{"id":71545,"date":"2010-02-09T17:14:16","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T17:14:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/02\/09\/alors-rafale-ou-pas-pour-le-bresil\/"},"modified":"2010-02-09T17:14:16","modified_gmt":"2010-02-09T17:14:16","slug":"alors-rafale-ou-pas-pour-le-bresil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/02\/09\/alors-rafale-ou-pas-pour-le-bresil\/","title":{"rendered":"Alors, <em>Rafale<\/em> ou pas pour le Br\u00e9sil ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Alors, <em>Rafale<\/em> ou pas pour le Br\u00e9sil ?<\/h4>\n<p>Il y a eu beaucoup de choses \u00e9crites ces derniers jours autour d&rsquo;un article d&rsquo;un journal br\u00e9silien concernant le choix de l&rsquo;avion de combat br\u00e9silien, et la d\u00e9cision des Fran\u00e7ais de baisser leurs prix sur le <em>Rafale<\/em>. Finalement, l&rsquo;info publi\u00e9e sur le <em>blog<\/em> d&rsquo;<em>Aviation Week<\/em>, <em>Ares<\/em>, le 4 f\u00e9vrier (voir ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/aw\/blogs\/defense\/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a82c27258-f05e-4746-bb83-e4404d4555b9&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest\" class=\"gen\">lien<\/a>), par Christina Mackenzie, est celle qui va le plus loin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici l&rsquo;essentiel de la nouvelle :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Brazil&rsquo;s government has decided to buy 36 Rafale combat aircraft from French manufacturer Dassault for $6.2bn, two billion dollars down from the original price, according to the daily Folha de S.Paulo, which quotes an anonymous source close to the Brazilian government who says the decision was taken by President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Defense Minister Nelson Jobim.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The total deal is worth $10.2bn &#8211; $6.2bn for the aircraft themselves, and $4bn for maintenance over the next 30 years, the daily said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tApr\u00e8s avoir cit\u00e9 Dassault qui n&rsquo;a surtout rien \u00e0 dire, Mackenzie termine en annon\u00e7ant que la d\u00e9cision sera annonc\u00e9e avant fin f\u00e9vrier :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>However, insiders say the (definitive?) answer is expected before the end of the month.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>Chandernagor<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Alors, Rafale ou pas pour le Br\u00e9sil ? Il y a eu beaucoup de choses \u00e9crites ces derniers jours autour d&rsquo;un article d&rsquo;un journal br\u00e9silien concernant le choix de l&rsquo;avion de combat br\u00e9silien, et la d\u00e9cision des Fran\u00e7ais de baisser leurs prix sur le Rafale. Finalement, l&rsquo;info publi\u00e9e sur le blog d&rsquo;Aviation Week, Ares, le&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3677,9172,9257,3219],"class_list":["post-71545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-bresil","tag-chandernagor","tag-mackenzie","tag-rafale"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71545","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71545"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71545\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}