{"id":72040,"date":"2010-07-03T11:52:31","date_gmt":"2010-07-03T11:52:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/07\/03\/sweetman-est-de-retour\/"},"modified":"2010-07-03T11:52:31","modified_gmt":"2010-07-03T11:52:31","slug":"sweetman-est-de-retour","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/07\/03\/sweetman-est-de-retour\/","title":{"rendered":"Sweetman est de retour\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_a.deepgreen\" style=\"color:#75714d;font-size:2em;\">Sweetman est de retour&hellip;<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Petite nouvelle dans le petit monde des <em>blogs<\/em>, grande nouvelle pour l&rsquo;information \u00e0 propos du JSF&hellip; Bill Sweetman, \u00ab\u00a0<a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-l_execution_soft_de_bill_sweetman_12_05_2010.html\">interdit<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb de JSF depuis plus d&rsquo;un mois et demi, est de retour pour les commentaires sur le JSF sur son <em>blog<\/em> d&rsquo;<em>Ares<\/em>, le <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/aw\/blogs\/defense\/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a3dce52ee-c1ab-453b-8c34-501ee23a10bd&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest\">1er juillet 2010<\/a>. Bonne nouvelle, dont il est difficile d&rsquo;estimer \u00e0 quoi elle est due. On notera simplement que l&rsquo;\u00e9viction de Sweetman avait fait un grand tort \u00e0 <em>Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology<\/em>, tant au sein de la profession que pour sa r\u00e9putation de professionnalisme et de pr\u00e9tention \u00e0 l&rsquo;information et au commentaire ind\u00e9pendants aupr\u00e8s de ses lecteurs, voire de ses annonceurs par cons\u00e9quent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>L&rsquo;article de Sweetman, &laquo;<em>Price Is Not Cost<\/em>&raquo;, \u00e9crit certes sur un ton mod\u00e9r\u00e9, est une longue analyse, tout de m\u00eame sceptique sinon critique, concernant les affirmations de Lockheed Martin sur sa capacit\u00e9 \u00e0 maintenir les prix du JSF.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Discr\u00e8tement, un des commentaires salue ce retour (il s&rsquo;agit bien de saluer le retour \u00e0 l&rsquo;analyse du programme JSF de Sweetman, \u00ab\u00a0<a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article-bill_sweetman_interdit_de_jsf__11_05_2010.html\">interdit<\/a>\u00a0\u00bb \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard depuis le 10 mai, puisqu&rsquo;entre-temps Sweetman avait publi\u00e9 sur <em>Ares<\/em>, mais jamais plus sur le JSF).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Du lecteur <em>RSF<\/em> : &laquo;<em>First of all, welcome back Bill, and thank you for the great article&hellip;<\/em>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sweetman est de retour&hellip; Petite nouvelle dans le petit monde des blogs, grande nouvelle pour l&rsquo;information \u00e0 propos du JSF&hellip; Bill Sweetman, \u00ab\u00a0interdit\u00a0\u00bb de JSF depuis plus d&rsquo;un mois et demi, est de retour pour les commentaires sur le JSF sur son blog d&rsquo;Ares, le 1er juillet 2010. Bonne nouvelle, dont il est difficile d&rsquo;estimer&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9783,4195,9782,6597,9286,250,6769,4247],"class_list":["post-72040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-ares","tag-aviation","tag-back","tag-commentaire","tag-is","tag-jsf","tag-sweetman","tag-week"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}