Le pr\u00e9sident br\u00e9silien Lula est une des voix les plus fermes dans le sens de la sagesse, lorsqu’il s’agit de la crise iranienne, dont on sait qu’on voudrait l’agr\u00e9menter de nouvelles sanctions anti-iraniennes, jusqu’\u00e0 \u00e9voquer des id\u00e9es de blocus. Lula est contre, r\u00e9solument contre, apr\u00e8s l’avoir proprement signifi\u00e9 \u00e0 Hillary Clinton. Il s’en explique dans une interview \u00e0 AP, dont PressTV.Ir<\/em> donne, le 10 mars 2010<\/a>, quelques d\u00e9tails.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tPuisque la France pr\u00e9tend avoir des relations strat\u00e9giques avec le Br\u00e9sil, peut-\u00eatre son s\u00e9millant pr\u00e9sident pourrait-il avoir une bonne discussion avec son ami Lula sur le sujet? Puis, ensuite, il lui parlerait du Rafale<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abBrazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has warned that imposing new sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program would be a very dangerous step. Sanctions could isolate Iran so much that tensions would spiral out of control, Lula told AP in an interview on Tuesday. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHe suggested that new Iran sanctions might even lead to war. We don’t want to repeat in Iran what happened in Iraq, Lula said, a week after rebuffing US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s appeal for Brazilian support for a new round of tough sanctions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbLula said that Brazil will not support the calls for sanctions, but added that during his visit to Tehran in May, he will try to convince President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to restart negotiations to allay concerns about the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" L’Iran et la sagesse de Lula Le pr\u00e9sident br\u00e9silien Lula est une des voix les plus fermes dans le sens de la sagesse, lorsqu’il s’agit de la crise iranienne, dont on sait qu’on voudrait l’agr\u00e9menter de nouvelles sanctions anti-iraniennes, jusqu’\u00e0 \u00e9voquer des id\u00e9es de blocus. Lula est contre, r\u00e9solument contre, apr\u00e8s l’avoir proprement signifi\u00e9 \u00e0… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[2687,2773,3676,5646],"class_list":["post-71651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-france","tag-iran","tag-lula","tag-sanctions"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}