{"id":72024,"date":"2010-06-30T05:31:17","date_gmt":"2010-06-30T05:31:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/06\/30\/bill-clinton-le-oil-spill-et-loption-nucleaire\/"},"modified":"2010-06-30T05:31:17","modified_gmt":"2010-06-30T05:31:17","slug":"bill-clinton-le-oil-spill-et-loption-nucleaire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/06\/30\/bill-clinton-le-oil-spill-et-loption-nucleaire\/","title":{"rendered":"Bill Clinton, le oil spill<\/em> et l’option nucl\u00e9aire"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bill Clinton, le oil spill<\/em> et l’option nucl\u00e9aire<\/h4>\n

RAW Story<\/em> (le 29 juin 2010<\/a>) rel\u00e8ve des remarques de Bill Clinton, ce week-end, lors d’une interview t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e en Afrique du Sud. Clinton y parle de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d’une intervention violente pour boucher la fuite de p\u00e9trole du oil spill<\/em>, par explosion. Il discute l’option nucl\u00e9aire (l’emploi d’une petite bombe nucl\u00e9aire) d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9voqu\u00e9e ici et l\u00e0, et s’y montre plut\u00f4t d\u00e9favorable. Pour Clinton, il s’agit de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d’une intervention des forces arm\u00e9es US pour reprendre en main la crise, qui est actuellement sous le contr\u00f4le de BP. On peut envisager que Clinton parle \u00e0 partir de certaines informations pr\u00e9cises, en raison de ses connexions officielles \u00e9videntes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDeux remarques : l’intervention de Bill Clinton peut \u00eatre comprise comme une critique indirecte s\u00e9v\u00e8re du gouvernement Obama, pour laisser l’affaire dans les mains de BP ; elle peut \u00eatre comprise \u00e9galement, et parall\u00e8lement, comme l’affirmation indirecte que le probl\u00e8me du oil spill<\/em> du Golfe du Mexique est loin d’\u00eatre contr\u00f4l\u00e9, encore moins d’\u00eatre r\u00e9solu, qu’il s’agit d’une question qui pourrait redevenir explosive, outre la suggestion sur le fait m\u00eame, d’un point de vue politiquement \u00e9galement. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(Beaucoup de commentaires int\u00e9ressants avec cette nouvelles de RAW Story<\/em>, en plus de la vid\u00e9o de l’interview de Bill Clinton.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abLittle noticed comments from former President Bill Clinton over the weekend which he made in South Africa are perhaps well a bit explosive. Unless we send the Navy down deep to blow up the well and cover the leak with piles and piles and piles of rock and debris, which may become necessary you don’t have to use a nuclear weapon by the way, I’ve seen all that stuff, just blow it up unless we’re going to do that, we are dependent on the technical expertise of these people from BP, Clinton said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbClinton was speaking about British Petroleum’s efforts to staunch a massive leak that erupted after one of the oil rigs it was leasing blew up Apr. 20. His remarks about the explosion solution come at about 2:30 into the recording…<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMatt Simmons, founder of energy investment bank Simmons & Company, suggested earlier this month that the US military could close the drill hole with a nuclear weapon. Probably the only thing we can do is create a weapons system and send it down 18,000 feet and detonate it, hopefully encasing the oil, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHis idea echoes that of a Russian newspaper that earlier this month suggested the US detonate a small nuclear bomb to seal the oil beneath the sea<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbCritics of Clinton’s plan have told Fox that BP is resisting the option because blowing up the well would ensure they could get no more oil.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIf we demolish the well using explosives, the investment’s gone, former submarine officer and nuclear policy scholar at Columbia University Christopher Brownfield told Fox News in May. They lose hundreds of millions of dollars from the drilling of the well, plus no lawmaker in his right mind would allow BP to drill again in that same spot. So basically, it’s an all-or-nothing thing with BP: They either keep the well alive, or they lose their whole investment and all the oil that they could potentially get from that well.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bill Clinton, le oil spill et l’option nucl\u00e9aire RAW Story (le 29 juin 2010) rel\u00e8ve des remarques de Bill Clinton, ce week-end, lors d’une interview t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e en Afrique du Sud. Clinton y parle de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d’une intervention violente pour boucher la fuite de p\u00e9trole du oil spill, par explosion. Il discute l’option nucl\u00e9aire (l’emploi… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[6041,934,3004,6888,6934,9640],"class_list":["post-72024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-bill","tag-clinton","tag-nucleaire","tag-oil","tag-option","tag-spill"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}