Trident<\/em>, c’est-\u00e0-dire une ind\u00e9cision compl\u00e8te sur cette question, mettrait sans aucun doute le Pentagone de fort mauvaise humeur et tendrait des relations priviul\u00e9gi\u00e9es d\u00e9kj\u00e0 fort incerrtanes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe Liberal Democrat leadership appears to be winning crucial battles with its Tory partners over immigration and the renewal of Trident.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbSenior Liberal Democrats are increasingly confident they will secure a delay to approving the renewal of Britain’s \u00a320bn Trident nuclear weapons system until after the general election, which is due in May 2015. The final Government go-ahead for Trident is scheduled for 2014 under current plans.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIt is very important for us that the issue is still alive going into the election, said one senior member. We want to go into it with a clear difference on this. It makes sense for us, but also for David Cameron, to show he is leading a modern Conservative Party.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbNick Harvey, the armed forces minister, prepared the ground for a delay to take place, openly talking about a postponement at the Liberal Democrat conference in Liverpool yesterday and rejecting Tory suggestions it would drive up the cost of the project. If it were to be delayed until just after the May 2015 election, it is of no great financial significance, it is of no great military significance, it is of no great industrial significance, he said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n
dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"La d\u00e9cision sur l’avenir de la force nucl\u00e9aire britannique repouss\u00e9e ? Les lib\u00e9raux d\u00e9mocrates, alli\u00e9s des conservateurs britanniques dans l’actuel gouvernement, seraient sur le point de l’emporter sur leurs partenaires dans l’affaire de la la d\u00e9cision sur le sort futur de la force nucl\u00e9aire strat\u00e9gique nucl\u00e9aire britannique (actuellement des sous-marins lanceurs d’engins Trident), selon The… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[3009,5905,3004,3194,10086,2766,4775],"class_list":["post-72309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-democrates","tag-liberaux","tag-nucleaire","tag-pentagone","tag-privilegiees","tag-relations","tag-trident"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}