Nouvelle mont\u00e9e de tension \u00e0 Washington, d’ailleurs en d\u00e9veloppement depuis deux ou trois semaines. Cette fois, la d\u00e9claration<\/a> de l’amiral Mullen, pr\u00e9sident du JCS, selon laquelle le Pentagone a des plans d’attaque pr\u00eats contre l’Iran est la cause de la mont\u00e9e de fi\u00e8vre. Bien que cette d\u00e9claration n’apprenne rien de nouveau, puisque le Pentagone a toujours<\/strong> des plans d’attaque pr\u00eats, elle est la cause de nouvelles sp\u00e9culations sur la forme et les conditions de l’attaque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe Washington Times<\/em> donne la parole aux experts, d’un calibre assez proche de celui que d\u00e9crit Justin Raimondo<\/a>. L’article est du 2 ao\u00fbt 2010<\/a>, et il fait la part belle aux bombardiers de l’USAF. Tout y est, les missiles qui tapent l\u00e0 o\u00f9 il faut, le nombre d’objectifs devenus soudain tr\u00e8s r\u00e9duits, la r\u00e9volution de velours qui met parall\u00e8lement \u00e0 bas les mollahs<\/em> et ainsi de suite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abA Pentagon strike against Iran would rely heavily on the B-2 bomber and cruise missiles to try to destroy the regime’s ability to make nuclear weapons, analysts say, after the top U.S. military officer said a war plan is in place. The missiles, fired from surface ships, submarines and B-52 bombers, would take out air defenses and nuclear-related facilities.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe B-2s would drop tons of bombs, including ground penetrators, onto fortified and buried sites where Tehran is suspected of enriching uranium to fuel the weapons and working on warheads. It will be primarily an air attack with covert work to start a velvet’ revolution so [the] Iranian people can take back their country, said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, a former fighter pilot.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbGen. McInerney said B-2s would fly over Iran while cruise missiles would be fired off shore. The operation would last several days, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbJohn Pike, a military analyst who runs Global Security.org, said that although Iran has many potential targets, only about a half-dozen facilities are so critical that, if destroyed, would set back the program significantly.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAlmost all are in isolated areas where civilian casualties would not be much of a problem, Mr. Pike said. Most of them have co-located staff housing. Bomb the housing, kill the staff, set back the program by a generation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbHis website’s scenario states: American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States two-dozen suspect nuclear sites would be targeted.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Comment l’attaque contre l’Iran aura lieu Nouvelle mont\u00e9e de tension \u00e0 Washington, d’ailleurs en d\u00e9veloppement depuis deux ou trois semaines. Cette fois, la d\u00e9claration de l’amiral Mullen, pr\u00e9sident du JCS, selon laquelle le Pentagone a des plans d’attaque pr\u00eats contre l’Iran est la cause de la mont\u00e9e de fi\u00e8vre. Bien que cette d\u00e9claration n’apprenne rien… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[2870,3233,2773,4569,4337,41],"class_list":["post-72157","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-attaque","tag-b-2","tag-iran","tag-mcinerney","tag-raimondo","tag-usaf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72157","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72157"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72157\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}