{"id":71790,"date":"2010-04-19T09:12:19","date_gmt":"2010-04-19T09:12:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/04\/19\/mullen-sen-va-pas-t-en-guerre\/"},"modified":"2010-04-19T09:12:19","modified_gmt":"2010-04-19T09:12:19","slug":"mullen-sen-va-pas-t-en-guerre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/04\/19\/mullen-sen-va-pas-t-en-guerre\/","title":{"rendered":"Mullen s’en va-pas-t-en-guerre"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mullen s’en va-pas-t-en-guerre<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Sur fond d’un \u00ab\u00a0m\u00e9mo\u00a0\u00bb de Robert Gates ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 divulgu\u00e9 \u00e0 la presse et annon\u00e7ant que les USA n’ont pas de plan cr\u00e9dible pour attaquer l’Iran, ce qui est interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 de deux fa\u00e7ons (\u00ab\u00a0il en faut un\u00a0\u00bb ou bien \u00ab\u00a0nous n’avons pas les moyens d’en avoir un\u00a0\u00bb), il y a ces d\u00e9clarations de l’amiral Mullen, pr\u00e9sident du Joint Chief of Staff, au cours d’une conf\u00e9rence \u00e0 Columbia University. Les interpr\u00e9tations diverses sont saisissantes. On en choisira deux.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Celle du Times<\/em> de Londres, ce 19 avril 2010<\/a>, sous le titre : «Pentagon chief raises threat of attack as Iran taunts US with missile display<\/em>». Le texte annonce l’impatience du Pentagone de lancer une attaque contre l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

«The Pentagon was ratcheting up pressure for military action against Iran last night as America’s top uniformed official said for the first time that a strike on nuclear targets would \u00ab\u00a0go a long way\u00a0\u00bb towards delaying Tehran’s uranium enrichment programme.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»The remarks by Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were his strongest yet in support of a strategy that both the Pentagon and the Obama Administration still regard as a last resort and possibly a recipe for a regional war.<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»The war of words in Washington may reflect a power struggle between an Administration still committed to a diplomatic approach to Iran and an increasingly impatient Pentagon.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»Speaking at Columbia University, Admiral Mullen said last night of the Iranian nuclear programme: \u00ab\u00a0Military options would go a long way to delaying it. That’s not my call. That’s going to be the President’s call. But from my perspective . . . the last option is to strike right now.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em> […]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»Such rhetoric reflects the worrying reality for Washington that Iran is more concerned about military encirclement by the US than by President Obama’s efforts to persuade it to end its pursuit of nuclear weapons.<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Et puis l’interpr\u00e9tation du site Danger Room<\/em>, de Noah Shachtmann, pas particuli\u00e8rement anti-guerre et certainement tout aussi s\u00e9rieux, sinon plus, que les appoint\u00e9s de la presse Murdoch, le 18 avril 2010<\/a>. Le titre est : «Joint Chiefs Chair: No, No, No. Don’t Attack Iran.<\/em>» Le texte est \u00e0 mesure, \u00e0 comparer avec le pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

«We are all screwed if Iran gets a nuke. And we may be just as screwed if the United States attacks Iran to keep Tehran from getting that nuke.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»Okay, I’m paraphrasing a bit. But that’s the core of the message from America’s top military officer, who reiterated today his canyon-deep reservations about any military solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis. Sure, U.S. strikes might set back Tehran’s atomic weapons program — for a while. But the \u00ab\u00a0unintended consequences\u00a0\u00bb of a hit on Iran’s nuclear facilities could easily outweigh the benefits of that delay, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen told a forum at Columbia University.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»\u00ab\u00a0Iran getting a nuclear weapon would be incredibly destabilizing. Attacking them would also create the same kind of outcome,\u00a0\u00bb Mullen said. \u00ab\u00a0In an area that’s so unstable right now, we just don’t need more of that.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

L’information? Faites votre choix…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mullen s’en va-pas-t-en-guerre Sur fond d’un \u00ab\u00a0m\u00e9mo\u00a0\u00bb de Robert Gates ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 divulgu\u00e9 \u00e0 la presse et annon\u00e7ant que les USA n’ont pas de plan cr\u00e9dible pour attaquer l’Iran, ce qui est interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 de deux fa\u00e7ons (\u00ab\u00a0il en faut un\u00a0\u00bb ou bien \u00ab\u00a0nous n’avons pas les moyens d’en avoir un\u00a0\u00bb), il y a ces d\u00e9clarations… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[2870,4718,3100,2773,7098,8590,2852],"class_list":["post-71790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-attaque","tag-danger","tag-information","tag-iran","tag-mullen","tag-room","tag-times"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71790"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71790\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}