{"id":71782,"date":"2010-04-16T08:43:22","date_gmt":"2010-04-16T08:43:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/04\/16\/si-lon-votait-aujourdhui-42-pour-bho-41-pour-ron-paul\/"},"modified":"2010-04-16T08:43:22","modified_gmt":"2010-04-16T08:43:22","slug":"si-lon-votait-aujourdhui-42-pour-bho-41-pour-ron-paul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/04\/16\/si-lon-votait-aujourdhui-42-pour-bho-41-pour-ron-paul\/","title":{"rendered":"Si l’on votait aujourd’hui : 42% pour BHO, 41% pour Ron Paul\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Si l’on votait aujourd’hui : 42% pour BHO, 41% pour Ron Paul<\/h4>\n

Qu’on se rassure, la presse officielle, couleur-Pravda<\/em>, n’en fait ni ses choux gras ni ses manchettes. Il n’emp\u00eache que le sondage Rasmussen du 14 avril 2010<\/a>, sur l’hypoth\u00e8se de l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle, donne ce r\u00e9sultat stup\u00e9fiant: 42% pour Obama, 41% pour Ron Paul.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEt qu’on se rassure pour autant (suite) Lorsque la question est pos\u00e9e indirectement \u00e0 la classe politique par rapport au vulgum pecus<\/em> par la voie d’une question sur la pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence pour le vainqueur de 2012, le r\u00e9sultat est bien diff\u00e9rent. 58% des personnes faisant partie du vulgum pecus<\/em> pr\u00e9f\u00e8rent une victoire de Paul, tandis que 95% de la classe politique, c’est-\u00e0-dire les gens s\u00e9rieux qui nous donnent tant de satisfaction dans la direction des affaires, sont en faveur d’Obama. Un beau clich\u00e9 de la diff\u00e9rence entre le soi-disant pays l\u00e9gal et le pays r\u00e9el.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQu’importe M\u00eame s’il n’a pas b\u00e9n\u00e9fici\u00e9 d’une immense publicit\u00e9, ce sondage est du genre \u00e0 susciter bien des paniques discr\u00e8tes dans les milieux washingtoniens. Cela, en pleine \u00e9lectorale, car, pour l’instant, c’est la situation de 2010 qui nous int\u00e9resse. Et cette situation n’en est pas moins int\u00e9ressante, avec les autres r\u00e9sultats du sondage, qui vaudra certainement plus de commentaires. On y trouve des \u00e9clatements divers hors des lignes habituelles des deux ailes du parti unique, une forte pr\u00e9sence de Tea Party<\/em> (24% des personnes interrog\u00e9es estiment en faire partie) et ainsi de suite. Une situation pour le moins instable et en plein bouleversement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abPit maverick Republican Congressman Ron Paul against President Obama in a hypothetical 2012 election match-up, and the race is virtually dead even.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbA new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of likely voters finds Obama with 42% support and Paul with 41% of the vote. Eleven percent (11%) prefer some other candidate, and six percent (6%) are undecided. Ask the Political Class, though, and it’s a blowout. While 58% of Mainstream voters favor Paul, 95% of the Political Class vote for Obama.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut Republican voters also have decidedly mixed feelings about Paul, who has been an outspoken critic of the party establishment. Obama earns 79% support from Democrats, but Paul gets just 66% of GOP votes. Voters not affiliated with either major party give Paul a 47% to 28% edge over the president.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbPaul, an anti-big government libertarian who engenders unusually strong feelings among his supporters, was an unsuccessful candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008. But he continues to have a solid following, especially in the growing Tea Party movement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbTwenty-four percent (24%) of voters now consider themselves a part of the Tea Party movement, an eight-point increase from a month ago. Another 10% say they are not a part of the movement but have close friends or family members who are.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(A lire \u00e9galement, le commentaire \u00e9videmment jubilant de Justin Raimondo, ce 16 avril 2010<\/a>, sur Antiwar.com<\/em>. C’est lui qui a attir\u00e9 notre attention sur le sondage Rasmusen.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Si l’on votait aujourd’hui : 42% pour BHO, 41% pour Ron Paul Qu’on se rassure, la presse officielle, couleur-Pravda, n’en fait ni ses choux gras ni ses manchettes. Il n’emp\u00eache que le sondage Rasmussen du 14 avril 2010, sur l’hypoth\u00e8se de l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle, donne ce r\u00e9sultat stup\u00e9fiant: 42% pour Obama, 41% pour Ron Paul. Et… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[6208,7069,3140,4337,7650,3310,5190,8256],"class_list":["post-71782","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-obama","tag-party","tag-paul","tag-raimondo","tag-rasmussen","tag-ron","tag-sondage","tag-tea"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71782","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71782"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71782\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}