Bien plus important que le discours sur l’\u00e9tat de l’Union de BHO, le d\u00e9saccord apparu quelques heures avant ce discours entre Nancy Pelosi, Speaker<\/em> de la Chambre, et Barack Obama. La Speaker<\/em> voulait que les d\u00e9penses de d\u00e9fense soient incluses dans le gel de $250 milliards du prochain budget d’Obama. La Maison-Blanche a r\u00e9pondu par une fin de non-recevoir.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tPelosi exprimait le sentiment de nombreux d\u00e9mocrates de gauche et populistes \u00e0 la Chambre, dans le m\u00eame esprit qu’exprime Steve Clemons (voir notre Bloc-Notes<\/em> de ce 28 janvier 2010<\/a>). Deux textes de Fox.News<\/em> sont \u00e0 consulter pour cela, l’un<\/a> et l’autre<\/a> du 27 janvier 2010. (Nous reviendrons sur ce sujet d’une fa\u00e7on plus substantielle.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abTop Obama Adviser David Axelrod told Fox this afternoon the president opposes Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s call to include the defense budget in a three-year spending freeze. What we can’t do at time when we’re in two wars, and we have a very determined enemy in Al Qaeda, we can’t stand down, Axelrod said. We have to make sure we have adequate defense. I’m not going to get into a debate with the speaker. But the freeze that we’re recommending is for discretionary spending.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbPelosi called for the president’s proposed freeze to apply to defense spending in an interview with reporters Wednesday. The disagreement, surfacing mere hours before the State of the Union address, threatens to cast a pall over one of the items the White House hoped would establish Obama’s credibility on the deficit. Pelosi spoke for many liberal Democrats who did not want domestic spending subject to a three-year freeze if defense spending was exempted.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAxelrod’s assertion that subjecting defense spending to a freeze would mean a stand down against Al Qaeda could fuel Republican criticism of Pelosi and deepen the simmering sense of alienation between House Democrats and the White House.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHouse Democrats complained bitterly this week that after following Obama’s lead on energy, health care, banking and jobs legislation those initiatives have stalled in the Democratically controlled Senate.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" D\u00e9saccord BHO-Pelosi sur les d\u00e9penses de d\u00e9fense Bien plus important que le discours sur l’\u00e9tat de l’Union de BHO, le d\u00e9saccord apparu quelques heures avant ce discours entre Nancy Pelosi, Speaker de la Chambre, et Barack Obama. La Speaker voulait que les d\u00e9penses de d\u00e9fense soient incluses dans le gel de $250 milliards du prochain… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[2631,3019,3413,5750,9213,6208,6140],"class_list":["post-71496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-de","tag-defense","tag-depenses","tag-desaccord","tag-gel","tag-obama","tag-pelosi"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71496"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71496\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}