{"id":72276,"date":"2010-09-14T09:46:20","date_gmt":"2010-09-14T09:46:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/09\/14\/le-canada-et-le-coup-detat\/"},"modified":"2010-09-14T09:46:20","modified_gmt":"2010-09-14T09:46:20","slug":"le-canada-et-le-coup-detat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/09\/14\/le-canada-et-le-coup-detat\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Canada et le coup d&rsquo;Etat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h4>Le Canada et le coup d&rsquo;Etat<\/h4>\n<p>La <em>Gazette<\/em> de Montr\u00e9al du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.montrealgazette.com\/news\/RCMP+identify+coup+etat+threat\/3514942\/story.html\" class=\"gen\">12 septembre 2010<\/a> mentionne une nouveaut\u00e9 dans le rapport de la fameuse police mont\u00e9e canadienne (RCMP) remis au gouvernement pour les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9, pour 2010-2011. Quatre champs de menace relevant du travail de police sont identifi\u00e9s, parmi lesquels trois sont classiques (espionnage et sabotage, terrorisme, activit\u00e9s criminelles d&rsquo;origine \u00e9trang\u00e8re dirig\u00e9es contre les int\u00e9r\u00eats canadiens). Le quatri\u00e8me est tout \u00e0 fait inhabituel et appara\u00eet pour la premi\u00e8re fois dans un rapport de la RCMP : la possibilit\u00e9 de tentatives de coup d&rsquo;Etat par la violence (\u00ab<em>Activities aimed at over-throwing, by violence, the Government of Canada<\/em>\u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tD&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, les commentaires mettent en \u00e9vidence la r\u00e9duction de l&rsquo;importance du terrorisme dans les pr\u00e9occupations de la police. Mais l&rsquo;id\u00e9e d&rsquo;un coup d&rsquo;Etat ? Remarque d&rsquo;ordre g\u00e9n\u00e9ral d&rsquo;abord : \u00ab<em>While hyperbolic, the mention of a coup threat appears to reflect the force&rsquo;s return to a broader operational approach to guarding national security.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPuis le journal devient plus pr\u00e9cis, mais d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on indirecte et par analogie. Simplement, il \u00e9voque le pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent d&rsquo;une intention de renversement du gouvernement quotidien,  \u00e9videmment, par la CIA, ce qui laisse \u00e0 penser, apr\u00e8s tout, \u00e0 propos de l&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation qu&rsquo;on peut faire de la pr\u00e9occupation nouvelle de la RCMP<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The 1999 book Agent of Influence alleged the U.S. CIA plotted a de facto coup of Lester B. Pearson&rsquo;s government in the early 1960s.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Canadian author Ian Adams claimed that after the 1963 assassination of U.S. president John F. Kennedy, CIA counter-intelligence branch head James Jesus Angleton became convinced Pearson was an agent for Russian intelligence and supposedly had information from a Soviet defector backing him up.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The CIA took great personal offence at Pearson&rsquo;s independent stands in foreign policy, his grain trades with the Soviet Union, his antiwar positions on Vietnam, and especially his friendly stance on Cuba, wrote Adams.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>To get at Pearson, the CIA set its sights first on Canadian diplomat James Watkins, Canada&rsquo;s ambassador to Russia in the mid-1950s and a friend of the prime minister. After 27 days of interrogation by the Mounties, the 62-year-old Watkins&rsquo;s troubled heart gave out and he died, apparently without supplying the confession the spymasters hoped could bring down the government.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEtonnante \u00e9vocation ? Mais il ne faut jamais d\u00e9sesp\u00e9rer des USA&#8230; En 2005, le Washington <em>Post<\/em> publiait (le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/29\/AR2005122901412_pf.html\" class=\"gen\">30 d\u00e9cembre 2005<\/a>) un article sur un document qui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9classifi\u00e9 quelques d\u00e9cennies plus t\u00f4t et qui dormait paisiblement dans les Archives Nationales. Il s&rsquo;agissait d&rsquo;un plan d&rsquo;invasion du Canada dress\u00e9 dans les ann\u00e9es 1925-1930. Dans ces ann\u00e9es-l\u00e0, en effet, la principale menace de guerre du point de vue US \u00e9tait avec le Royaume-Uni, dont le Canada \u00e9tait consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un <em>dominion<\/em> fid\u00e8le. (Les autres possibilit\u00e9s de guerre s\u00e9rieuses envisag\u00e9es par les militaires US \u00e9taient avec le Mexique, le Japon et l&rsquo;Allemagne, comme mentionn\u00e9 ci-dessous, mais la possibilit\u00e9 de conflit avec le Royaume-Uni \u00e9tait de loin la plus grande dans les ann\u00e9es 1927-1931.) Il faut donc savoir, sans s&rsquo;\u00e9tonner outre mesure, qu&rsquo;avec les USA, bien des choses peuvent arriver.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>It sounds like a joke but it&rsquo;s not. War Plan Red is real. It was drawn up and approved by the War Department in 1930, then updated in 1934 and 1935. It was declassified in 1974 and the word SECRET crossed out with a heavy pencil. Now it sits in a little gray box in the National Archives in College Park, available to anybody, even Canadian spies. They can photocopy it for 15 cents a page.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>War Plan Red was actually designed for a war with England. In the late 1920s, American military strategists developed plans for a war with Japan (code name Orange), Germany (Black), Mexico (Green) and England (Red). The Americans imagined a conflict between the United States (Blue) and England over international trade: \u00ab\u00a0The war aim of RED in a war with BLUE is conceived to be the definite elimination of BLUE as an important economic and commercial rival.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In the event of war, the American planners figured that England would use Canada (Crimson)  then a quasi-pseudo-semi-independent British dominion  as a launching pad for a direct invasion of BLUE territory. That invasion might come overland, with British and Canadian troops attacking Buffalo, Detroit and Albany. Or it might come by sea, with amphibious landings on various American beaches &#8212; including Rehoboth and Ocean City, both of which were identified by the planners as excellent sites for a Brit beachhead.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<p class=\"signature\"><em>dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Canada et le coup d&rsquo;Etat La Gazette de Montr\u00e9al du 12 septembre 2010 mentionne une nouveaut\u00e9 dans le rapport de la fameuse police mont\u00e9e canadienne (RCMP) remis au gouvernement pour les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9, pour 2010-2011. Quatre champs de menace relevant du travail de police sont identifi\u00e9s, parmi lesquels trois sont classiques (espionnage et&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3279,3708,3104,2625,3889,10039,7316,6266],"class_list":["post-72276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-angleton","tag-canada","tag-cia","tag-coup","tag-detat","tag-invasion","tag-montee","tag-police"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72276"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72276\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}