La guerre m\u00e9diatique, la guerre du syst\u00e8me de la communication, on devrait dire, puisque nous sommes aux USA, la Guerre Civile du syst\u00e8me de la communication, cette guerre-l\u00e0 fait rage. L’affaire de l’Arizona<\/a> l’alimente diablement. Le commentaire r\u00e9gulier de Jeffrey T. Kuhner<\/a>, dans le Washington Times<\/em>, dans sa chronique \u00e0 la date du 30 avril 2010<\/a>, ne d\u00e9pare pas le tableau. Il accuse BHO de pr\u00e9parer une seconde Guerre Civile, et une guerre raciale: \u00abMr. Obama is fueling greater ideological, political and racial polarization. Not since the Civil War have Americans been so divided. He is laying the groundwork for a possible race war.<\/em>\u00bb Il accuse Obama de s’inspirer de Martin Heidegger, qu’il qualifie de fervent nazi et de la Jane Fonda de sa p\u00e9riode vietnamienne, pro-Hano\u00ef. Charmant m\u00e9lange de l’extr\u00eame droite et de l’extr\u00eame gauche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tKuhner pr\u00e9sente BHO comme d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9 de regrouper autour de lui un \u00e9lectorat pour \u00e9viter une d\u00e9faite d\u00e9mocrate en novembre prochain<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abHence, Mr. Obama is resorting to the worst kind of demagoguery: playing the race card. In a video to Democrats, the president embraced identity politics; black, Hispanic and female voters are to be courted at the expense of white middle-class America. It will be up to each of you to make sure that the young people, African-Americans, Latinos and women, who powered our victory in 2008, stand together once again, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr. Obama conveniently ignored the large chunk of white voters – suburbanites, latte-sipping professionals, environmentalists, labor union members who voted for him in huge numbers. For Mr. Obama in the 2010 election, whites no longer matter especially white Christian males.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIn recent memory, no president has so deliberately and publicly sought to pit racial and gender groups against each other<\/em> [] Mr. Obama is fracturing America. He is calling on the primacy of race and gender in order to perpetuate his national socialist revolution. He is championing a revanchist tribalism – the politics of grievance and racial victimology that undermines our common national identity.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb[Obama]and his Democratic allies have deliberately fanned the flames of racial tensions over Arizona’s immigration law.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe state statute does nothing more than empower local police to enforce existing federal immigration laws. Overrun by Mexican drug cartels, a soaring crime wave and many illegal migrants, Arizona’s authorities are taking action to protect the border in the wake of federal government inaction. The state’s comprehensive immigration enforcement law is simply patriotic common sense and self-defense.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr. Obama, however, has blasted it as misguided. The liberal media is comparing the law to Hitlerism, a form of apartheid and white supremacy, supposedly for its racial profiling of Hispanics. The Rev. Al Sharpton is leading an economic boycott of the state. The attack on Arizona’s immigration law is an attempt to frighten Hispanics into believing that white Arizonans are seeking to impose a racial caste system. It is deliberately playing the races against one another to help Mr. Obama get higher voter turnout among minorities in November.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe consequences are the gradual Balkanization and breakup of America. The mainstream media refuses to report on one overriding reality: Racial violence has broken out in protest of Arizona’s law. Gangs of Hispanic protesters in Arizona have been throwing rocks and bottles at police, spitting at them and denouncing them as pigs. Massive rallies are planned across the country this weekend to demand amnesty for illegal aliens. Event leaders will use Arizona’s law as a rallying point to channel ethnic anger and rage.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n Kuhner n’est pas un extr\u00e9miste absolu, un de ces extr\u00e9mistes ayant \u00e9pous\u00e9 les conceptions radicales des groupes religieux r\u00e9form\u00e9s les plus extr\u00eames comme il en pullule aux USA. Conservateur certes, Canadien d’origine, catholique, il est notamment identifi\u00e9<\/a> par le Wikip\u00e9dia<\/em> comme le pr\u00e9sident du \u00abEdmund Burke Institute for American Renewal, a Washington D.C. think tank devoted to integrating minorities into the conservative movement<\/em>\u00bb. Cette caract\u00e9ristique ne fait pas de lui un raciste furieux, oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 tous les groupes non-Blancs des USA. La fureur terrible de son commentaire n’en est que plus r\u00e9v\u00e9latrice des tensions extraordinaires d’intensit\u00e9 qui se manifestent d\u00e9sormais de fa\u00e7on r\u00e9guli\u00e8re aux USA, dans le cours de cette campagne \u00e9lectorale \u00e9maill\u00e9e d’\u00e9v\u00e9nements institutionnels particuli\u00e8rement graves et caract\u00e9ristiques. L’affaire d’Arizona en est un et, pour l’instant, un cas en pointe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\nNotre commentaire<\/h4>\n