{"id":71704,"date":"2010-03-25T15:48:16","date_gmt":"2010-03-25T15:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/03\/25\/est-ce-le-debut-de-la-fin-pour-la-version-navy-du-f-35\/"},"modified":"2010-03-25T15:48:16","modified_gmt":"2010-03-25T15:48:16","slug":"est-ce-le-debut-de-la-fin-pour-la-version-navy-du-f-35","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/03\/25\/est-ce-le-debut-de-la-fin-pour-la-version-navy-du-f-35\/","title":{"rendered":"Est-ce le d\u00e9but de la fin pour la version Navy du F-35 ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"common-article2\">Est-ce le d\u00e9but de la fin pour la version Navy du F-35 ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t[Information reprise ce 21 mars 2010 sur le site <a href=\"\/www.corlobe.tk\" class=\"gen\">www.corlobe.tk<\/a>. Publi\u00e9 le 21 mars 2010, derni\u00e8re mise \u00e0 jour le 21 mars 2010.]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tA pr\u00e8s une s\u00e9rie continue de mauvaises nouvelles pour le programme Joint Strike Fighter F-35  y compris pour la version porte-avions de l&rsquo;US Navy , certains observateurs commencent \u00e0 sugg\u00e9rer que la Navy abandonne ses projets d&rsquo;acheter plus de 300 appareils de 5\u00e8 g\u00e9n\u00e9ration.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;alternative : continuer \u00e0 acheter des F\/A-18E\/F Super Hornet qui sont apparus sur les ponts d&rsquo;envol des porte-avions il y a un peu plus de 10 ans. \u00ab<em>Je pense que la Navy doit abandonner le F-35C<\/em> [version porte-avions] <em>\u00e0 cause de l&rsquo;inqui\u00e9tude sur son prix, et continuer avec le Super Hornet<\/em>\u00bb, a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 un assistant parlementaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe soutien de l&rsquo;US Navy pour le F-35C a connu un s\u00e9rieux revers \u00e0 la mi-mars, lorsque le secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Ray Mabus a annonc\u00e9 que la Navy \u00e9tait pr\u00eate \u00e0 acheter plus de Super Hornet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAu d\u00e9part, la Navy avait pr\u00e9vu d&rsquo;arr\u00eater d&rsquo;acheter des Super Hornet en 2013 avec l&rsquo;intention de les remplacer par des JSF \u00e0 partir de 2014.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;analyse de la r\u00e9daction : Parmi les mauvaises nouvelles, on a appris r\u00e9cemment que le prix du F-35 avait grimp\u00e9 \u00e0 135 millions $ (contre seulement 90 pour le F-18). Autre avantage de ce dernier : il est parfaitement connu, alors qu&rsquo;aucune des capacit\u00e9s du F-35 n&rsquo;a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 test\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tR\u00e9f\u00e9rence : <em>Navy Times<\/em> (Etats-Unis).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>Morbihan<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Est-ce le d\u00e9but de la fin pour la version Navy du F-35 ? [Information reprise ce 21 mars 2010 sur le site www.corlobe.tk. Publi\u00e9 le 21 mars 2010, derni\u00e8re mise \u00e0 jour le 21 mars 2010.] A pr\u00e8s une s\u00e9rie continue de mauvaises nouvelles pour le programme Joint Strike Fighter F-35 y compris pour la&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[7525,4711,250,9170,3487],"class_list":["post-71704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-f-35c","tag-hornet","tag-jsf","tag-morbihan","tag-super"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}