http:\/\/www.dailyfinance.com\/story\/careers\/what-is-the-real-unemployment-rate\/19556146\/#<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abRaghavan Mayur, president at TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence, follows unemployment data closely. So, when his survey for May revealed that 28% of the 1,000-odd households surveyed reported that at least one member was looking for a full-time job, he was flummoxed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbOur numbers are always very accurate, so I was surprised at the discrepancy with the government’s numbers, says Mayur, whose firm owns the TIPP polling unit, a polling partner for Investors’ Business Daily and Christian Science Monitor. After all, the headline number shows the U.S. unemployment rate today is 9.5%, with a total of 14.6 million jobless people.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHowever, Mayur’s polls continued to find much worse figures. The June poll turned up 27.8% of households with at least one member who’s unemployed and looking for a job, while the latest poll conducted in the second week of July showed 28.6% in that situation. That translates to an unemployment rate of over 22%, says Mayur, who has started questioning the accuracy of the Labor Department’s jobless numbers.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMayur isn’t alone in harboring such doubts, nor is he the first to wonder about inaccuracies. For years, many economists have pointed to evidence that the government data undercounts the unemployed. Economist Helen Ginsburg, co-founder of advocacy group National Jobs For All Coalition, and John Williams of the newsletter Shadow Government Statistics have been questioning these numbers for years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn fact, Austan Goolsbee, who is now part of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in a 2003 New York Times piece titled The Unemployment Myth, that the government had cooked the books by not correctly counting all the people it should, thereby keeping the unemployment rate artificially low. At the time, Goolsbee was a professor at the University of Chicago. When asked whether Goolsbee still believes the government undercounts unemployment, a White House spokeswoman said Goolsbee wasn’t available to comment.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHowever, John Williams, founder of Shadow Government Statistics, says when accounting for the long-term unemployed, the jobless rate runs up to as much as 22% currently. Williams’s newsletter, which analyzes flaws in government economic data, points out that such a rate isn’t that far from the 25% it hit during the Great Depression.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
Jacques Laubion<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le vrai ch\u00f4mage aux USA : 22% ? Encore quelques pr\u00e9cisions sur la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du ch\u00f4mage aux USA, avec l’expos\u00e9 d’une enqu\u00eate serr\u00e9e d’une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 statistique US sur la question du ch\u00f4mage. Le chiffre du ch\u00f4mage r\u00e9el auquel cette soci\u00e9t\u00e9 arrive est de 22% (contre 9,5% officiel), ce qui n’est pas tr\u00e8s loin des 25%… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9851,3354,9852,9110,5446,2671],"class_list":["post-72103","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-9851","tag-chomage","tag-falsification","tag-laubion","tag-officielle","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72103","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72103"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72103\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72103"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72103"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72103"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}