23 avril 2010<\/a>, avec la participation de Bill Sweetman, pour observer qu’ainsi la controverse du JSF atteignait de plus en plus le grand public. Il para\u00eet \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue acceptable d’observer que cette participation de Sweetman \u00e0 cette \u00e9mission est la cause principale, ou encore la goutte d’eau qui fait d\u00e9border le vase, de la d\u00e9cision de sa mise \u00e0 pied temporaire (?) de tout commentaire sur le JSF. Cette d\u00e9cision constitue une mesure de censure d’un type qui n’a pas de pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent dans la presse. On n’arr\u00eate donc pas le progr\u00e8s, ni l’innovation cr\u00e9atrice.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tBien entendu, nous reviendrons en d\u00e9tails et en commentaires sur la nouvelle. La chose a au moins l’avantage de nous d\u00e9montrer, si besoin en \u00e9tait, de l’excellent \u00e9tat de la catastrophe JSF.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bill Sweetman interdit de JSF Le site Danger Room annonce ce 10 mai 2010 que Aviation Week & Space Technology, du groupe McGraw-Hill, a demand\u00e9, ou bien intim\u00e9 l’ordre on ne sait, au journaliste Bill Sweetman de s’abstenir d\u00e9sormais, et pour un temps ind\u00e9termin\u00e9, de commenter sur son site de commentaire Ares les progr\u00e8s persistants… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4195,6041,2826,6597,4718,8590,6769,4247],"class_list":["post-71860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-aviation","tag-bill","tag-censure","tag-commentaire","tag-danger","tag-room","tag-sweetman","tag-week"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71860\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}