{"id":72153,"date":"2010-08-03T04:03:19","date_gmt":"2010-08-03T04:03:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/08\/03\/larizona-enflamme-washington\/"},"modified":"2010-08-03T04:03:19","modified_gmt":"2010-08-03T04:03:19","slug":"larizona-enflamme-washington","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/08\/03\/larizona-enflamme-washington\/","title":{"rendered":"L’Arizona enflamme Washington"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’Arizona enflamme Washington<\/h4>\n

Le conflit d\u00e9clench\u00e9 autour de la loi SB 1070<\/a> de l’Arizona sur l’immigration touche d\u00e9sormais Washington. Il s’agit de s\u00e9nateurs r\u00e9publicains, qui interviennent dans ce d\u00e9bat, donnant une dimension nationale et institutionnelle \u00e0 la querelle entre l’administration f\u00e9d\u00e9rale et l’Etat de l’Arizona. Au coeur du d\u00e9bat \u00e9galement, l’attaque du s\u00e9nateur de l’Arizona Kyl, n\u00b02 du parti r\u00e9publicain et partisan de la loi SB 1070, contre le 14\u00e8me amendement de la Constitution qui donne la citoyennet\u00e9 US \u00e0 un enfant n\u00e9 sur le territoire US, m\u00eame si ses parents n’ont pas la nationalit\u00e9 US. Cet amendement, qui fut institu\u00e9 en 1868 pour assurer que les esclaves \u00e9mancip\u00e9s aient la nationalit\u00e9 US, permet aux enfants d’immigrants ill\u00e9gaux d’acqu\u00e9rir la nationalit\u00e9 US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’attaque du s\u00e9nateur Kyl a eu lieu le 1er ao\u00fbt 2010<\/a>, lors l’\u00e9mission Face the Nation<\/em> sur CBS.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abSen. John Kyl, R-Ariz., said today that Congress should hold hearings to look into denying citizenship to illegal aliens’ children born in the United States, as the fight over immigration widens into the explosive birthright issue.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbKyl told CBS’ Face the Nation’ that he supports a call by fellow Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to introduce a new amendment to repeal the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbSupport is growing for this stunning reversal from Graham, who in 2007 drew the ire of Republicans when he lobbied for granting legal status to 12 million undocumented workers, and along with President George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., led the failed immigration reform effort that would have given illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCette affaire du 14\u00e8me amendement est directement li\u00e9e \u00e0 la controverse de la loi SB 1070 de l’Etat de l’Arizona. Le s\u00e9nateur Kyl en a \u00e9galement parl\u00e9 dimanche, en affirmant que le Congr\u00e8s devrait se prononcer sur cette loi (en sa faveur), plut\u00f4t que laisser cette affaire \u00e0 l’administration.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab…Kyl is a supporter of the law. I think the court’s decision was wrong, he said today. The governor and legislative leaders have talked about possibly tweaking to use their phrase the law to see if they can obviate the concerns the judge expressed. I don’t think they can because her decision was very sweeping.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI think it more likely that Congress could act to actually fix the problem, Kyl said, by reaffirming that it is Congress’ intent that the law be enforced, rather than having the administration decide that they don’t want to thoroughly enforce the law. Kyl said his support of the law has to do with illegal aliens taking jobs that Americans want; immigrants posing a burden on the state in the form of education, medical care and welfare benefits; and crime.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe site Huffington.post<\/em> (le 2 ao\u00fbt 2010<\/a>) publie \u00e9galement un texte sur l’attitude du s\u00e9nateur Kyl sur la question du 14\u00e8me amendement, en faveur d’une l\u00e9gislation qui annihile ses effets, pour constater que cette question est d\u00e9j\u00e0 largement d\u00e9battue dans le m\u00eame sens au sein du parti r\u00e9publicain. Le d\u00e9bat risque bien de prendre une place centrale dans la campagne \u00e9lectorale de novembre, et au-del\u00e0. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abOn Sunday, Sen. John Kyl (R-Ariz.) became the highest-ranking Republican to call for the repeal of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.<\/em> In doing so, the Senate’s no. 2 Republican didn’t place himself on the extreme wing of his party’s stance on immigration policy. Rather, he joined what is a growing movement that could very well shape the official policy planks of the GOP. []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut what may be most telling about the 14th amendment repeal campaign the element that suggests it could be a major philosophical force within the Republican Party are its roots. Well before it became en vogue for Republicans to advocate fundamental change in citizenship laws, the idea was being bandied about among the intellectual bastions of the conservative movement. The Heritage Foundation produced a report on the matter in 2006. And Fred Thompson back when he was igniting a whisper campaign that he was the one Republican with the intellectual heft to run for president – was talking about repealing the 14th amendment back in 2007.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI think that law was created at another time and place for valid reasons, said the former U.S. senator from Tennessee. It probably needs to be revisited.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’Arizona enflamme Washington Le conflit d\u00e9clench\u00e9 autour de la loi SB 1070 de l’Arizona sur l’immigration touche d\u00e9sormais Washington. Il s’agit de s\u00e9nateurs r\u00e9publicains, qui interviennent dans ce d\u00e9bat, donnant une dimension nationale et institutionnelle \u00e0 la querelle entre l’administration f\u00e9d\u00e9rale et l’Etat de l’Arizona. Au coeur du d\u00e9bat \u00e9galement, l’attaque du s\u00e9nateur de l’Arizona… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[9900,9683,5816,7664,4518,3330,9904,7467,9899],"class_list":["post-72153","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-9900","tag-14eme","tag-amendement","tag-arizona","tag-constitution","tag-immigration","tag-kyl","tag-nationalite","tag-sb"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72153","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72153"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72153\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72153"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72153"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72153"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}