{"id":72339,"date":"2010-10-04T07:13:33","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T07:13:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/10\/04\/la-navy-et-le-jsf-suite-very-very-stealthy\/"},"modified":"2010-10-04T07:13:33","modified_gmt":"2010-10-04T07:13:33","slug":"la-navy-et-le-jsf-suite-very-very-stealthy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2010\/10\/04\/la-navy-et-le-jsf-suite-very-very-stealthy\/","title":{"rendered":"La Navy et le JSF (suite) : very, very stealthy<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

La Navy et le JSF (suite) : very, very stealthy<\/em><\/h4>\n

On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 not\u00e9<\/a>, \u00e0 propos de d\u00e9clarations de Winslow Wheeler, la r\u00e9ticence grandissante de l’U.S. Navy vis-\u00e0-vis du JSF. En marge des actuels ennuis<\/a> du programme et selon ce que certains jugeront comme un rapport indirect, certains \u00e9l\u00e9ments confirment, \u00e9galement de fa\u00e7on indirecte, la position de la Navy.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans une nouvelle sur AviationWeek.com<\/em> (Ares<\/em>), le 24 septembre 2010<\/a>, o\u00f9 elle annon\u00e7ait la nomination d’un nouveau chef des relations publiques du programme apr\u00e8s des mois de vacance du poste, Amy Butler rappelait l’\u00e9tonnant profil bas du nouveau directeur du programme au Pentagone, qui est un officier g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de la Navy nomm\u00e9 en f\u00e9vrier dernier, le vice-amiral Venlet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abSince his arrival at the JPO, Venlet has been mum. He did not attend the Farnborough Air Show this year outside London, and he’s not given interviews since taking office this spring. So, aside from occasional comments from Pentagon procurement czar Ashton Carter, the sole official voice speaking for the program is contractor Lockheed Martin. Though the company is dedicated to executing the program, its interests are arguably different than those of the U.S. government and taxpayer. With LRIP 4 negotiations finished with Lockheed Martin, the time is right for the admiral to start laying out his vision of what is ahead for the critical program.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEffectivement, le 9 juillet 2010<\/a>, Butler s’\u00e9tonnait de l’absence de Venlet \u00e0 Farnborough<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abVice Adm. David Venlet, the new director of the tri-service, nine-nation Joint Strike Fighter program, is not planning to attend the Farnborough Air Show during his first year in the high-profile post. Neither he nor his staff will attend the show, says Cheryl Irwin, a Pentagon spokeswoman.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbFarnborough is the most high-profile, international aerospace event of the year. Venlet’s decision is a bit of a surprise, given the important role that allies play in achieving the goals of the F-35 program.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCes divers \u00e9v\u00e9nements, ou non-\u00e9v\u00e9nements, sont pour le moins un \u00e9l\u00e9ment de plus du dossier de la position plus que r\u00e9serv\u00e9e, sinon secr\u00e8tement hostile de la Navy vis-\u00e0-vis du JSF. Le vice-amiral Venlet est d’abord un homme de la Navy et il agit en fonction des int\u00e9r\u00eats et des projets de la Navy, sinon sur ordre de la Navy. Son absence compl\u00e8te de la sc\u00e8ne publique est une tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieuse indication de la position de la Navy, qui pourrait effectivement se concr\u00e9tiser apr\u00e8s le d\u00e9part de Gates, comme l’indiquait Wheeler. C’est-\u00e0-dire, le retrait de la Navy du programme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

dedefensa.org<\/em><\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La Navy et le JSF (suite) : very, very stealthy On a d\u00e9j\u00e0 not\u00e9, \u00e0 propos de d\u00e9clarations de Winslow Wheeler, la r\u00e9ticence grandissante de l’U.S. Navy vis-\u00e0-vis du JSF. En marge des actuels ennuis du programme et selon ce que certains jugeront comme un rapport indirect, certains \u00e9l\u00e9ments confirment, \u00e9galement de fa\u00e7on indirecte, la… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[2610,3218,3633,3507,250,3319,7761,2671,10130],"class_list":["post-72339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ouverture-libre","tag-amiral","tag-bas","tag-butler","tag-farnborough","tag-jsf","tag-navy","tag-profil","tag-us","tag-venlet"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72339"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72339\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}