Un excellent texte de Politico.com<\/em>, du 15 septembre 2010<\/a>, donne un \u00e9clairage r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur de l’ambiance qui r\u00e8gne au sein du parti r\u00e9publicain US apr\u00e8s les primaires d’hier (voir notre Bloc-Notes<\/em> du 15 septembre 2010<\/a>). Il s’agit d’un point de vue notablement diff\u00e9rent, qui d\u00e9crit ici la fureur des dirigeants et des caciques du parti devant cette irruption forc\u00e9e de candidats t\u00e9l\u00e9guid\u00e9s par Tea Party<\/em> et la fureur populaire. D’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0, des mesures s’organisent, et il appara\u00eet tr\u00e8s possible que le parti r\u00e9publicain abandonne O’Donnell<\/a> \u00e0 son sort (notamment financi\u00e8rement), jugeant la partie perdue d’avance dans son cas, et, \u00e9galement, peu soucieux de s’embarrasser d’une telle s\u00e9natrice. On sent une m\u00eame tendance pour d’autres candidats du m\u00eame style. De leur c\u00f4t\u00e9, les d\u00e9mocrates triomphent, jugeant ces candidats panach\u00e9s parti r\u00e9publicain\/Tea Party<\/em> relativement ais\u00e9s \u00e0 battre…<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIl s’agit sans aucun doute d’un affrontement entre l’establishment<\/em> et le peuple votant. Si les nouveaux venus axent toutes leurs campagnes sur cette qualit\u00e9 de candidats anti-establishment<\/em>, plut\u00f4t que sur leurs programmes qui sont parfois bien d\u00e9routants, ils ont quelques chances de provoquer autant de surprises qui pourraient embarrasser les dirigeants politiques washingtoniens. Dans tous les cas, ils sont bien le signe du d\u00e9sordre US : repr\u00e9sentant le parti auquel tous les sondages pr\u00e9disent une victoire \u00e9crasante, ils introduisent dans la direction de ce parti un d\u00e9sarroi furieux et une incertitude nouvelle sur l’issue et, surtout, sur le caract\u00e8re et la signification du scrutin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abChristine O’Donnell’s surprise victory in the Delaware Senate GOP primary Tuesday left Republicans in conflict, senior party officials openly fretting that the Senate is now out of reach and Democrats overjoyed that the opposition has handed them a late and desperately needed chance to reframe the national argument about the 2010 elections.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAside from the political implications of the upset, the outcome prompted a round of deep Republican soul-searching about what it said about their party when a political pillar in Delaware like Rep. Mike Castle, a respected lawmaker who was considered a shoo-in for the Senate seat, could not even come within six points of defeating the controversial and still largely unknown O’Donnell.<\/em> []<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbAt a practical level, the party’s nomination of candidates such as O’Donnell, Angle, <\/em> [Rand] Paul has served to put races in play that, in a climate this favorable to Republicans, never should have been competitive.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbBut the Delaware results, in particular, were a shock to Republicans who were previously able to find some plausible explanation for why one of their incumbents or top candidates had taken a loss. Castle, unlike Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Robert Bennett, went after O’Donnell aggressively, exposed some damning information about what Rove called her checkered background, and hadn’t been the target of notable dissent within the state party.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbBut voters shrugged their shoulders. People didn’t’ care, lamented one GOP strategist involved in the race, referring to the reaction to reams of oppo research on O’Donnell.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThat GOP primary voters would go ahead and nominate such a risky candidate has establishment Republicans worrying about who, if anybody, is now in charge of a traditionally top-down party.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbIf nothing else, the 8 primary election defeats suffered by NRSC-favored candidates this year indicates the lack of a unified command structure within the GOP now. It has, in effect, become an uncontrolled and ungoverned party in which the powers that be in Washington are mere bystanders.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWhere are the adults? one strategist wondered. Davis put it bluntly: The Republican establishment has no cache right now.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \n dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Difficult\u00e9 r\u00e9currente de la dissolution du peuple Un excellent texte de Politico.com, du 15 septembre 2010, donne un \u00e9clairage r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur de l’ambiance qui r\u00e8gne au sein du parti r\u00e9publicain US apr\u00e8s les primaires d’hier (voir notre Bloc-Notes du 15 septembre 2010). Il s’agit d’un point de vue notablement diff\u00e9rent, qui d\u00e9crit ici la fureur des… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[4646,10044,4141,10043,5623,7069,5303,7347,3686,8256,3248],"class_list":["post-72282","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-antisysteme","tag-delaware","tag-elections","tag-odonnell","tag-parti","tag-party","tag-populisme","tag-primaires","tag-republicain","tag-tea","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72282","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72282"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72282\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}