d\u00e9pass\u00e9e<\/a> parce que les deux facteurs consid\u00e9r\u00e9s sont eux-m\u00eames d\u00e9pass\u00e9s: les int\u00e9r\u00eats et la vision g\u00e9opolitiques prioritaires sur le reste, ce qui n’est plus le cas; la vision id\u00e9ologique de classe appliqu\u00e9e \u00e0 l’\u00e9chelle des relations internationales, ce qui n’est doublement plus le cas (ni la vision id\u00e9ologique, ni son application aux relations internationales). Nous sommes dans une \u00e9poque o\u00f9 l’essentiel n’est plus les \u00e9v\u00e9nements qui surviennent, qui sont pourtant si nombreux et d\u00e9stabilisants, mais l’interpr\u00e9tation m\u00e9thodologique qu’il faut en faire et que ces \u00e9v\u00e9nements eux-m\u00eames nous permettent d’en faire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe escalating tensions are an expression of deep-going changes in geopolitics. The US as a declining but still dominant power faces growing economic and strategic challenges from rising China in every corner of the globe as Beijing seeks secure access to resources and markets. The US is aggressively attempting to consolidate its neo-colonial occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq in an effort to secure a hegemonic position in the key energy rich-regions of the Middle East and Central Asia. China is trying to consolidate its own alliances to keep the US out of what it regards as its Central Asian backyard and to guarantee vital oil and gas supplies.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAfter assuming office a year ago in the midst of the global financial crisis, Obama sought China’s assistance. Faced with huge deficits, Obama officials appealed to Beijing to keep purchasing US bonds and brought Beijing into discussions of the crisis through the G20 grouping. Some optimists even speculated about the formation of a G2the US and Chinathat would resolve the world’s economic and problems in the spirit of cooperation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe confrontational approach now adopted by the US, and China’s determined response, underscore the intractable economic, political and social contradictions facing the capitalist class in both countries. With double-digit unemployment at home and the necessity of making huge budget cutbacks, Obama is aggressively playing the China card to advantage the American economy at China’s expense and politically to divert attention from its own responsibility for the deepening social crisis in the United States.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAs for China, despite its booming growth rate, Beijing confronts rising unemployment and mounting social unrest, which will be further compounded if its key export industries are hit by protectionist measures. The regime’s huge stimulus measures have led to an orgy of speculation in shares and real estate, raising fears of a financial collapse. Like Obama, Chinese leaders are playing the chauvinist card, declaring that they will defend China’s interests, in order to obscure their role in creating one of the most socially unequal societies in the world.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe very real danger is that Taiwan, Tibet or another issue can become the flashpoint for a rapid breakdown of relations and the eruption of trade war and ultimately military conflictas occurred during the last great crisis of world capitalism in the 1930s.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Les dangers d’une confrontation USA-Chine Ce texte du site WSWS.org, du 5 f\u00e9vrier 2010, de John Chan, sur les possibilit\u00e9s de confrontation entre la Chine et les USA, est une excellente synth\u00e8se de la question. Les derniers \u00e9v\u00e9nements y sont mis en \u00e9vidence comme ils doivent \u00eatre, les initiatives agressives des USA (vente d’armes \u00e0… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3977,6340,8516,5875,2804,3952],"class_list":["post-71533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-chine","tag-conflit","tag-geopolitique","tag-ideologie","tag-usa","tag-wsws"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71533\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}