligne sur Facebook et aussit\u00f4t l’objet d’une enqu\u00eate du Secret Service, charg\u00e9 de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident des USA. Le sondage, mis en ligne samedi, portait sur la question Should Obama be killed? (Obama devrait-il \u00eatre tu\u00e9?). Lorsque le Secret Service est intervenu et que le sondage… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[8715,6868,6208,3430,6008,7436,5190,5733,8714],"class_list":["post-71115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-facebook","tag-huffington","tag-obama","tag-post","tag-secret","tag-service","tag-sondage","tag-tension","tag-tuer"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}