{"id":71984,"date":"2010-06-21T05:19:02","date_gmt":"2010-06-21T05:19:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/06\/21\/la-crise-fleurit-voici-le-complot-bho-bp\/"},"modified":"2010-06-21T05:19:02","modified_gmt":"2010-06-21T05:19:02","slug":"la-crise-fleurit-voici-le-complot-bho-bp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/06\/21\/la-crise-fleurit-voici-le-complot-bho-bp\/","title":{"rendered":"La crise fleurit : voici le complot BHO-BP"},"content":{"rendered":"

La crise fleurit : voici le complot BHO-BP<\/h4>\n

Jusqu’ici, il y avait eu des rumeurs. Maintenant, nous y sommes. Une d\u00e9claration s\u00e9rieuse, officielle, d’un candidat \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation r\u00e9publicaine pour la Chambre en Caroline du Nord, Bill Randall, Africain-Am\u00e9ricain ce qui ne g\u00e2che rien, qui dit sa conviction que l’oil spill<\/em> du Golfe a \u00e9t\u00e9 provoqu\u00e9 et qu’il est le r\u00e9sultat d’une collusion (un complot, si vous voulez) entre BHO et BP. Randall n’a aucune preuve et se garde bien de dire qu’il en a une mais il pour lui la fermet\u00e9 de son langage et d’une conviction \u00e9galement \u00e9lectorale. Son explication est une commune volont\u00e9 BHO\/BP de discr\u00e9diter le forage maritime \u00e0 grande profondeur et de donner un \u00e9lan d\u00e9cisif \u00e0 un grand ensemble l\u00e9gislatif de conversion des USA \u00e0 l’emploi des \u00e9nergies non-fossiles.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tTout cela, dans RAW Story<\/em>, le 18 juin 2010<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBill Randall, a North Carolina Republican candidate for Congress, is calling for a thorough investigation into whether President Barack Obama’s administration colluded with BP to allow the Gulf oil spill. There were procedures that were violated by BP that the federal government signed off on, safeguards that decades of engineering wherewithal and knowledge told them that this way the way to do it, Randall told reporters earlier this week. They intentionally bypassed that and the safety was compromised.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbRandall continued: I’m not necessarily a conspiracy person, but I don’t think enough investigation has been done on this. Someone needs to be digging into that situation. Personally, and this is purely speculative on my part and not based on any fact, but personally I feel there is a possibility that there was some sort of collusion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThough Randall has insisted he doesn’t know why the Obama administration would want to do this, his claim came in response to a question about whether he supported President Obama’s six-month moratorium on deep-water drilling. That would suggest Randall may be reflecting the views of some conservatives who suspect the oil spill may have been caused on purpose by environmentalists or other people who want to turn public opinion against oil drilling and pass climate-change and green energy legislation.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEnsuite, Randall a l\u00e9g\u00e8rement nuanc\u00e9 ses propos, sans revenir n\u00e9cessairement sur l’essentiel de sa conviction intuitive. \u00abAt a follow-up press conference Thursday, Randall defended his call for an investigation into possible collusion between BP and the federal government but denied that his earlier comments suggested the spill was made to happen or allowed to happen. Asked if he thought the oil spill was intentional, Randall replied, I don’t think you can take anything from my statement that indicates that.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(Voir aussi notre Bloc-Notes<\/em> du 21 juin 2010<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La crise fleurit : voici le complot BHO-BP Jusqu’ici, il y avait eu des rumeurs. Maintenant, nous y sommes. Une d\u00e9claration s\u00e9rieuse, officielle, d’un candidat \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation r\u00e9publicaine pour la Chambre en Caroline du Nord, Bill Randall, Africain-Am\u00e9ricain ce qui ne g\u00e2che rien, qui dit sa conviction que l’oil spill du Golfe a \u00e9t\u00e9… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9703,4926,7911,6888,9702,9640],"class_list":["post-71984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-bho-bp","tag-complot","tag-conviction","tag-oil","tag-randall","tag-spill"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71984\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}