BP has longstanding ties to Iran, getting its start as the Anglo-Persian (later Anglo-Iranian) Oil Company, and found itself at the center of the 1953 CIA coup d’etat against Iran’s Mossadeq government, in no small part orchestrated to protect its oil interests in the nation.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tExtrait de la d\u00e9p\u00eache Reuters d\u00e9j\u00e0 cit\u00e9e, ce commentaire qui \u00e9claire le cas d’un BP soutenant \u00e0 titre individuel la politique de sanctions dures de Washington : \u00abSamuel Ciszuk, a senior analyst at IHS Global Insight, said that if the report proved correct it could suggest that BP is trying to be pro-active in managing political relations in the U.S. which are already under tremendous strain because of the Gulf (of Mexico) spill. The last thing they need now is having a U.S. congressman, for example, saying they are helping Iran.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tSi la nouvelle se confirmait, on aurait un cas int\u00e9ressant d’une interf\u00e9rence directe entre deux crises qui n’ont \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue aucun rapport entre elles : le oil spill<\/em> du Golfe du Mexique et l’affaire des sanctions contre l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"La politique de BP Il y a eu diverses rumeurs hier et aujourd’hui sur le refus de quelques pays de ravitailler en carburant sur leurs a\u00e9roports les avions commerciaux iraniens. Deux de ces pays (le Royaume-Uni et l’Allemagne) ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 d\u00e9menti, ce d\u00e9menti confirm\u00e9 par le ministre iranien des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res (voir Reuters, ce 6… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3734,8633,9801,3285,2773,5423,9799,9800,5646],"class_list":["post-72050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-avions","tag-british","tag-commerciaux","tag-congres","tag-iran","tag-iraniens","tag-petroleum","tag-ravitaillement","tag-sanctions"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}