{"id":71443,"date":"2010-01-18T01:44:14","date_gmt":"2010-01-18T01:44:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/01\/18\/obama-a-la-moulinette\/"},"modified":"2010-01-18T01:44:14","modified_gmt":"2010-01-18T01:44:14","slug":"obama-a-la-moulinette","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/01\/18\/obama-a-la-moulinette\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama \u00e0 la moulinette"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h3>Obama \u00e0 la moulinette<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn texte remarquable de Marc S. Ellenbogen, de UPI, \u00e9galement pr\u00e9sidents de Global Panel Foundation et de la Prague Society, proche des d\u00e9mocrates US et notamment du pr\u00e9sident du parti d\u00e9mocrate Howard S. Dean. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une critique \u00e9poustouflante de brio et de justesse de la premi\u00e8re ann\u00e9e de la pr\u00e9sidence Obama, par un adversaire de GW Bush et des r\u00e9publicains, et un partisan du candidat Obama \u00e0 l&rsquo;automne 2008.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;analyse critique de la loi sur les soins de sant\u00e9 d&rsquo;Obama est remarquable. Celle de l&rsquo;attitude et du comportement politique et psychologique du pr\u00e9sident ne l&rsquo;est pas moins. Il y a des pr\u00e9cisions int\u00e9ressantes et r\u00e9v\u00e9latrice sur l&rsquo;amateurisme de cette administration, incroyablement lente \u00e0 constituer son personnel diplomatique et autre, et sur l&rsquo;entourage de d&rsquo;Obama lui-m\u00eame, semblant avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 constitu\u00e9 pour assurer le pr\u00e9sident de son brio personnel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tTexte UPI, via <em>Spacewar.com<\/em> du 7 janvier 2010 (au lien <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spacewar.com\/reports\/Atlantic_Eye_Lollygagging_along_999.html\" class=\"gen\">http:\/\/www.spacewar.com\/reports\/Atlantic_Eye_Lollygagging_along_999.html<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Frankly, Mr. President, I have had enough of your blathering.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAnd I was not even remotely a supporter of the Bush administration. But, you talk, and talk, and talk, and  well you get the point. You have little to show in your first year. And you have let the American people down.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I endorsed you in February 2008, when most of the Democratic establishment was standing behind Sen. Hillary Clinton. I spoke of your courage, your motivational skills and your fresh approach. I said you would take us in a new direction.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In your desperation to show you have done something, you had Congress push through a watered-down stepchild of your original healthcare plan. You sold the U.S. people healthcare; what you have delivered is some sort of contrivance. Normally, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck  it is a duck.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Well, Mr. President, your healthcare plan ain&rsquo;t no duck!<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>From Ruanda to Somalia; from Israel to the Palestinian territories; from Central Europe to the Caucasus; from North Korea to missile defense, you, Mr. President, are dropping the ball like some freshman hoop star recruited with great expectation but who is choking at all the big moments. It is time you realize a great speech does not solve the problem.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>And, Mr. President, you have filled only 50 percent of the vacant positions in your administration. And you let your head of White House personnel appoint himself ambassador to Canada while your deputy personnel head appointed himself to the same post in South Africa. And so the appointment process falls even farther behind. By the time you have all the appointments in place, you will be officially running for re-election.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>When I endorsed you, Mr. President, I expected you to pick the right people for the right positions. You mostly have not.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>You have marginalized the people who would tell you what you need to know, because you evidently prefer to be surrounded by young boobs who tell you what you want to hear.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>From the young and inexperienced know-it-alls in the White House to many of the secretaries you have appointed, they have mostly missed the mark and are in over their heads.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>And, Mr. President  at this point  it appears you are as well.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\">Jacques Laubion<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Obama \u00e0 la moulinette Un texte remarquable de Marc S. Ellenbogen, de UPI, \u00e9galement pr\u00e9sidents de Global Panel Foundation et de la Prague Society, proche des d\u00e9mocrates US et notamment du pr\u00e9sident du parti d\u00e9mocrate Howard S. Dean. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une critique \u00e9poustouflante de brio et de justesse de la premi\u00e8re ann\u00e9e de la pr\u00e9sidence&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[5544,9154,6647,9110,6208],"class_list":["post-71443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-critiques","tag-ellenbogen","tag-jacques","tag-laubion","tag-obama"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71443\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}