22 f\u00e9vrier 2010<\/a>, \u00e9voque cette possibilit\u00e9, en passant, sans s’attarder sur le sujet, mais en impliquant qu’une candidature serait tout \u00e0 fait concevable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\nIl y a un point \u00e0 mettre en \u00e9vidence ici. En 2012, lors de l’\u00e9lection, Ron Paul, n\u00e9 le 20 août 1935, aura 77 ans. C’est un \u00e2ge absolument exceptionnel, le plus vieux pr\u00e9sident \u00e9lu aux USA \u00e9tant Ronald Reagan qui n’avait pas encore 70 ans lorsqu’il fut inaugur\u00e9 en janvier 1981 (le plus vieux candidat \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 John McCain en 2008, avec 72 ans). Cette situation remarquable ne semble pourtant pas soulever d’interrogation quelconque (cela serait sans doute diff\u00e9rent si Paul \u00e9tait vraiment candidat). L’hypoth\u00e8se qu’on peut avancer \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard est que, dans la situation pr\u00e9sente, l’absence de personnalit\u00e9 sortant du conformisme du syst\u00e8me (sauf Paul, justement) et l’urgence de la crise g\u00e9n\u00e9rale rendent beaucoup plus accessoires ces questions personnelles pour ne s’attacher qu’\u00e0 ce que repr\u00e9sentent les personnes impliqu\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
«Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) said Monday that his win in the Conservative Political Action Conference’s straw poll was \u00ab\u00a0significant\u00a0\u00bb but that he is still undecided on another run for president.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n»Asked about the results Monday on CNBC’s \u00ab\u00a0Squawk Box,\u00a0\u00bb Paul said, \u00ab\u00a0it is significant, and it does get me excited.\u00a0\u00bb Paul said he was \u00ab\u00a0a bit surprised\u00a0\u00bb by his straw poll win but said it is \u00ab\u00a0a good indication that maybe the sentiments are changing.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n»The 2008 insurgent GOP presidential candidate attributed his victory to his younger supporters for backing his fiscal and foreign policy views and for showing up to vote in the straw poll. \u00ab\u00a0The young people are very interested in this. They turned out,\u00a0\u00bb Paul said. \u00ab\u00a0They generally turn out at CPAC meetings, but I think there’s definitely been a shift in attitude.\u00a0\u00bb \u00ab\u00a0It’s not the conventional wisdom of the old Republican Party conservatism,\u00a0\u00bb he said of the sentiment among his supporters. \u00ab\u00a0I think something new is coming along.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n»Paul said that he is \u00ab\u00a0undecided\u00a0\u00bb on another run for president in 2012, but warned GOP leaders to pay more attention to those in the party who share his views. \u00ab\u00a0The Republican Party and other leaders in this country need to wake up and find out exactly why the young people are sick and tired of what is being dumped on them politically and economically,\u00a0\u00bb he said.<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\ndedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"L’\u00e2ge de Paul Avec le grand nombre d’articles concernant la prestation de Ron Paul \u00e0 la convention de la CPAC \u00e0 Washington les 20 et 21 f\u00e9vrier 2010, un facteur est rest\u00e9 dans l’ombre ou a \u00e9t\u00e9 tr\u00e8s peu \u00e9voqu\u00e9, celui d’une candidature effective de Ron Paul en 2012, – alors que le sondage le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9348,5917,2915,3086,3140,3340,3215,3310],"class_list":["post-71625","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-9348","tag-age","tag-ans","tag-dedefensa","tag-paul","tag-presidentielles","tag-reagan","tag-ron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71625","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71625"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71625\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71625"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71625"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71625"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}