{"id":72015,"date":"2010-06-28T04:58:32","date_gmt":"2010-06-28T04:58:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/06\/28\/obama-et-la-frustration-des-autres\/"},"modified":"2010-06-28T04:58:32","modified_gmt":"2010-06-28T04:58:32","slug":"obama-et-la-frustration-des-autres","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/06\/28\/obama-et-la-frustration-des-autres\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama et la frustration des autres"},"content":{"rendered":"

Obama et la frustration des autres<\/h4>\n

Avec le site le plus puissant de la gauche institutionnelle qui s’affirme r\u00e9formiste, Arianna Huffington repr\u00e9sente une force importante de l’establishment<\/em>, et le soutien naturel originel d’Obama. Son \u00e9volution depuis plus d’un an a \u00e9t\u00e9 de plus en plus critique. Ici, lors de l’\u00e9mission Fareed Zakaria GPS<\/em>, de CNN, elle lance une attaque violente contre le pr\u00e9sident, proclamant que la frustration est g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, au-del\u00e0 des diff\u00e9rences entre le vieux clivage entre la gauche et la droite. Personne ne la contredit parmi les autres intervenants, y compris Zakaria lui-m\u00eame, autre personnage cl\u00e9 de l’establishment<\/em>, tendance mod\u00e9r\u00e9e. On doit voir dans cet \u00e9pisode la confirmation effectivement de l’existence d’un mouvement puissant, transcendant les partis, de m\u00e9contentement profond affectant d\u00e9sormais l’establishment<\/em> washingtonien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tExtraits transcrits de passages de l’\u00e9mission sur Huffington Post<\/em>, le 27 juin 2010<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abArianna appeared as a guest on CNN’s Fareed Zakaria GPS on Sunday, along with Eliot Spitzer, Ross Douthat And Katrina Vanden Heuval. The roundtable discussed the growing frustration with Obama over his handling of the economy and the Gulf oil spill.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbPresident Obama is front and center in the news again this week, Zakaria began. This time it’s for the firing of Stanley McChrystal. Before that he was being criticized for his handling of the oil spill. His approval levels are down, and the nattering nabobs of negativism have been hammering him around the clock. Even some of the most left leaning of the commentary have turned on Barack Obama. So what does all this mean?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSpitzer said that Obama needs to do more to take charge of the oil spill response. He trusts people too much, Spitzer said. He trusted Wall Street. He trusted the Republicans to engage in a meaningful way. He trusted BP. He’s 0 for three.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWhat Eliot said is absolutely critical, Arianna continued. It’s not just trust. I think there is almost like a reverence that the president has for authority. You know, a reverence for establishments. You know, the Wall Street establishment. The military establishment. The BP establishment, you know? Even his own admiral in charge of the BP oil spill a few weeks ago said that I trust that what Tony Hayward is telling me.’ He actually used those words. So that is really very fundamental problem that is affecting his whole presidency.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbLiberals are dismayed. They’re angry. They’re abandoning him, Zakaria said. Arianna replied that This whole framing as a right versus left debate a liberal verse conservative debate is completely flawed. It’s obsolete. It’s making it much harder for us to solve our problems as a country.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWall Street reform is a classic example, she continued, where some of the best conservative minds, and some of the best liberal minds agree that if you don’t have the end of too big to fail, if you don’t have fundamental derivatives reform, everything else is ultimately cosmetic.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn retrouve la m\u00eame frustration g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e dans d’autres d\u00e9clarations d’Arianna Huffington, \u00e0 la m\u00eame \u00e9mission, \u00e9galement dans une transcription du 27 juin 2010<\/a>. Elle y parle en termes extr\u00eamement indulgents et compr\u00e9hensifs de la popularit\u00e9 de Sarah Palin et du mouvement Tea Party<\/em>, estimant que ces divers \u00e9v\u00e9nements sont compl\u00e8tement justifi\u00e9s par la situation et par le gouvernement d’Obama. L\u00e0 aussi, d\u00e9clarations remarquables pour une personnalit\u00e9 de la gauche mod\u00e9r\u00e9e, d’habitude tr\u00e8s s\u00e9v\u00e8re pour cet activisme de droite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abWell, Sarah Palin is responding to something beyond the base, Arianna responded. She is responding to the anger at the bailout. And she’s responding to a sense of unfairness among the American people which goes to independents and which goes to a lot of middle class Americans who are feeling that the game is rigged, that the fix is in, and that therefore, they’re in real trouble. And she’s appealing to that.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIf you really interview a lot of the people in the Tea Party movement, no matter what their first explanation is, their second explanation for their anger is the bailout. And I think Republicans and Democrats have to come to terms with that. Especially now that we’re seeing this anemic Wall Street reform going through, which we all know is not going to prevent the next meltdown.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Obama et la frustration des autres Avec le site le plus puissant de la gauche institutionnelle qui s’affirme r\u00e9formiste, Arianna Huffington repr\u00e9sente une force importante de l’establishment, et le soutien naturel originel d’Obama. Son \u00e9volution depuis plus d’un an a \u00e9t\u00e9 de plus en plus critique. Ici, lors de l’\u00e9mission Fareed Zakaria GPS, de CNN,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[8801,9748,6868,6208,9749,9747],"class_list":["post-72015","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-arianna","tag-frustration","tag-huffington","tag-obama","tag-reverence","tag-zacharias"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72015"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72015\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72015"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72015"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}