{"id":71789,"date":"2010-04-19T07:10:44","date_gmt":"2010-04-19T07:10:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/04\/19\/tea-party-fait-trembler-la-bourse\/"},"modified":"2010-04-19T07:10:44","modified_gmt":"2010-04-19T07:10:44","slug":"tea-party-fait-trembler-la-bourse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/04\/19\/tea-party-fait-trembler-la-bourse\/","title":{"rendered":"Tea Party<\/em> fait trembler la bourse"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tea Party<\/em> fait trembler la bourse<\/h4>\n

Greg Moses, \u00e9diteur de Texas Civil Rights Review<\/em> et auteur de Revolution of Conscience: Martin Luther King, Jr.<\/em> et de Philosophy of Nonviolence<\/em>, fait une analyse tr\u00e8s critique de la philosophie du mouvement Tea Party<\/em>, dans The Dissident Voice<\/em> du 17 avril 2010<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl consid\u00e8re Tea Party<\/em> comme un mouvement attaquant le gouvernement n\u00e9 du New Deal<\/em> de Roosevelt, donc contre la justice sociale, au profit du pouvoir des grands conglom\u00e9rats industriels. (\u00abGrapes of Wrath is how Steinbeck titled the social mood of depression. But wrath at what? For the Tea Party movement, wrath is being organized to attack the kind of federal government that the last Great Depression produced in the USA. The Tea Party movement is a pre-emptive attack on the social contract of the New Deal, demanding in advance of these hard times coming that we prepare to roll back our federal networks the better to make way for new heights of corporate power.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est donc classer Tea Party<\/em> comme un instrument au service du pouvoir capitaliste, des march\u00e9s, de la puissance financi\u00e8re et sp\u00e9culatrice et ainsi de suite. Pourtant, Greg Moses commence son texte par signaler que les bourses du monde entier ont enregistr\u00e9 une baisse significative le 16 avril, apr\u00e8s le jour de protestation nationale de Tea Party<\/em> contre le syst\u00e8me des imp\u00f4ts f\u00e9d\u00e9raux. Un esprit simple se demanderait pour quelles raisons les bourses accueillent avec une tendance baissi\u00e8re, comme disent les sp\u00e9cialistes des march\u00e9s, la nouvelle des manifestations nationales de Tea Party<\/em>, alors que Tea Party<\/em> repr\u00e9sente une pouss\u00e9e hostile, selon Moses, \u00e0 un gouvernement qui pr\u00e9senterait toutes les vertus de l’aide sociale contre le free market capitalism<\/em>, dont Tea Party<\/em> serait un ardent d\u00e9fenseur.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abLike so many chests of tea tossed overboard into Boston Harbor, world markets fell straight down Friday in the aftermath of Thursday’s Tea Party protests.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWhether they were Asian markets in Tokyo, Hong Kong, Sydney, or Bombay (yes, even Bombay). Whether they were European markets in London, Paris, or Frankfurt. Or whether they were US markets such as the Dow, the Nasdaq, the S&P, Gold, or Oil (yes, even Gold and Oil) markets around the world tumbled down on April 16.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThis totalizing tumble had nearly completed the global circuit by the time news hit (at 10:35 am EDT) that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was alleging fraud against the powerhouse investment banking firm Goldman Sachs.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbA Prescience Award for this sudden turn down goes to Steve Hochberg, chief market analyst for Elliott Wave International who told CNBC’s Joe Kernan on the morning of April 15 that extreme opinions were showing signs of a collective psychological turning point upon which social moodand its market expressionwas soon to slide lower<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl s’agit d’une d\u00e9monstration de plus de la difficult\u00e9 d’appr\u00e9hender le mouvement Tea Party<\/em> avec des appr\u00e9ciations id\u00e9ologiques. Cela conduit \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter un mouvement objectivement d\u00e9structurant pour le syst\u00e8me, comme le montre la r\u00e9action des march\u00e9s, en un mouvement alli\u00e9 \u00e0 ce qu’il y a de pire dans le syst\u00e8me, sinon manipul\u00e9 pour lui. L’essentiel pour Moses est bien entendu de faire appara\u00eetre l’administration Obama comme \u00e9tant dans la lign\u00e9e vertueuse de l’administration Roosevelt.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tea Party fait trembler la bourse Greg Moses, \u00e9diteur de Texas Civil Rights Review et auteur de Revolution of Conscience: Martin Luther King, Jr. et de Philosophy of Nonviolence, fait une analyse tr\u00e8s critique de la philosophie du mouvement Tea Party, dans The Dissident Voice du 17 avril 2010. Il consid\u00e8re Tea Party comme un… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[5200,4363,9481,7069,3080,3372,8256,3132],"class_list":["post-71789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-bourse","tag-capitalisme","tag-moses","tag-party","tag-roosevelt","tag-street","tag-tea","tag-wall"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71789"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71789\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}