{"id":71427,"date":"2010-01-13T04:47:41","date_gmt":"2010-01-13T04:47:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/01\/13\/le-vol-253-est-il-un-coup-tordu-hypotheses\/"},"modified":"2010-01-13T04:47:41","modified_gmt":"2010-01-13T04:47:41","slug":"le-vol-253-est-il-un-coup-tordu-hypotheses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/01\/13\/le-vol-253-est-il-un-coup-tordu-hypotheses\/","title":{"rendered":"Le vol 253 est-il un coup tordu? Hypoth\u00e8ses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h3>Le vol 253 est-il un coup tordu? Hypoth\u00e8ses<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tTom Burghardt est un activiste US, un vrai, avec une longue exp\u00e9rience. (Editeur de <em>Covert Action Quarterly<\/em> et de <em>Global Research<\/em>, publiant dans <em>The Dissident Voice<\/em>, <em>The Intelligence Daily<\/em> et <em>Pacific Free Press<\/em>, etc.) Dans <em>The Dissident Voice<\/em>, le 11 janvier 2010 (lien: <a href=\"http:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2010\/01\/flight-253-anatomy-of-a-cover-up\/\" class=\"gen\">http:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2010\/01\/flight-253-anatomy-of-a-cover-up\/<\/a>), Tom Burghardt diss\u00e8que le vol 253 (attentat manqu\u00e9 du 25 d\u00e9cembre 2009) en s&rsquo;attachant \u00e0 l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se g\u00e9n\u00e9rale qu&rsquo;il y a eu montage et manipulation (<em>cover-up<\/em>). Une foule d&rsquo;\u00e9l\u00e9ments, de contradictions, de citations, de d\u00e9clarations, etc. Beaucoup de faits, essentiellement des faits.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes hypoth\u00e8ses sur les diff\u00e9rentes possibilit\u00e9s de manipulation viennent en conclusion: s&rsquo;il y a montage ou manipulation, pourquoi et qui? Un point int\u00e9ressant, c&rsquo;est la perspective qu&rsquo;ouvre l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se concernant une action\/op\u00e9ration mont\u00e9e par un ou des groupes priv\u00e9es qu&rsquo;il d\u00e9finit sous le terme l&rsquo;industrie de s\u00e9curit\u00e9; des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 type-Blackwater, des r\u00e9seaux d&rsquo;anciens agents, officiers, soldats, etc., ayant op\u00e9r\u00e9 dans des conditions sp\u00e9ciales depuis 2001 (et avant, certes) et reconvertis dans l&rsquo;industrie de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 qui prend des dimensions impressionnantes aux USA. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>As of this writing, it is not yet possible to provide a comprehensive answer as to why these events unfolded as they did. I am however, certain of one thing: the Obama administration, the security agencies presumably under its control and the corporate media, johnny-on-the-spot when it comes to covering-up imperialism&rsquo;s multitude of crimes, are lying to the American people.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>There are however, several preliminary hypotheses which can be advanced, all of which raise further troubling questions worthy of additional investigation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Were the Christmas Day events a pretext to expand the War on Terror into yet another strategic petroleum chokepoint as analyst F. William Engdahl suggests in an excellent piece published by Global Research?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Nor can we dismiss out of hand the analysis offered by the World Socialist Web Site that the failed Christmas Day airline plot was a maneuver by extreme right-wing elements deeply embedded in the U.S. National Security State to destabilize and undermine the Obama administration. To this can be added Richard Wolffe&rsquo;s provocative statement that factions within the secret state may have had their own alternative agenda, and thus failed to act.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Add to the mix, the systematic outsourcing of intelligence and security functions to a host of giant defense firms, outside of democratic control; in other words, rightist grifters who answer to shareholders and not the American people, and suddenly another piece of Wolffe&rsquo;s alternative agenda comes into sharp focus.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Chock-a-block with ex-CIA officers, NSA analysts, FBI agents and U.S. Special Forces veterans of America&rsquo;s dirty wars who now staff the privatized U.S. security complex, in other words well-paid mercenaries who know a thing or two on how to run a clandestine operation, and we just might have another plausible theory why a dot or two was ignored Christmas Day.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le vol 253 est-il un coup tordu? Hypoth\u00e8ses Tom Burghardt est un activiste US, un vrai, avec une longue exp\u00e9rience. (Editeur de Covert Action Quarterly et de Global Research, publiant dans The Dissident Voice, The Intelligence Daily et Pacific Free Press, etc.) Dans The Dissident Voice, le 11 janvier 2010 (lien: http:\/\/dissidentvoice.org\/2010\/01\/flight-253-anatomy-of-a-cover-up\/), Tom Burghardt diss\u00e8que&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9068,9133,7291,6875,3050,5439,9134,4584],"class_list":["post-71427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-9068","tag-burghardt","tag-cover-up","tag-dissident","tag-the","tag-tom","tag-voice","tag-vol"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}